View Full Version : High speed card really worth it?
Rambler
14th of June 2005 (Tue), 09:48
I am looking at buying a Kingston Elite card for my S400. I am using a Ritz Camera CF card that came with the camera. On this type of camera, will the higher speed card really make a difference?
Thanks in advance.
Rambler
jrobert
14th of June 2005 (Tue), 10:28
I am looking at buying a Kingston Elite card for my S400. I am using a Ritz Camera CF card that came with the camera. On this type of camera, will the higher speed card really make a difference?
Thanks in advance.
Rambler
The only way I know to find out is to try it - can you borrow a faster one from someone? My A70 will take more frames in multiple exposure mode before the buffer fills, with a Sandisk Ultra-II than it did with the Canon-supplied card (8-10 frames vs. 2-3).
-jeff-
Photonak
14th of June 2005 (Tue), 12:41
The only way I know to find out is to try it - can you borrow a faster one from someone? My A70 will take more frames in multiple exposure mode before the buffer fills, with a Sandisk Ultra-II than it did with the Canon-supplied card (8-10 frames vs. 2-3).
-jeff-
You may also see a quicker transfer from CF via the reader, if you also have USB2 port.
I second Jeff's note. I don't see any other time that you'd see the speed.
Short answer for me (with A70) is no.
Photonak
lostdoggy
14th of June 2005 (Tue), 13:38
The difference will be marginal no leaps and bounds. The high speed ones will help the newer DSLR because they have the newer DIGIC II chipset.
Don Schaeffer
14th of June 2005 (Tue), 19:58
I read somewhere that some cameras do not have the circuitry to use the high speed firmware in the card. My camera is an A70 and I think that is one camera that can't take advantage of high speed cards.
--Don
S45_fornow...
15th of June 2005 (Wed), 07:09
I am looking at buying a Kingston Elite card for my S400. I am using a Ritz Camera CF card that came with the camera. On this type of camera, will the higher speed card really make a difference?
Thanks in advance.
Rambler
High speed cards are good if you use burst-mode a lot, or have a camera with demanding movie mode (requires fast write-to speed).
USB2.0 picture uploads from your camera will also benefit, but the S400 does not support USB2.0.
Rambler
15th of June 2005 (Wed), 08:43
What do you mean by burst mode? I know someone once told me that a camera would be faster if you capture the photes in RAW instead of JPEG. I don't know what RAW is or if it is available on a S400
Rambler
likophoto
15th of June 2005 (Wed), 10:45
I really doubt that the S400 is able to shoot and save pictures in RAW format. I think it will only save them in JPEG. Usually RAW is a bigger file than JPEG, this means that it will take longer to write to the card.
Photonak mentioned a card reader. This is a must for digital cameras that don't have usb 2.0 capabilities. I bought one for my computer and can transfers pictures off the card in no time! It takes me seconds to transfer pictures instead of minutes.
cincophoto
15th of June 2005 (Wed), 19:23
I agree, a card reader is a must for any transfering of data, pictures ans so forth
mike j
16th of June 2005 (Thu), 10:21
No, the S400 doesn't take pics in RAW mode - jpegs only.
As far as burst mode is concerned, I think this is just the facility by which you hold down the shutter button and it takes photo after photo as fast as the camera can manage it - not something I do often.
I personally wouldn't bother with a higher speed card, unless there wasn't much difference in price (they can often be quite a bit more expensive)
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.