psyp3
18th of June 2005 (Sat), 10:11
Hi,
I am new to this forum and I am Poolak from Yokohama. Japan. I have one EOS-55 with 28-105, 100-300 and 17-40 lenses (all Canon). I have bought one 20D recently and keeping 17-40 as the walk-around lens for the 20D. In fact, I will get rid of EOS-55 (with 28-105 & 100-300) soon.
I have some confusion:
To have an overall coverage from wide to tele (as well as to keep my 17-40),
Shall I go for EFS 10-22 to have something in the wide region?
Shall I go for EF70-200 F4L (not considering F2.8 for cost and weight) to cover the tele zone?
I am an amateur and hence want to cover both the extreme as the case may be.
Regarding EFS 10-22, I don’t know much (nor its close one in Canon family) but I have heard a lot between 70-200 versus 28-135 (the latter having mixed comments whereas 70-200 is everybody’s darling).
Any suggestion and the way I should proceed (buy wide first then go for tele kind of guidance) is highly needed at this stage.
Best regards,
Poolak
:confused:
I am new to this forum and I am Poolak from Yokohama. Japan. I have one EOS-55 with 28-105, 100-300 and 17-40 lenses (all Canon). I have bought one 20D recently and keeping 17-40 as the walk-around lens for the 20D. In fact, I will get rid of EOS-55 (with 28-105 & 100-300) soon.
I have some confusion:
To have an overall coverage from wide to tele (as well as to keep my 17-40),
Shall I go for EFS 10-22 to have something in the wide region?
Shall I go for EF70-200 F4L (not considering F2.8 for cost and weight) to cover the tele zone?
I am an amateur and hence want to cover both the extreme as the case may be.
Regarding EFS 10-22, I don’t know much (nor its close one in Canon family) but I have heard a lot between 70-200 versus 28-135 (the latter having mixed comments whereas 70-200 is everybody’s darling).
Any suggestion and the way I should proceed (buy wide first then go for tele kind of guidance) is highly needed at this stage.
Best regards,
Poolak
:confused: