First Wedding-Second shooter.

[Rachel B]

This was the first wedding that have assisted on.

Well the lighting ended up sucking bad in the church, so Ishot at between ISO 600 and 800, i am going to post some of those pictures later.

it was a good learning experience!

Here are a couple of edits from after the ceremony. please C and C

1
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4283303160_ef4dac70eb_o.jpg

2
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4021/4283303352_a30e2ac1d1_o.jpg

3
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4050/4282558947_769cc5e7ab_o.jpg

4
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2799/4282557809_2e65e9238f_o.jpg

5
Is my horizon straight ;) bad thing about using a long lens, is sometimes I cant move back fast enough!
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4006/4282558661_dccc545901_o.jpg

6
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2716/4283303410_fc4b6ff386_o.jpg

[auroraskye]

Not bad for a first, you got some fun shots. The flower one doesn't do anything for me.. If I had a better idea of what they were doing back there, it would make more sense (even if they were out of focus, that's fine) but it's just like.. hey here are the flowers. But hey, by the way.. 600-800 ISO is easy stuff. :)

[exodusfman800]

Well the lighting ended up sucking bad in the church, so Ishot at between ISO 600 and 800, i am going to post some of those pictures later.


I'd be in heaven if "sucking bad" resulted in having to shoot at 600/800, lol.

[Svetlana]

^^^ oh yeah! when I was second shooting last time we both ended up shooting ISO4000-6400 to get decent exposure.

Fun shots by the way! #4 is my fave of the bunch.

[Rachel B]

Wow at those High ISO's I guess I was lucky! I need a full frame body, then it wouldnt be such a big deal!

Thanks for the comments

[eddylush]

I would say try and be more aware of backgrounds so you don't have straight lines coming out of heads (1,4,5) or distracting backgrounds (1,3,4,5,6)............ but its always easy afterwords :) Nice effort though
Eddy