PDA

View Full Version : The Loan Wolf


Doc Fluty
21st of January 2010 (Thu), 18:06
Loved this shot.. but the article says they think its a fake... i love the overall pic though

just thought id share

http://i47.tinypic.com/24v8dwl.jpg

The Natural History Museum's wildlife photographer of the year has been stripped of his £10,000 prize, after judges found he was likely to have hired a tame Iberian wolf to stage the image of a species seen rarely in the wild.

The judges of the award, which attracted more than 43,000 entries from 94 countries, said they were convinced José Luis Rodriguez hired the wolf called Ossian from a Madrid wildlife park, contradicting his claim the image was taken in the wild after months of patient tracking of the dwindling species.

Competition rules prohibit the use of animal models and this morning organisers took down Rodriguez's image from the exhibition at the museum in London, banned him from entering the contest again and announced they were "saddened" by the disqualification. Apparently without irony, he had titled his image The Storybook Wolf, but headline writers have since dubbed it the "loan wolf".

Rodriguez could not be contacted, but the competition organisers said he continued to strongly deny the wolf was tame.

"I remember thinking, my God, this really is a wild wolf, what an achievement," said Mark Carwardine, chairman of the judging panel. "I don't understand the mentality at all. People feel very disappointed with the photographer."

The organisers said they were planning to erect a notice at the Natural History Museum explaining to visitors their belief that the photo was staged, although it is too late to remove the image from the thousands of books that have been published by BBC Worldwide.

The controversy is thought to be the first time the competition's expert judging panel have allowed an animal model to win a prize and there was concern the revelation could damage a contest which has a reputation as the most prestigious of its kind in the world.

"The wildlife photographer of the year is the one institution that has pushed us [animal photographers] to be more creative, so it is very sad it has happened to this competition," said Chris Gomersall, a wildlife photographer who was involved in judging.

"In wildlife photography there are ethical guidelines and there has always been an explicit understanding that if you take pictures of a captive subject, you declare it on your caption."

Rodriguez had told the judges he had sketched the shot he wanted to get on paper, but "couldn't quite believe it when he got the shot of his dreams". He said his main fear had been that the wolves "would be too wary".

Jim Brandenburg, a judge and a wildlife photographer with 45 years experience of taking pictures of wolves, marvelled at the image of the animal, captured so clearly and apparently hunting a farmer's livestock. He declared it "a masterfully executed moment", but having studied pictures of Ossian and Rodriguez's image, he is now "99.9%" sure it is a tame wolf, according to Carwardine.

The organisers were alerted to suspicions about the image by Spanish photographers who recognised the wolf and the location as the Cañada Real wildlife park. Wolf experts also questioned why the wolf would jump the gate when a wild animal was more likely to squeeze between the bars.

The judges said they asked Rodriguez for corroboration of his story and if there was anyone who could act as a witness to back him up, but his answers were inadequate.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/wolf-wildlife-photographer-award-stripped#

Tom Reichner
21st of January 2010 (Thu), 21:00
I'm glad to see some distinction being made between photographing animals that are wild & free and those who are captive "pets".
It's not just the image that matters - it's the endeavor that went into making the image.
Perhaps this scandal will open the eyes of many to the fact that many of the images we believe to be of wildlife are actually of captivelife.

Shame on Rodriguez!

nads
21st of January 2010 (Thu), 21:01
I wouldn't have believed that to be real for a minute. I know someone who photographs wolves 300+ days a year and my understanding is that it is nearly impossible to catch a truly wild wolf from that kind of range. Most of his wild shots are with 500mm+ and that is usually not enough. There aren't many places where captive wolves would even be trained to jump a fence... most such facilities try to sustain natural behaviors for the purpose of observation. Those situations do make for some great photographic opportunites, though.

http://www.ruffiansabout.com/photo/albums/wolf-park/wolfpark2.jpg

digidiva
22nd of January 2010 (Fri), 08:26
All he broke was the rules of the competition, and he has rightfully been stripped of the prize etc.
It remains, however, a beautiful shot . obviously that is just MY opinion.

nads
22nd of January 2010 (Fri), 09:51
He lied about the photo and made up a longer lie to support it. Then he told the entire series of lies on a stage while he collected a big check


This guy's acts are no different than those of craigslist scammers. Maybe he can sell his image to a tshirt company instead... Wolf shirts never go out of style.

Karl Johnston
22nd of January 2010 (Fri), 10:27
Wonder what's going through his mind right now...

Pete W
22nd of January 2010 (Fri), 10:28
Wonder what's going through his mind right now...

"What do I do for a living now"

Tom Reichner
22nd of January 2010 (Fri), 11:04
It's a shame 'cause he's obviously an excellent photographer. I'm sure he's absolutely hated by all of the photographers who entered the competition; especially those who placed very high and feel they had a chance of winning if it weren't for him cheating.

RikWriter
23rd of January 2010 (Sat), 06:07
I wouldn't have believed that to be real for a minute. I know someone who photographs wolves 300+ days a year and my understanding is that it is nearly impossible to catch a truly wild wolf from that kind of range. Most of his wild shots are with 500mm+ and that is usually not enough.

Totally untrue.
This shot I took in Yellowstone last May was from about 20 yards away:

http://www.pbase.com/rikwriter/image/113662205.jpg

This one was about 50:

http://www.pbase.com/rikwriter/image/113231812.jpg

And this one was also about 50:

http://www.pbase.com/rikwriter/image/113232163.jpg

This one was taken from about 30:

http://www.pbase.com/rikwriter/image/113232384.jpg


All were taken with my 100-400.