View Full Version : LowePro Fastpack 250 review: Perfect school pack?
AlexeyK
5th of March 2010 (Fri), 08:22
I needed a camerabag/backpack for school and such, since I'm one of those people who likes bringing everything I own with me everywhere. I always liked having my camera everywhere, but my Timbuk2 messengerbag isn't padded at all so I looked for something else. My boss ordered this backpack to the store where I work and I picked it up at once, used it now for about 2 weeks and can safely say it's the perfect school/daytrip camerabag.
I don't have so much gear atm, but you can see how much space there's left in the camera compartment! It's enough for at least two more lenses and a flash, with some rearranging of the dividers it's maybe even enough for 3 more lenses (15-85/24-70/17-55 size lenses, the ones you don't have to lay on their side).
In the front there's also a small pocket which opens on the side (you can slightly see it) where you can put a couple of maps and an mp3 player.
Gear list in this:
Camera compartment
- 40D (ungripped) with Canon 50/1.4 attached
- Metz 48 AF-1 flash and offshoe flash-cord.
- 8 AA-batteries
- enough room for 2-3 more medium-sized lenses.
Upper compartment
- 5 books
- Moleskine drawing pad (hardcover)
- Small daybook/daily diary
- T-shirt
- pens
- some room for a cellphone etc in the pockets
Computer compartment
- Acer Aspire 5739 notebook
- Spiral-bound notepad (A4-sized)
- Magazine
Small outer pocket in on the upper side
- Map and mp3-player
Lower flap-pocket
- 40D charger
- space for another charger of the same size
- USB and power cables
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2692/4408010103_5fbbe7fa72.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/4408009981_fb25d96567.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4050/4408009897_ca82564c32.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2684/4408776134_e872f02d8a.jpg
Here's the pocket on the lower flap. It's pretty damn small, but enough for have a charger in each mesh pocket and all the cables you need.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4035/4408775868_8cc560e81e.jpg
Here's the upper compartment with some pockets for pens, a mesh pocket for some random things and a cellphone-pocket.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2754/4408009735_274329a4c1.jpg
In the computer-compartment I could fit my Acer Aspore notebook (it's pretty fat, about 3cm thick, maybe slightly more), a copy of an old Digital Photographer and a spiral-bound A4-sized notebook.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4058/4408009233_970d240007.jpg
AlexeyK
5th of March 2010 (Fri), 08:22
Here are the books I fit into the upper compartment with no problems. A4-sheet for size comparison, and they're about 2,5 cm thick, except the Moleskine drawing pad and «Big Sur».
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2711/4408009107_b6d18c5f31.jpg
Here's the thickness of the books.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2764/4408008973_4610ab7565_b.jpg
Here are the books inside the upper compartment, I also had space for a small daily diary/planner in there and a tshirt. They're not here atm, but they're packed in the last pictures.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2769/4408008861_496a2b2421.jpg
The camera compartment packed with all my gear, which is practically nothing. The flash also fits standing into the thinner pockets on the left side there, and you can put the batteries with the offshoe cord. So, there's space for at least two three more lenses.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2737/4408010169_369fab259e_o.jpg
Here's everything I fit into the bag. The 40D is in my hands, but it should be on this picture with a Canon 50/1.4 mounted. The tripod is HUGE, I never take it anywhere, but as you can see in the last pics it fits perfectly fine under the lower flap, though with a smaller one it wouldn't be so akward, so a smaller tripod would be more or less perfect. The coke bottle is in the side waterbottle-pocket.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4057/4408008751_b8f19d42db_b.jpg
Here is the backpack all packed up and ready to go.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4026/4408776650_d97f4772c1_o.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4050/4408776718_cc4c58fd2f_o.jpg
So this is the end of my review, hope those of you looking for this kind of backpack enojoy this.
I really enjoyed mine for these last 2 weeks. It feels great on the back, even when fully packed, and the belly-strap balanses the weight nicely. The computer compartment works great, and with the thick padding in the back you won't even feel it!
All in all I'm extremely impressed with this bag, and I feel it'll be with me for a long time! Much better space and stability than the Slingshot without losing the convenient quick-draw sideopened camera compartment.
The only negative side I can think of is that there's no waterproof cover, but on the other hand the material used is the typical ballistic-like fabris which is more or less waterproof by itself and really thick.
jdang307
5th of March 2010 (Fri), 15:02
I'm actually going to pick up this exact same bag. How easy is the sling and grab the camera from the side bit? Quick and easy? Cumbersome?
Waterproof cover,I'll never shoot in rain anyway and if I fall in a lake, I'll worry about surviving first (I can't swim).
Tripod. Sucks there is no tripod mount, but I've read, with a smaller tripod (I plan on the Feisol traveller) you can tuck it in the water holder on the side, and strap it down with a ball bungee.
zelseman
5th of March 2010 (Fri), 15:11
What kept you from getting the 350? I'm in the market for a school type bag.
The Moose
5th of March 2010 (Fri), 17:53
I've had this bag for over a year but soon decided I didn't like a backpack anymore. I've gone on a quest to find the perfect shoulder bag (laptop, gear, books) for uni but I think I need to give this another go. It really is a great bag but I got sick of a backpack so it only ever got used once or twice but I never sold it.
Thanks for bringing it back into my thoughts :lol:
Edit: If it matters, I had settled on a ThinkTank Urban Disguise 50 or 60 as the perfect shoulder bag, so using this again will save me a lot of money!
AlexeyK
6th of March 2010 (Sat), 02:05
Jdang:
With the belly strap it's no problem to sling it back and forth, though when it's full and heavy it is quite hard to balance it right. I usually take the camera out and walk with it when I know there can be something I can snap a shot of, and then put it back. If you don't fill it up so it's really heavy, there isn't any problem with slinging. I like to wear it quite low on my back, which makes the strap not stick to my shoulder quite right, and that was cumbersome. If you tighten it, like I tried just now, it was much easier.
Zelseman:
The 350 was slightly too large. It's wider, and with the shape of the bag (quite boxy, as you might see on the pics) it just looked too big/awkward for everyday school use. I realized that I wouldn't need any more space than there was in the 250.
Moose:
I know what you mean about a backpack, I had the same thoughts as well, I'm more of a shoulder bag type. But I found out that getting inserts for my messenger bag only was about 20$ cheaper than getting this one, and with the extra space I took it.
The UD-series look great, but they're so expensive, that's my problem..=\ The new retrospective look very nice as well though!
ChanTheMagicMan
6th of March 2010 (Sat), 03:56
I actually own this bag as well, and it's easily my favorite camera bag. I go hiking a lot, and the weight has never been an issue, especially once you use the front belt strap. It fits my body, 3 lenses, and a flash with ease. In addition, the water bottle mesh on the side is perfect, and the top compartment is roomy enough to fit spare batteries, microfiber cloths, and some snacks for the trail. My only complaints are that it does not include an all weather cover (minor gripe), and there's no dedicated tripod holder. I usually carry the tripod by hand, which is fine, since I have a lightweight tripod, but if I had a heavier one, I'd be more upset.
The best part about this bag is that when I travel, it fits my macbook pro on the side as well, and it fits underneath the seat on every plane I've tried it with thus far. I'm very pleased with it.
The Moose
6th of March 2010 (Sat), 07:22
Moose:
I know what you mean about a backpack, I had the same thoughts as well, I'm more of a shoulder bag type. But I found out that getting inserts for my messenger bag only was about 20$ cheaper than getting this one, and with the extra space I took it.
The UD-series look great, but they're so expensive, that's my problem..=\ The new retrospective look very nice as well though!
Definitely prefer shoulder bags but as we said, the only thing close to matching the Fastpack in terms of space (specifically the separate compartments) is the UD50/60 or the Lowepro Stealth Reporter 650 AW but they're both hideously expensive. I'm a sucker for compartments. I prefer things to be in their own spot rather than in together. That's what I've been doing with laptop and books in an Adidas sports bag but I just got sick of it. I'll give up the shoulder bag for usability and saving money, too!
zelseman
7th of March 2010 (Sun), 22:56
How tall are you? And how are you built? Large is relative you know? Thanks for all the help.
The Moose
8th of March 2010 (Mon), 00:20
How tall are you? And how are you built? Large is relative you know? Thanks for all the help.
Me? I'm about 175-180cm tall and a normal athletic build. I used my 250 today and it felt good. When wearing it, it feels smaller on than it actually is but as you said, that depends on the person. Also, you really don't even notice the weight with 1D2+24-70 and laptop in there. I didn't take my 70-200 but I wouldn't notice the difference. Also, I didn't feel any of the stiffness that people have mentioned when the laptop is in there. I thought it was comfortable.
Glad I gave this bag another go, it's going to be good!
AlexeyK
8th of March 2010 (Mon), 02:01
I haven't noticed any of the stiffness either, feels pretty good, so I'm not quite sure what those people are talking about. Over-sensitive back?
Zelzeman, I'm 6.1 and 220 pounds (185cm and 100 kg) or around there, normal/athletic build.
zelseman
11th of March 2010 (Thu), 03:01
Thanks for the measurements(as weird as that sounds). Im 6'3" 215, so I think im going to go try one of these out then decide from there. I appreciate the help.
regnis
1st of June 2010 (Tue), 02:52
thanks very much for this review! i'm picking this bag up today. i've seen photos of it fitting a 40D with 100-400 attached. Hope i'm not seeing things
cheers
mol_air
1st of June 2010 (Tue), 04:16
I went for the 350, because the 250 wouldn't fit my gripped 450d + 70-200 F4 + 1.4x extender attached. Even in the 350 it only fits just. Apparently the 100-400 is even longer than the 70-200 i have http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/canon-ef-100-400mm-f-4.5-5.6-l-is-usm-lens-review.aspx
So Im not so sure it will fit in the 250. Let us know if it does!
regnis
5th of June 2010 (Sat), 06:22
the 100-400 attached is not longer than the 70-200 + 1.4 attached
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.