zakmckracken
5th of July 2005 (Tue), 21:30
I have a Digital Rebel 300D and I recently bought a Canon EF 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 II USM lens to complement my "KIT" 18-55 lens. I chose this lens over the (in)famous Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III because of all the reviews and sample pictures around.
All in all I am very pleased with it, its very fast and sharp.
My question is... On the Canon website it says:
"(this lens is) ... ideal for digital SLRs–when used on the EOS Digital Rebel, it’s equivalent to an approx. 90-320mm lens."
Does this mean that its an actual 90-320 instead of 55-200 ? What does this statement mean ? If I zoom it all the way, will I get the same magnification as it would with a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III lens ?
Would I get more closer to the subject with the 75-300 lens ?
Thanks for any help :)
All in all I am very pleased with it, its very fast and sharp.
My question is... On the Canon website it says:
"(this lens is) ... ideal for digital SLRs–when used on the EOS Digital Rebel, it’s equivalent to an approx. 90-320mm lens."
Does this mean that its an actual 90-320 instead of 55-200 ? What does this statement mean ? If I zoom it all the way, will I get the same magnification as it would with a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III lens ?
Would I get more closer to the subject with the 75-300 lens ?
Thanks for any help :)