View Full Version : stupid ISO question
dontcallmeash
29th of August 2010 (Sun), 21:43
i'm under the impression, perhaps erroneously, that shooting with ISO settings between the usual 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 doesn't give any better noise performance than the ISO level directly above. (i.e. 500 or 600 doesn't look any better than 800 since it's not one of the main "incremental" settings and actually derived through some magic in the camera's software)...
can anyone clarify this?
theelectrician
29th of August 2010 (Sun), 21:46
Subscribing. I recall hearing something like this
dontcallmeash
31st of August 2010 (Tue), 18:51
no one knows?
ameerat42
31st of August 2010 (Tue), 20:46
Not so stupid!! Have a look at this thread 4 a start. Am.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=921790&highlight=intermediate+iso
texturemate
1st of September 2010 (Wed), 19:46
Hmm, thanks for the info, still learning how ISO affects my shooting.
dontcallmeash
2nd of September 2010 (Thu), 06:00
Not so stupid!! Have a look at this thread 4 a start. Am.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=921790&highlight=intermediate+iso
excellent. that's kind of what i thought was going on, i just couldn't explain it so well.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.