Bokeh -post your best pls [Archive] - Page 10 - Canon Digital Photography Forums

Lord_Malone

21st of July 2006 (Fri), 16:39

Nice thread and shots..... Maybe there be a thread on "post your best perspective shot" later on....:lol:

Here's my little contribution...:)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v389/Kkross/9ee569e0.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v389/Kkross/1e72e40f.jpg

Cheers.....

Such clean shots. Nice.

zed

21st of July 2006 (Fri), 23:46

http://paradigmimages.smugmug.com/photos/47388109-L.jpg

http://paradigmimages.smugmug.com/photos/83111068-L.jpg

http://paradigmimages.smugmug.com/photos/49295662-L.jpg

http://paradigmimages.smugmug.com/photos/73533283-L.jpg

grego

22nd of July 2006 (Sat), 05:09

50 1.4 rocks!

http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/354/audrey6211ck6.jpg

Mick Finn

22nd of July 2006 (Sat), 06:07

First shots with new 30D and 24-70 f2.8L

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a3/Micksphotos/IMG_0121-1.jpg

Lenzflair

22nd of July 2006 (Sat), 06:17

Heres mine

Lenzflair

22nd of July 2006 (Sat), 06:22

Image heres mine

Shimpu

22nd of July 2006 (Sat), 07:54

Mine...

cjm

22nd of July 2006 (Sat), 21:08

Dark subject? ISO 800, f2.8 140mm.

totalbeginner

23rd of July 2006 (Sun), 14:53

I'm not sure I really understand the concept of Bokeh. Do either of these qualify?

Fureinku

23rd of July 2006 (Sun), 16:28

Sister's wedding, 70-200 F/4L

http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/9704/61706011kt4.jpg

Tom_D

23rd of July 2006 (Sun), 17:02

I'm not sure I really understand the concept of Bokeh. Do either of these qualify?This is highly subjective. I would say your first post comes close and your second misses the mark.

More than just an out of focus (oof) background (or foreground) I think the oof area should not be recognizable and add to the over all quality of the picture.

In the first photo I find the oof background distracting (here we are in the subjective area). In the second I think it is just an oof background and not bokeh.

I would hope others would correct me if I have missed the mark.

Echo_

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 00:55

First post

Canon 350d
28-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS

http://imagesocket.com/images/bob1_copydd6.jpg

darktiger

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 12:42

http://themoores.zenfolio.com/img/p165848363-4.jpg

TenaCJed

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 14:05

Canon 28-105 II USM, 105mm @ f 4.5

http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n292/TenaCJed/Flowers%20-%20Plants/IMG_0195-01_Small.jpg

Cassie

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 14:33

Good to see this great thread still going.

kwsanders

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 15:34

First post

Canon 350d
28-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS

Beautiful shot! I love the background on this one. The colors are excellent.

Mr. Clean

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 16:48

Not my best but I figured I should participate by now!

IainUK

24th of July 2006 (Mon), 18:12

Here's mine 350D 24-70mm f2.8L

brayden2544

25th of July 2006 (Tue), 02:54

Just took these with the lens i got today that i ordered from keh for$60! Tamron 70-300mm

Carzee

25th of July 2006 (Tue), 06:41

Carzee

25th of July 2006 (Tue), 06:42

BTW on the 20th August this thread will mark its first birthday!

Should we try to do something special - bokeh wise??

Anthony J Howe

25th of July 2006 (Tue), 06:46

I haven't come across this thread before so I'll join in and picked one of my better shots of bokeh with a Jackdaw bird.
Camera 20D with 100-400mm lens.

In2Photos

25th of July 2006 (Tue), 08:06

Wow, hard to ignore the difference in bokeh between 1371 and 1372.

Great to see this thread going from strength to strength.

Be honest; who's read every page from 01 to 28 (on my count)?

:) My best thread.

Oddly enough they might both be from the same lens, the 24-70 L. I have read every page on here Carzee. Not all at one time though.;)

EDIT: Nope. The first is the Sigma 24-70.

basroil

29th of July 2006 (Sat), 14:36

guess i should post up one of my new favorites in bokeh.. just enough detail to see the mountain, but shallow enough for significant subject isolation

http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/7746/mg9844ih9.jpg

michaelj

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 08:03

A couple taken with the Canon 50mm f1.8
98063
98064

michaelj

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 08:04

and a couple with the Canon 100mm f2.8 macro
98065
98066

Jetmech1

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 09:21

and a couple with the Canon 100mm f2.8 macro
98065
98066

The 100mm 2.8 has some nice bokeh. Don't care for the 50mm 1.8 bokeh even though they are some nice shots.

johnathan

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 11:21

Here is a shot from the Fort Worth Botanical gardens yesterday. I was using my 350XT and my 100-400L . Johnathan

http://johnathan.smugmug.com/photos/84696287-L.jpg

Jetmech1

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 12:08

Here is a shot from the Fort Worth Botanical gardens yesterday. I was using my 350XT and my 100-400L . Johnathan

http://johnathan.smugmug.com/photos/84696287-L.jpg

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Calzinger

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 13:22

lousy shot here, just for bokeh ;)

http://calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/plants/960.640._MG_0390.jpg

johnathan

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 13:24

Jetmech1

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 18:46

Thanks Jetmech1
That was at 400mm at 6 feet. I love this lens and previously owned a 70-200F4 with the same type of bokeh.How do you like your 17-40's bokeh ? I see your in Charlotte. Do you work for the major carrier there? I work for the major at DFW. I am a jetmech also ha ha. Johnathan

To be honest I have not tested the bokeh on my 17-40, but I love it on my 50mm 1.4 and 85mm 1.8. I work for a (semi) major cargo airline. AA is the major carrier out of Dallas?????? Glad to see a few other jetmech's hanging around here.

pfogle

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 18:52

this is from a 1967 Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm at f5.6 and f2.8

http://www.philfogle.com/images/chrysanthemum%202.jpg
http://www.philfogle.com/images/chrysanthemum%201.jpg

Dan-o

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 20:24

:lol:

http://www.stantoneagles.com/me/corona.jpg

Hermeto

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 23:27

Nice bokeh (IMHO), although kind of distractive:

http://i.pbase.com/o4/00/644000/1/63686803.zO1eshJ8.IMG_4554.jpg

Butt ugly bokeh:

http://i.pbase.com/o4/00/644000/1/63689872.TAFt17Gq.IMG_4555_A.jpg

sunbeast

30th of July 2006 (Sun), 23:34

Backyard shot...

98306

tpfoo

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 01:17

EF 28-80 F3.5-5.6, reverse mounted.

grego

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 01:24

Fun with bottles. I was trying to show a buddy how depth of field works, but bottles are fun to play with. 50 1.4 @ 1.4

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/greg9683/Photo%20Examples/IMG_80571_4.jpg

momentz

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 03:01

Hope this qualifies: EF-S 50mm F1.8 II :)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/evobit/IMG_5497.jpg

Nikolas

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 07:01

Certainly not the best but I like the colours.
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~smeegles/Stuff/lenstests/Takumar.jpg

Jaime

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 19:44

Posting another one I did recently.

I hope you like it.

http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7228/liriotr0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Travis F

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 21:09

A little different.

I purposely put my daughter OOF on this one. I think that I used my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 DG.

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y150/LX200/Various/IMG_6637.jpg

Travis

leemik

31st of July 2006 (Mon), 22:18

http://static.flickr.com/71/185192907_67951b05fd_o.jpg

ean36

1st of August 2006 (Tue), 06:17

Shot with 20D, 70-200@2.8 (70-200@2.8), 200mm, 1/800, ISO100.

Lotto

1st of August 2006 (Tue), 07:02

Through the display glass: 50 mm F1.4 @ 2.2, ISO 800

cjm

3rd of August 2006 (Thu), 23:17

Check the blur on this. I used a 70-200mm f4 L and 1.4x extender L and shot at f5.6! Amazing!

kwsanders

4th of August 2006 (Fri), 22:57

I purposely put my daughter OOF on this one. I think that I used my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 DG.

Fantastic shot! Spot on, Travis!

holland_patrick

4th of August 2006 (Fri), 23:20

First try
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y136/holland_patrick/IMG_5494.jpg

busterboy

4th of August 2006 (Fri), 23:53

http://www.timprocter.co.uk/photography/bird-table/woody-frame.jpg

SubDude3000

5th of August 2006 (Sat), 00:47

http://static.flickr.com/59/153847674_e07652d258.jpg

Please let me know what you think. (sad puppy face)

Jon

5th of August 2006 (Sat), 21:44

Photographing some newly-rescued Pekes for our web site (http://www.potomacpekes.org/rescues). Tanner's looking for a new home, BTW. 70-200 f/2.8 at f/4 1/60, kicker flash from the 580EX.

Canon_Bob

5th of August 2006 (Sat), 23:37

http://home.comcast.net/~bob.blanchard/flowers1.jpg

Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II: ISO 100, 1/320th, f/4.5, 24-70 2.8L @ 70mm

madjack

5th of August 2006 (Sat), 23:38

http://madjack.smugmug.com/photos/86038669-M.jpg

kiss_me_now9

11th of August 2006 (Fri), 19:42

Newbie question - Would this count? It's incredibly boring (it's a piece of wood... :p) but I was just wondering. Taken with a point and shoot. (Click for bigger)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v518/kiss_me_now9/th_Windsor0671.jpg (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v518/kiss_me_now9/Windsor0671.jpg)

Some really beautiful pictures here!

Reefbone

11th of August 2006 (Fri), 21:53

ALERT ALERT - n00b post

Does this count as brokeh? And is brokeh short for something?

Ohio State Stadium 17-85mm f/4.5 @28mm 1/400

http://static.flickr.com/78/208018036_2fd7163065.jpg

Kallyloo

12th of August 2006 (Sat), 06:46

Shot with the Tamron 90mm macro, this lens gives some of the best bokeh I've seen.

http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-4/1175899/Allysum2IMG_0690AJPG.jpg

Calzinger

12th of August 2006 (Sat), 09:31

NYC POTN Meet: New York Botanical Gardens

bloom
http://calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/ny_botanical_gardens/576.864.IMG_2176_bloom.jpg

SOX 404

12th of August 2006 (Sat), 13:38

Here's mine.....

http://ajogi.smugmug.com/photos/86426649-L.jpg

J T

12th of August 2006 (Sat), 13:54

A bolt on an old railroad trestle.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17/jimthias/Structures/BridgeBolt-3574.jpg

sando

14th of August 2006 (Mon), 22:12

I'll play, not my favourite shot, but loads of Bokeh in the bag:

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i228/sando3/DSCF2473a.jpg

Jim Victory

14th of August 2006 (Mon), 22:50

Here is a couple.

http://www.victoryphoto.net/Flowers/img_0733p_std.jpg

http://www.victoryphoto.net/Birds/_x2x1064wp_std.jpg

odvdveer

15th of August 2006 (Tue), 01:38

Nice bird, great contract with the light background! What is it?

Olga

Jim Victory

15th of August 2006 (Tue), 01:50

Nice bird, great contract with the light background! What is it?

Olga

Thanks!

It is a male Red-Winged Blackbird.

Freddy Flash

15th of August 2006 (Tue), 02:23

Here's the first thing I've taken were I've played with boken. Heck, it's my first post over here too. I really enjoy y'alls forum BTW, good stuff :D

http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h67/Freddy_Flash/TriciaNbird.jpg

Hindsight makes me wish I would have changed the angle of the shot better so that the backround wasn't so dark against the bird's head. But that's hindsight for you lol. I liked how the foreground ended up too. Being new to having a DSLR I'm still kinda "feeling out" depth of field versus the point and shoot I'd been playing with for a while.

BTW the lighting in the pet store here sucks, I kept to pretty low apetures all day :( Don't get me wrong, it worked for some shots. Others though ran a bit softer than I really wanted too.

dylanjones

16th of August 2006 (Wed), 11:38

Hello, This is my first post, so just a quick cheer for such an informative site.

Recently bought an old 80-200mm Canon. Its almost older than me I do believe, yet I am happy with the background blur.

Below is an f2.8 image that I took whilst getting to grips with it:

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j189/funkydylbo/pot-01.jpg

Dylan

Stavhp

16th of August 2006 (Wed), 11:49

not my best but one i found earlier:)
http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f321/Stav13/20060429_IMG_0156.jpg

michael_

5th of September 2006 (Tue), 03:51

my current from late last week

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7338/mg4234copyht9.jpg

Carzee

5th of September 2006 (Tue), 04:09

Thx all and keep it up.

I was away for a while and missed the first anniversary of the thread.

Getting another lens soon and may have to post some new samples.

Pete

5th of September 2006 (Tue), 04:11

Slightly stretching the concept of "bokeh" here, but I was pleased by the effect. The shapes are huge round bales of hay in a field.
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a294/peteghia/Scotland-2006/IMG_1832.jpg

Phonetic

5th of September 2006 (Tue), 05:08

I'll play once again. 70-200L IS at f/2.8.

http://www.galaxies.dk/gallery/mannequin.jpg

baybud

5th of September 2006 (Tue), 05:40

I probably have some better ones but i'll just put this on as i needed to test how to upload anyway.

Shot with 3002.8IS + 20d.

matthewlrigdon

5th of September 2006 (Tue), 07:09

I'll give it a whirl. Both taken with the 50 1.4 wide open.

107618
107619

ChopstickHero

20th of September 2006 (Wed), 20:57

some recent bokeh shots with 17-55:

http://images19.fotki.com/v22/photos/7/73230/3141062/16_flower_MLAW-vi.jpg

http://images18.fotki.com/v86/photos/7/73230/3141062/15_downlow_MLAW-vi.jpg

MitsuJDM

20th of September 2006 (Wed), 21:19

50mm @ F/1.8
http://img378.imageshack.us/img378/1976/img4274lt0.jpg

MitsuJDM

20th of September 2006 (Wed), 21:19

300mm @ F/5.6
http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/4572/img4626pt9.jpg

Fureinku

20th of September 2006 (Wed), 21:24

70-200mm F4L, a lil blurry, it was dark, and the grounds prohibited tripods :(

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/6281/920060041vp8.jpg

narlus

20th of September 2006 (Wed), 21:27

butterfly, 50 f/1.4 wide open (in retrospect, i should have stopped it down a tad to get the entire insect in focus)

http://narlus.zenfolio.com/img/p410124943-4.jpg

bmynbr

21st of September 2006 (Thu), 01:52

Here are a couple of flowers I took this summer.

bmynbr

21st of September 2006 (Thu), 01:53

And here is a pic of my son in front of the hoodoo's in Drumheller Alberta

jorj7

21st of September 2006 (Thu), 02:31

http://sis24.berkeley.edu/view/060426-Birds/images/0426-164105-01.jpg
Sigma 120-300, 274mm, f4.5, 1/1250 sec, ISO 400, AV mode.

sando

21st of September 2006 (Thu), 03:03

@ Jorj7: :shock: Now that's the definition of Bokeh! :cool:

My attempt.

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i228/sando3/DSCF3016b.jpg
f/3.2 | 1/200s | iso400 | 380mm

edit: I think I already posted in this thread too... anyone know where it went??

conflictingALIBI

21st of September 2006 (Thu), 04:19

Just a pic when I was messing around w/ my 50mm 1.8 when I first got it...

f/2.2

snboarder99

22nd of September 2006 (Fri), 15:04

heres mine. i dont remember what focal length/aperture I used. scanned print.

http://static.flickr.com/69/191315042_661a43cf8a_o.jpg

malla1962

22nd of September 2006 (Fri), 15:16

With 300f2.8Lis.
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q0448.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q0454.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q0455.jpg

surfologist

22nd of September 2006 (Fri), 15:20

Perfect pic of the pooch malla!!

now you need to get one of your dog running with you on the side, and pan so that you get a motion blurred b/g!!!

glowie

26th of September 2006 (Tue), 22:13

My Tofu eating contest trophy

112647

tsaraleksi

26th of September 2006 (Tue), 23:04

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6808/mg9181zi0.jpg

peanuthead

26th of September 2006 (Tue), 23:05

First pic of my girl taken with 50mm at 1.8, second pic taken with 85mm at 1.8
In the second pic, looking at the carpet shows how narrow the DOF was.

surfologist

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 13:25

Just a random pic taken while camping.... lolol
named: "nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks" for all you panic! at the disco fans...
haha

baybud

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 16:05

Just one taken with the 85L @1.2, when i had the 1d mark II N, i just liked the vibrancy of the tulips, i wouldn't say its a decent photo.

surfologist

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 18:45

beautiful tulpis, i cant believe the color is so bright... how much PP did you do?
I can see a little bit, but cant tell it that is just the IQ from compressing

Kagemaru

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 18:53

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6808/mg9181zi0.jpg

This photo is amazing. It doesn't even look real.
Coincidentally by contribution is of the same subject matter.

I took this the day after I got my 1.4

baybud

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 19:39

beautiful tulpis, i cant believe the color is so bright... how much PP did you do?
I can see a little bit, but cant tell it that is just the IQ from compressing

i'll be honest i did up the saturation levels "very little" prior to saving for POTN.
I am also unsure if the source was from a raw or a jpeg, when originally shot, as a rule i tend not to do to much PP, so i would say the colours are about 80-90% accurate as far as saturation goes. They were especially beautiful tulips lol

surfologist

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 19:44

Yea.. they really do look good!
great shot!

In2Photos

27th of September 2006 (Wed), 19:55

I just posted this pic in the people forum but it needed to be displayed here as well.

XT, EF 70-210 f/3.5-4.5, ISO 400, 1/1250, f/5, +2/3 EC
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=112851&d=1159401098

kwsanders

28th of September 2006 (Thu), 16:19

Great photo, Mike. The bokeh is excellent. Wife and daughter?

Double Negative

28th of September 2006 (Thu), 16:45

image

Wow. That is unreal. What was in the background to produce that?! :shock:

In2Photos

28th of September 2006 (Thu), 16:50

Great photo, Mike. The bokeh is excellent. Wife and daughter?
Thanks. And that is from a $165 lens.:p That is my wife and daughter.

Adi7r

28th of September 2006 (Thu), 16:59

Here's one I posted a few months ago. Not sure if it's my best though.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=196707&highlight=adi7r

japanviking

30th of September 2006 (Sat), 23:48

A fellow photographer at the MotoGP race at Motegi.
Taken with my 300 2.8 Lis +1.4tc wide open @F4

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a61/japanviking/_MG_0806w.jpg

kfry

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 00:54

http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l99/stevenyphotography/IMG_3173ppresize.jpg

idk, i jus really like this one.

JaGWiRE

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 01:03

http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l99/stevenyphotography/IMG_3173ppresize.jpg

idk, i jus really like this one.

Heads are just big dots, right?

Japan, what's holding the camera in that photo?

japanviking

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 01:44

Japan, what's holding the camera in that photo?

The camera is on a monopod held in his hand.

JaGWiRE

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 01:46

The camera is on a monopod held in his hand.

Perhaps the lens is on a monopod? All I see is the camera with the straps and air below it (or bokeh.)

japanviking

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 02:48

I meant the lens :-)

JaGWiRE

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 02:54

I meant the lens :-)

That explain's it all :D. What was he shooting with? :). I think I see Nikon on that camera :D.

japanviking

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 03:02

He was using a Nikon 400 2.8 with extender.
I have never seen so many large lenses used at a motorsport event before.
Many guys carried 500 4L's or 600 4L's.

busterboy

1st of October 2006 (Sun), 03:04

http://www.timprocter.co.uk/photography/bird-table/blue~tit.jpg

kwsanders

3rd of October 2006 (Tue), 16:27

Beautiful shot, Tim. The colors are fantastic on this shot and the bokeh is oh so creamy! :)

laimis.s

3rd of October 2006 (Tue), 17:47

oh well i might as well contribute to this thread :) one of my first test shots with 400d. EXIF data embedded!

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/4050/img0063croppedkt6.jpg

radiohead

3rd of October 2006 (Tue), 17:54

A couple from me:

http://static.flickr.com/87/251396346_b56434a03b_o.jpg

http://static.flickr.com/103/251366016_1d40ca6207_o.jpg

jupiterfish

3rd of October 2006 (Tue), 20:03

a few of mine with my 50 1.4

http://www.jupiterfish.com/landscapes_files/shave3.jpg

http://www.jupiterfish.com/portraits_files/pup2.jpg

baybud

3rd of October 2006 (Tue), 22:22

http://www.timprocter.co.uk/photography/bird-table/blue~tit.jpg

thats a lovely pic, i just love tit's "lol that sounded a bit dirty" I love there robotic movements, superb animal.

Heatseeker99

4th of October 2006 (Wed), 00:04

My contribution. Tamron 17-50, shot at f/2.8 50mm

DC9

4th of October 2006 (Wed), 01:35

Lens - Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS with 1.4 Tele Extender
Focal Length - 280mm
Aperture - 4.0
ISO - 100
Shutter - 1/400
PhotoShop - None

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c368/AV8OR/JN.jpg

============================

Lens - Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS with 1.4 Tele Extender
Focal Length - 195mm
Aperture - 4.0
ISO - 100
Shutter - 1/1000
PhotoShop - None

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c368/AV8OR/CS.jpg

Lani Kai

4th of October 2006 (Wed), 04:27

135mm f/2L at f/2
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/5272/img4364re7.jpg

Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro at f/6.3
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/9373/img3718xc7.jpg

at f/2.8
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/9165/img0995td6.jpg

andym172

4th of October 2006 (Wed), 14:51

My first photo with my new 85mm 1.2 mkII:

http://static.flickr.com/80/260709285_9884d4ad95_o.jpg

JaGWiRE

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 13:29

I thought this shot came out cool, first day with the nifty fifty :). Shot wide open at 1/60 sec ISO 100

http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m276/JaGWiREE/Flowersmallsize8bit.jpg

Janika

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 13:37

Shot this last SUmmer with my 70-200 f/4 L @ f/4.0

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b186/Janika2/Animals/Just-like-that.jpg

busterboy

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 14:37

While we are looking at Squirrels here is one I took earlier..:)

http://www.timprocter.co.uk/photography/squirrel/squirrel=5.jpg

In2Photos

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 14:39

So its squirrels we are after:

EDIT: Forgot to say this was with my XT, 70-210 f/3.5-4.5 lens, 210mm, 1/80 (steady hand), ISO400, f/4.5.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=109943&d=1158288894

Janika

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 14:54

Nice shots guys! How about this?! :) Also shot with my 70-200 f/4L

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b186/Janika2/Animals/ChipChopMonk2.jpg

volleybrad

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 14:58

The official Squirrel Bokeh thread. :)
http://chanwahyaoh.smugmug.com/photos/68158642-L.jpg

Buggbairn

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 18:04

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v344/weejoe/IMG_3600.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v344/weejoe/IMG_3692.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v344/weejoe/IMG_3571.jpg

joe445

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 18:05

Get a load of this little guy!
http://i12.tinypic.com/2w7g1v6.jpg

cali

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 18:20

http://static.flickr.com/122/261767227_9b70a9502f.jpg

will1563

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 20:21

17-85 IS

TMR Design

5th of October 2006 (Thu), 20:32

A sunny day in the park. This guy cooperated and did not move while I was shooting.

Adi7r

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 08:05

350D Bigma
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=97448&d=1154019803

busterboy

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 08:32

So its squirrels we are after:

Can't argue with that..:D

http://www.timprocter.co.uk/photography/squirrel/squirrel=4.jpg

Graphyfotoz

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 09:33

Hehehe you want my best? :D

Dude I've done very well when it comes to BOKEH!!

And these were ALL done with my Sigma EX DG APO OS f4.5-5-6 80-400mm which isn't even a macro lens nor fast!!
Who needs a expensive L lens?? :lol:

http://graphyfotoz.smugmug.com/photos/100614040-M-1.jpg

http://graphyfotoz.smugmug.com/photos/99735008-M.jpg

http://graphyfotoz.smugmug.com/photos/95948549-M.jpg http://graphyfotoz.smugmug.com/photos/97553629-M.jpg

http://graphyfotoz.smugmug.com/photos/94206097-M.jpg http://graphyfotoz.smugmug.com/photos/84638384-M.jpg

PetKal

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 09:47

You want tree shark bokeh ? Not a problem, here they are, off the cuff.;)

PetKal

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 09:48

Two more.

JaGWiRE

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 09:49

Where do you guys find all these squirrels?

PetKal

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 09:52

Where do you guys find all these squirrels?
Like.... my backyard ?:D Way too many gray ones. A pair of red ones .

surfologist

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 09:57

Like.... my backyard ?:D Way too many gray ones. A pair of red ones .

My backyard.... and its about a 60foot by 40 foot small area!

Although, laeley, there have not been very many, they are all sleeping i guess. I saw one the other day and he had HUGE cheeks, i only wish i had my camera!!!!

surfologist

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 10:06

Two more.

I love the second one.. the trees, and the leaves really make that photo great. Even though it is of some nutty squirrel!! :)

PetKal

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 10:07

I saw one the other day and he had HUGE cheeks, i only wish i had my camera!!!!

Geez.....thankfully, I had my camera ready for that one with huge cheeks.;)

PetKal

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 10:24

Here is an example of that dreary winter bokeh.

Please note: much of whatever little I happen to know about bokeh today I owe to Ronald S.Jr. who supplied me with guidance and counsel in that regard many months ago. :D

surfologist

8th of October 2006 (Sun), 10:24

Geez.....thankfully, I had my camera ready for that one with huge cheeks.;)

Hes got that "no i didnt eat that last cookie" look:D