Bokeh -post your best pls

[chuckandbob]

Not my best - but a shot from a brand new 85mm 1.2L.
http://www.danablan.com/jakebokeh.jpg

[Eagle]

Not my best - but a shot from a brand new 85mm 1.2L.

That's nice. I really like the way the colors turned out.

[JaGWiRE]

Not my best - but a shot from a brand new 85mm 1.2L.
http://www.danablan.com/jakebokeh.jpg

That shows off the lenses great contrast, saturated / vivid colors, and shallow DOF. Nice work, and cute dog too!

[chuckandbob]

Thanks - all available light, and a little tweaking (shot RAW) in Lightroom.

[thekid24]

good ol 85 1.8

[AeroSmith]

EF 100 macro at f/18.


http://AeroSmith.smugmug.com/photos/136905602-L.jpg

[Fade2]

Muhsin Muhammad, that's why they call him Moose, and not Mush;)

Nice shot!

MOOOOSSSEEEEE!!!! lol
Thank you

[orisky]

With the 85 1.8.


http://orisky.smugmug.com/photos/124067061-L-1.jpg

[fWord]

Well I haven't done too many of such selective-focus work, and really should get down to making more of these pictures. But out of the very limited photos I have, here's a sample from the Voigtlander 125mm f/2.5 SL macro lens:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v51/s1ckpuppy/Blogger/326V9493.jpg

[coorz]

5D + 135L + Kenko 1.4 @f8
http://www.displayfreak.com/5d/IMG_3267.jpg

5D + 135L @f2.2
http://www.displayfreak.com/5d/IMG_3340.jpg

[Nick_C]

A boring subject, would have been better if the flower was out.

Sigma 55-200 @ 200mm F/5.6 (wideopen)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/232/448455636_84201ea6d2_o.jpg

Nick :-)

[tsaraleksi]

http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/995/mg2267zs6.jpg

[PeacePlanet]

Bill my dog taken with my 200 mm prime
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/stephen.bates590/bill1.jpg


WOW ... a superb action !!! Happy all around for sure...

Thanks for sharing

[Pete]

Fairly pleased with this, even when the 100-400 isn't known for great bokeh.

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_2129.jpg

[TomMessenger:Photo]

50mm 1.8 to the max

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e321/messy_da_legend/Trowelresize.jpg

[coorz]

The much criticized EF50mm f/1.2L @ f2.2

http://www.displayfreak.com/5d/IMG_3554.jpg

[Pekka]

Hi coorz, nice! Do you have similar 1.2 samples?

[coorz]

Hi coorz, nice! Do you have similar 1.2 samples?
No real world f1.2 pix as i've been unable to shoot anything decent at that aperture :oops:
I only have some f1.2 shots of still objects.

[Sharpstat]

Shot with the 70-200mm 2.8 IS
I was out walking one day and saw this in the yard.


http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/1228/dollinswingqy7.jpg

[VesselinG]

that has to be it...

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y130/hypo/IMG_9209.jpg

[Eagle]

that has to be it...

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y130/hypo/IMG_9209.jpg

That's it alright!

What is the background?

[blam]

a tree I am guessing

[VesselinG]

Yes, trees :)

[Marydoright]

poor Easter bunny;)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v340/marydoright/Easter2007038copy.jpg

[Lord_Malone]

Hi coorz, nice! Do you have similar 1.2 samples?

I'll try to post some 50L samples later.

[dilorenzo1954]

Lilac buds

[crispypie]

Bluebells, but which lens?

165712

165713

[Lyngarth]

Taken with a 70-200 F2.8L

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i225/lyngarth/Bad-breath.jpg

[Nick_C]

Taken with a 70-200 F2.8L



Damn!! looks like he was about to have that guy for lunch, did he make it out alive? lol :D

Nick :-)

[MagicallyDelicious]

taken on the river boyne ireland.

[snowrdr]

70-200mm f/4L IS :D

http://www.pbase.com/image/77291294.jpg

[stevieboy378]

Bluebells, but which lens?

The 50mm 1.8 ?

[Nick_C]

Seen a lot of 70-200L's so far, now for something right at the other end of the market.

No fancy duck shots, just a frame from a hanging basket for now :-p

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/175/467383614_ea9e843e9c_o.jpg

Nick :-)

[crispypie]

Nope!

[S.Horton]

http://midnightblue.smugmug.com/photos/143790840-M-3.jpg

[MischiefK9s]

Taken with 70-200mm f2.8L IS.

[_aravena]

http://a182.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/6/l_6675500fa8e2093db065ee7ace5fef35.jpg

Not as good a many on here, but I loved the moment.

[snowrdr]

Taken with 70-200mm f2.8L IS.

Awesome capture Gayle!
I've spent a few hrs with my new 70-200mm f/4 IS trying to get a shot like that... unsuccessful so far. :rolleyes:

[misspix]

Mind if I pop in? :) Taken with 60mm Macro
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k259/miss-pix/Nature/IMG_1891-01.jpg

[Lord_Malone]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/407/cag3209edit2vp7.jpg

[almo]

I have more than one. I hope this is ok.

There were all shot with a Canon D30 and various lenses...

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a183/almoagain/D30/Animals/Insects/52451045.jpg

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a183/almoagain/D30/Animals/Insects/2561014.jpg

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a183/almoagain/D30/Animals/Insects/25641034.jpg

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a183/almoagain/D30/Animals/Herps/364641023.jpg

[august23]

meh.......

http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n316/yandoli/IMG_0190.jpg

http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n316/yandoli/IMG_0011.jpg

http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n316/yandoli/IMG_0172.jpg

[anglefire]

My best bokah for the moment are these two - shame the purch is a not a twig!

http://www.mark.colston-online.co.uk/links/robin.jpg

http://www.mark.colston-online.co.uk/links/robin1.jpg

[jwtex]

One of my first shots taken with my new 30D and 70-200L 2.8

[EcoRick]

Not my best, but just taken with the oft maligned, 24-105L.

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p192/EcoRick/Aprilpatioflowers-3.jpg

[Lord_Malone]

meh.......





http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n316/yandoli/IMG_0172.jpg

;)

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3712/img0172dq5.jpg

[Nick_C]

I prefer the original shot, it had a warm glow to it.

Nick :-)

[Katzer1]

I have 2 with very similar subjects:)

Taken with the Sigma 150 Macro:
http://i.pbase.com/o6/09/731009/1/74489316.W275PCWR.IMG_0226.JPG

With the Bigma:
http://i.pbase.com/g6/09/731009/2/73748389.W0jibzni.jpg

and one more where i actually tried "work with the backgournd".
http://i.pbase.com/o6/09/731009/1/77263544.2XZdB1XW.IMG_1304.jpg

Erez

[Lord_Malone]

I prefer the original shot, it had a warm glow to it.

Nick :-)

The warmer cast definitely sets the tone for the image, but I just couldn't resists screwing around with a self portrait of August23. ;)

[august23]

The warmer cast definitely sets the tone for the image, but I just couldn't resists screwing around with a self portrait of August23. ;)

That aint me ya silly twit. :p

[Jamdiver]

Bokeh so nice :).
Got to love the 60mm f/2.8 :-)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/218/467887649_7fff86ab7d.jpg

Duotone bokeh?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/220/454931789_c4f5b36c66.jpg

Red on yellow

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/446311565_4b9eba3d6d.jpg

Bokeh overload?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/199/461679632_e6883970b5.jpg

Field of yellow. - Last two are shot with the Sigma 70-300mm

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/173/458832677_ab25da3717.jpg

Circle

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/241/458860663_6ebfd5a51e.jpg

[mntbikejack]

My daughter holding a barbie doll.

http://QuantumPics.smugmug.com/photos/146527130-L.jpg

[gymell]

There are some really nice shots here. Allow me to present my latest contribution to "bird butts of the world".

http://www.pbase.com/gymell/image/77654370/original.jpg

[moomike]

A bokeh overload one from me.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v636/Moomike_geckoworks/Marmot_blend_001.jpg

[H8Monday]

http://h8monday.smugmug.com/photos/144807005-L.jpg

The 70-200 2.8 strikes again.

[Sathi]

Jamdiver those are stellar...very nice.

That squirrel shot is amazing moomike. What lens?

[Greg_C]

Some recent Bohek from last weekend.

http://www.steadyhands.net/photogallery/albums/temp/image20260.jpg

[ayreonaut]

XTi, 50/1.8

my girl Lydia
166802

[dilorenzo1954]

Great capture moomike:D !

[atom]

With my old Powershot G3:

http://www.picpile.net/ims/pic_35ZLqZS/7456.jpg

http://www.picpile.net/ims/pic_35ZLqZS/7458.jpg

http://www.picpile.net/ims/pic_35ZLqZS/7459.jpg

http://www.picpile.net/ims/pic_35ZLqZS/7453.jpg

[snowrdr]

This is from my 70-200mm f/4L IS shot at f/5.0

http://www.pbase.com/image/77579663.jpg

[timbop]

It's not the best, but what the heck:
http://www.goprices.net/poconos/images/IMG_6590_fin.jpg

[Rhinotherunt]

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t66/Ryan_McGill/CRW_2090.jpg

[moomike]

Jamdiver those are stellar...very nice.

That squirrel shot is amazing moomike. What lens?

Great capture moomike:D !

Cheers Sathi & "Ed" :) taken with the 300 2.8 IS & 2x convertor (sorry, should have written in post)

[Cerbera LM]

http://alhibma.smugmug.com/photos/147609266-L.jpg

f2.8
200mm from a 70-200

http://alhibma.smugmug.com/photos/147609618-L.jpg

f2.8
70mm from a 70-200

[justisnmnz]

This is from my 70-200mm f/4L IS shot at f/5.0

http://www.pbase.com/image/77579663.jpg

makes me miss my 70-200 f/4L :(

[Spoolin]

100 2.8 on 30D with 68mm of Kenko tubes:

http://www.chrisbennyimaging.com/photography/drops.jpg

Chris.

[Montec]

One from today

[dilorenzo1954]

From last weekend...

[Anke]

One of the comments I received on this one called it "creamy" :D

http://www.ankehuber.plus.com/potn/kestrel.jpg

[forno]

ISO100 f/5.6 1/200th
http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/7894/20070429img0619so8.jpg
ISO100 f/5.6 1/200th
http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/593/20070429img0610mp8.jpg

[SeattleSpeedster]

This is in a park in Beijing as the sun sets with all the haze in the air...and a thornybush in front:

http://home.comcast.net/~michaelfreid/bushsunset4.jpg

[airbutchie]

Great pictures everyone... Here's my contribution:

Miniture Golf Bokeh:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v467/airbutchie/Photography/Miniture-Golf.jpg

- airbutchie :D

[Space]

I'll give it a shot.

[peacock]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/valentine1/Misc/IMG_4437r800.jpg

[deltroid]

100mm Macro, f2.8

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/159/376952430_5ea83a4e11.jpg

Gorgeous Picture!

I won't post a picture because I honestly do not understand the concept of a "good bokeh" versus a "bad bokeh". :-P

[blue_river]

Here are a couple with the kit lens.

[Jman13]

My 105 macro probably has the best bokeh of my current lens lineup, though the 80-200L and 50 f/1.4 are pretty nice as well.

Here's a shot (if somewhat noisy) from the Sigma 105, taken at (I believe) f/10...., ISO 1250

http://www.jordansteele.com/images/recent/bluebell_bug1.jpg

[justisnmnz]

http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/8316/82406random022copyxm8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

from back when I first had the 70-200 f/4L

[Katzer1]

http://img462.imageshack.us/img462/8316/82406random022copyxm8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

from back when I first had the 70-200 f/4L
Fantastic shot!

[zara]

85L on a recent outing

[mb7]

Here is a couple I got with my 50 f/1.4

[EcoRick]

I just liked the way this turned out.

http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p192/EcoRick/Crabapple.jpg

[Jarrad]

Gorgeous Picture!

Thank you very much :)

[Jarrad]

100 2.8 on 30D with 68mm of Kenko tubes:

http://www.chrisbennyimaging.com/photography/drops.jpg

Chris.


Outstanding work, Chris!

:)

[Newbie1981]

http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/6793/img0387oh7.th.jpg (http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0387oh7.jpg)


http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/4940/img0409zj1.th.jpg (http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0409zj1.jpg)

[aRJun]

My best till date with my nifty fifty:

http://arjun.smugmug.com/photos/146728439-L.jpg

[ghibli99]

Holy... wow! What a thread! My meager contribution (EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM):

http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l131/mmotoda/20070422ortrip/20070417ore02sm.jpg

-Mike

[justisnmnz]

One more from my old (and sadly missed) 70-200 f/4L

http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/61/913010copy4bd4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[ChrisBlaze]

85mm 1.2 mk 1
no pp
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d77/rickrockin/QB9K9501.jpg

[SeattleSpeedster]

wine is good

[bowlesbe]

Bluebells, but which lens?

165712

165713

That was the 50 f/1.8 you can tell by the shape of the highlights

[jdos2]

This ain't the best, but it's some of the most.

35mm f/1.4, wide open, with the best bokeh challenge: Near focus subject with distance being nearly infinity, and complicated.


Notice the double-line (Ni-sen). Also notice how folks (rightfully) rave about the lens. There's always more than one factor at play.

[Technophile]

canon 100mm macro, iso400, f/8, 1/250

its a western fence lizard that i caught (those arent my fingers, btw). i think part of the sky and a blue canopy was in the background. if i remember right, i applied some USM, contrast and adjusted the temp/saturation.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/170/479287340_672dea493a.jpg

[freddyco]

A2 size of this bokeh looks nice on my wall.

http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w40/freddyco/EF35mm%2014L/flower2.jpg

[TimSewell]

Haven't looked through the 167 pages of this thread but can I just point out that 'bokeh' refers to out of focus specular highlights, and how they appear given the characteristics of the lens and its aperture blade configuration - not just out of focus backgrounds.

Not to say that there aren't some lovely shots here but most of them don't particularly show bokeh.

[In2Photos]

Haven't looked through the 167 pages of this thread but can I just point out that 'bokeh' refers to out of focus specular highlights, and how they appear given the characteristics of the lens and its aperture blade configuration - not just out of focus backgrounds.

Not to say that there aren't some lovely shots here but most of them don't particularly show bokeh.
I disagree. Bokeh does not specifically mean OOF specular highlights. Specular highlights are the easiest places to determine the quality of the OOF areas because they appear as bright spots that should fade on the outside (good bokeh) or have a dark ring on the outside (bad bokeh). Have a read here:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/bokeh.shtml

An exert:
Boke, the quality of the out-of-focus image...

[bdpAKAknox]

My pure bred Jack Russell.
17mm, f/2.8
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/6863/chase17mm031ua1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[malla1962]

From my 300f2.8Lis:D

[bdpAKAknox]

That shot could be interpreted in a few different ways.

[ChrisBlaze]

http://www.chrisblaze.smugmug.com/photos/129776570-L.jpg

[freddyco]

That shot could be interpreted in a few different ways.

LOL :lol:

[Eagle]

From my 300f2.8Lis:D

That shot could be interpreted in a few different ways.

That's the funniest theing I've seen in a long time. I about lost it when I scolled down and seen the two balls.:lol::lol::lol::lol:

[blam]

That shot could be interpreted in a few different ways.

oh snap.....

[angryhampster]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/angryhampster/artistic/aprilflower1.jpg

[JaGWiRE]

oh snap.....
Damnnn!

[divinemethod]

nothing like the 85 L, but here's something i just snapped from a very scattered andbusy tree.

http://divinemethod.zenfolio.com/img/p687454218-4.jpg

[driverdave]

50mm f1.8

[Amichore]

I've been experimenting with my EF 50 1.4 USM that I recently purchased and must confess I think it has issues. It's not quite as sharp as I expected. I'm not sure if I am just paranoid or whether I need to send it back. The Bokeh is dreamy but in the focal range it seems lacking in sharpness. But hey, I'm an ameture!

The photo was taken wide open at f1.4 and I've done nothing to the image other than resize. As far as a difference between stops? I shot from a tripod at every stop up to f22 and could see very little difference in sharpness, only slight variations in exposure.

[jdos2]

It certainly doesn't appear sharp in that picture. Does it have a plane of sharp focus at all? Very pretty background. Sharp or not, it's pretty.

[busterboy]

http://www.zen118613.zen.co.uk/candids/joanne-portrait/sammy-macro.jpg

[malla1962]

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q7112.jpg

[Amichore]

It certainly doesn't appear sharp in that picture. Does it have a plane of sharp focus at all? Very pretty background. Sharp or not, it's pretty.

Good question. I think I am going to try shooting some 2D test patterns. At least then I will know if I am on plane or not. Thanks for the comment. I do like the way the flowers in the backround look.

[kster]

Also posted in another thread:

http://photos.imageevent.com/kster/landscape/carmelhearstcastle/IMG_3847.jpg

[Eagle]

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q7112.jpg

What lens is this with? And any Exif data you have.

[willowdawn]

Ok,

So I've read many threads and more pages of this thread than I should admit to... and I'm still confused! Is this good... or bad, bokeh?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/231/476752517_d9357391bc.jpg

85mm f/5.6

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/244/458831467_866dadd85b.jpg

50mm f/3.2

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/201/455843727_94292a3083.jpg
85mm f/1.8

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/168/447291617_9924e8504d.jpg
50mm f/2.2

And if you would be so kind as to explain why it is good or bad, I would be eternally grateful!

[In2Photos]

Ok,

So I've read many threads and more pages of this thread than I should admit to... and I'm still confused! Is this good... or bad, bokeh?

And if you would be so kind as to explain why it is good or bad, I would be eternally grateful!
I don't really like this guy but his article on Bokeh isn't bad. Worth a read and will answer your questions.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm

[willowdawn]

Mike,
Thanks for the read. After reading, and looking again, I'm going to say that it is pretty good bokeh. I'm not seeing sharp edges, but there is definitely identifable spherical shapes. But then again, I could be sooooo wrong!

[In2Photos]

Mike,
Thanks for the read. After reading, and looking again, I'm going to say that it is pretty good bokeh. I'm not seeing sharp edges, but there is definitely identifable spherical shapes. But then again, I could be sooooo wrong!
It isn't the worst I have ever seen.:) There are a few highlights in each of the first three photos that have some sharp edges. These shots are pretty small and harder to tell. If you look at the original at 100% magnification it might be easier to discern. All in all though they don't seem to take away anything in the image which is a good thing.

The best advice I can give you though is to not get caught up in worrying about your bokeh. If you know the limits of your glass then you can make any picture work for you.

[gsgary]

300F2.8L @ 2.8
http://gsgary.smugmug.com/photos/147937052-M.jpg

[jdos2]

Here's an example of the 50mm f/1.2 up close, when it hits focus (first try this time!) It's got nice color.

[Ozimax]

Might as well give my very first post on this topic. Image taken with Canon 30D and 70-200 F4 (non IS) a few weeks ago on the NSW north coast.

http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l169/ozimax/B23.jpg

[Tareq]

Might as well give my very first post on this topic. Image taken with Canon 30D and 70-200 F4 (non IS) a few weeks ago on the NSW north coast.

http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l169/ozimax/B23.jpg

Welcome to the FORUM:)

And nice shot, keep'em up.

[malla1962]

What lens is this with? And any Exif data you have.Canon 1dmk2,1/800@f2.8 iso100 Canon ef300f2.8Lis.:D

[divinemethod]

i like this ...Do you?

http://divinemethod.zenfolio.com/img/p968276446-4.jpg

[divinemethod]

I don't really like this guy but his article on Bokeh isn't bad. Worth a read and will answer your questions.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm

Just to add to that....

I am no way an expert, but to me, good bokeh is something complimentary to the image. I guess that adds a certain bias to the definition of "good bokeh". IMO, good bokeh shouldn't distract you from the image, but help your eyes ease back on to the subject.

[Jamdiver]

Dandelion

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/222/486905495_4a867c61a2_o.jpg

[Jamdiver]

http://www.chrisblaze.smugmug.com/photos/129776570-L.jpg

Chris, this shot is awesome I hope you've got it framed somewhere :).

[James M]

Eve

http://www.jamesmarshall.net/dd/evie1.jpg

http://www.jamesmarshall.net/dd/evie2.jpg

[DDan]

I'll put one up. 30D w/ 24-105L

http://DDan.smugmug.com/photos/150925577-L.jpg

[No786]

50mm 1.8/f

http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t146/no786/l_ec6a9753f11f2414bc5900f9edf02cce.jpg

http://a694.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/52/l_7e64bba4f65512183aa0be1c6bf267ed.jpg

[RLipp69]

i took this at a recent sox game with my 70-200 IS F2.8:)

[turboturtle]

Canon 20D, 50mm macro lens

[nonenone]

canon 350d 70-200mm| f/2.8 | shot @ 200mm iso 100 f/8 1/500sec exposure compesation -0.7step

[Yanis]

canon 350d 70-200mm| f/2.8 | shot @ 200mm iso 100 f/8 1/500sec exposure compesation -0.7step

:eek: :eek: :eek: SWEET :eek: :eek: :eek:


Peace,
Yanis :D

[GBRandy]

This count? 85mm f1.8....just a grab shot of my daughter heading to school
http://www.ymcagymstars.com/2006_07_events/Sheboygan/Emily4.jpg

[cdhender]

135/2. Love this lens.

[Technophile]

i just got a 35L. man, this lens has some great bokeh. im sure ill be back here once i get used to this lens!

[adned]

EF-100mm F/2.0

[dilorenzo1954]

Posted in another thread...

[philc123]

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/323761136_0c63d340fb.jpg

[captiankirk28]

http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o21/captiankirk28/snake.jpg

[dilorenzo1954]

Pretty nice Kirk! It looks like it's smiling!

[_aravena]

http://a248.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/31/l_171b4c2a3833694d656eeb5ed6b4ffbf.jpg

This could also be a dangerous shot if my lens was "backfocusing".:rolleyes: :lol:

[Lord_Malone]

http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/7264/ord7319editoj9.jpg

[caiguar]

I am no pro or anything like it but here it goes, hope you guys like 'em. I saw a lot of great pics in this thread, there were handheld with a sigma 70-200 2.8 non macro

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a350/caiguar0/XTI/yellow.jpg

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a350/caiguar0/XTI/reds.jpg

[snevs]

Here are my humble attempts. Shot just this morning.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/194/499885705_b397f2b266.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/snevs/499885705/)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/193/499838522_f919c8b6bd.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/snevs/499838522/)

[Psychic1]

http://i.pbase.com/o6/37/705637/1/74367583.gT2ccaN7.IMG_8261BW.jpg

10D and 35-350 @ 350mm from 50 feet.

[markbluemica]

A quick one while walking my dog taken with 5d and 70-200 2.8 @ 2.8
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v23/markbluemica/portraits/IMG_3106.jpg

[orisky]

85 1.8

http://orisky.smugmug.com/photos/141904210-L.jpg