Bokeh -post your best pls

[peacock]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/valentine1/Nature/IMG_2608s.jpg

[Jetmech1]

Very nice pic peacock........

[peacock]

Very nice pic peacock........

thanks:D

[nicolerork]

http://www.nicolerork.com/photos/2006.04/tiger.jpg

Sigma 70-300

[jedwards]

I took this testing out the 250D with the 50...

http://jedwards.smugmug.com/photos/65329763-L.jpg

[B-Brother]

My Fav.

http://static.flickr.com/48/133067318_9626301b37_o.jpg

[T.D.]

Found this apple tree on a walk yesterday.

[Lord_Malone]

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/4667/t2l8932a5ru.jpg

[Papaw]

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i46/jdewell/IMG_0395.jpg

Some scrap Cooper.

[JennB]

73714

[Lord_Malone]

73714

Red x, Jenn. :(

[JennB]

Red x, Jenn. :(

I don't know what happened!:( A glitch maybe...I can see the picture now.:)

[kwsanders]

What do you guys/gals think about this one? I took it a week or so ago, but I haven't had a chance to get on the forums much as of late.

[chemicalbro]

how about this one :)
Taken with a Sigma 105
http://hellmouth.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Spider9.jpg

[Calzinger]

What lens was that taken with Kerry?

Here's my latest contribution taken with the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8. I'll give you a cookie if you can figure out what car this is a picture of. It was featured at this year's New York International Auto Show.
http://photo.calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/ny_autoshow_2006/864.576._MG_5418.jpg

[verty]

here are some pics taken with my 350d, standard kit lens..
adjustments in PS.. hope you like...
you can see more of my pics at http://www.verty.deviantart.com :p

[Ronald S. Jr.]

Those look fine, verty, but neither exhibits bokeh. ;-)

[In2Photos]

Those look fine, verty, but neither exhibits bokeh. ;-)

My thoughts exactly.

[verty]

ops sorry... i thought i was posting in another thread...
i saw this thread and wanted to post some pics with a nice shallow DOF...
but wanted to post the ones in this thread in another.. OPPPPPS

hope it doesnt mess up the thread.. see you can tell im a newbie here

[dissembled]

http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/875/sat003copy3le.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[verty]

ok here are some bokeh pics from me... :p

[kwsanders]

What lens was that taken with Kerry?

I took that shot using the 50mm f/1.4 on my XT. It was shot at f/1.4, 1/2000 sec, ISO 100.

[thx-1138uk]

A quickie of a tulip in my garden taken with my 75-200.

[Calzinger]

50 f/1.8 II
http://photo.calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/dog/864.576._MG_5072.jpg

It's not really "nice" bokeh since this lens doesn't really do that, but maybe it can provide a good contrast between "good" and "bad" bokeh.

[whiskaz]

http://www.thejonzes.net/gallery2/d/2878-2/IMG_2691.jpg

[Davidsl222]

http://static.flickr.com/15/92849443_3a98ad2505.jpg

[verty]

50 f/1.8 II


It's not really "nice" bokeh since this lens doesn't really do that, but maybe it can provide a good contrast between "good" and "bad" bokeh.

owww very cute

[Nicky D]

Here are a few shots I have taken

http://www.pbase.com/nickyd/image/58540949

http://www.pbase.com/nickyd/image/58540965


http://www.pbase.com/nickyd/image/58541041

[chemicalbro]

http://www.thejonzes.net/gallery2/d/2878-2/IMG_2691.jpg

LOL this shot is priceless :)

[chemicalbro]

Davidsl222....... did you sharpen that with a diamond ;)....nice image but somehow it looks false (like you selectively blurred the background in photoshop, or pasted the bottom right flower in there)

[rklepper]

God I love this thread. Hope it never stops as I really enjoy looking through it. Here is one take last winter. Might not be the best, but I like it.

[Davidsl222]

Davidsl222....... did you sharpen that with a diamond ;)....nice image but somehow it looks false (like you selectively blurred the background in photoshop, or pasted the bottom right flower in there)

I used smart sharpen on the entire photo at .2 pixels at 100% but did not do any special masking. This one also the same thing.

http://static.flickr.com/18/92848583_cf69df6090.jpg

[epolevne]

70-200/2.8 IS @ 200mm/3.2
http://clarks.smugmug.com/photos/62266695-M.jpg

[cosworth]

Another 70-200 F4 great example:

http://www.jasonhollister.com/images/blondie.jpg

[Carzee]

Usual sort of result ---yesterday's game with 135L at f2.5

http://www.mygraphix.com/index/u/9/33/137.jpg

[interman]

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/9673/55kq.jpg

Taken with my 100mm macro prime

[exSnowdrop]

Love all these shots. Its also good when the bokeh is part of the "story"
Prom prep....

[Calzinger]

http://photo.calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/plants/960.640._MG_5783.jpg

http://photo.calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/plants/960.640._MG_5831.jpg

[shanni]

Ok, I just learned what bokeh means...I hope this is right.

http://static.flickr.com/49/136060593_c31d012078.jpg

Not bad for an A620!

[Nikolas]

BMW Sauber formula 1 car (used to be williams last year)
But a scale model of the real thing.
Looks too "metallic" to be the real thing.
Either way it's a great shot.


What lens was that taken with Kerry?

Here's my latest contribution taken with the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8. I'll give you a cookie if you can figure out what car this is a picture of. It was featured at this year's New York International Auto Show.
http://photo.calzinger.net/_sitecontent/_cache/_photos/ny_autoshow_2006/864.576._MG_5418.jpg

[Mycroft]

Took with 100-400 L.

I'm going to guess he's holding a 5D (with battery grip of course) and a Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 :D :cool:

[Calzinger]

BMW Sauber formula 1 car (used to be williams last year)
But a scale model of the real thing.
Looks too "metallic" to be the real thing.
Either way it's a great shot.
A good guess, but unfortunately, this car is not the F1 car. After comparing the noses of the BMW Sauber and this car (Formula BMW), the Formula BMW's nose is a bit thinner and widens as it comes closer to the cockpit. The Sauber's nose is a bit wider from the front wing mounting pylons back to the cockpit. The paint schemes on the noses are exactly the same.

Another difference is that the emblem on the Formula BMW is actually mounted onto the car. No F1 team would do such a thing to the car due to the added aerodynamic penalty, especially when it's something as insignificant as a manufacturer emblem.

Hey, I wish they had the Sauber at the auto show, but as you could guess, F1 is an unpopular as it gets here in the states.

[Rokkorfan]

Just the usual from every weekend :)

[Rokkorfan]

http://www.nicolerork.com/photos/2006.04/tiger.jpg


Sigma 70-300

Got to say, this bokeh looks terrible. Note the double images in the background of the blades of grass and the strange effect above the nose. This is acttually a classic example of bad bokeh.

Cheers,

Antony

[Tom_D]

Here is a link to a good technical article on bokeh. (http://www.darkroom.com/MiscDocs/bokeh.pdf)

I tend to get a bit more subjective and say if the OOF part of the photograph detracts from the overall quality of the picture it is bad bokeh.

When a photograph hurts my eyes tying to focus the background or foreground that is about as bad as it gets for me.

I have really enjoyed this series and have posted here myself. I'd like to see it continue with more discussion on what bokeh is and why we think a picture we post is a good example.

[Rokkorfan]

Here is a link to a good technical article on bokeh. (http://www.darkroom.com/MiscDocs/bokeh.pdf)

I'd like to see it continue with more discussion on what bokeh is and why we think a picture we post is a good example.

I fully agree. After a cruise through most of the images in the thread I would say that there is a lack of understanding as to what good and bad bokeh really is. For example, Virtually any shot taken at macro distances will have a nice out of focus background due to the tiny depth of field of the shot. All of the photos in here that are may be great macro shots, but they don't necessarily mean the lens has good bokeh.

In other posts it appears as though people assume that subject separation from the background means good bokeh. As we can see with the tiger shot above, this is not necessarily the case.

Good and bad is hard to define, and additionally can be a very personal judgement. That said, what many define as good, neutral and poor bokeh is shown in the image attached. On the left is an example of bad bokeh. You will note that it has a sharply defined outer rim, and is darker towards the centre. In the middle is an example of a highlight from a lens that we would say has neutral bokeh. It is an evenly illuminated circle, with a well defined outer edge. Finally, on the right is an example of an out of focus highlight from a lens with good bokeh. It has an undefined edge, and is not distracting.

The different types of bokeh are caused by spherical aberration. I won't try to explain it in detail, but basically, if a lens has good bokeh for backgrounds, it will have bad bokeh for foregrounds, and vice versa. This is due to under or over corrected spherical aberration. Given that "good" bokeh is actually caused by imperfection in the design, most lenses are actually designed to achieve neutral bokeh. The shot of the BMW is a pretty good example of this.

A second factor where bad bokeh can rear its ugly head is with aperture blades. All of us will have shots where pinpoints of light display as little pentagons or whatever. This occurs when a lens is closed down somewhat from maximum aperture, and the pattern of the aperture blades is reflected in the out of focus highlights. Nowadays many modern professional lenses are constructed with rounded aperture blades so as to give nice round highlights even when stopped down somewhat from maximum aperture.

Bokeh is such a big deal in Japan that lenses like the Minolta 85mm STF (smooth trans-focus) are designed with technical innovations specifically to achieve pleasing bokeh. Others are deliberately created with undercorrected spherical aberration in order to obtain the incredible smooth creamy backgrounds that they are famous for (at the price of poor bokeh in front of the plane of focus).

Cheers,

Antony

[Rokkorfan]

Then of course there is the 85mm L. It was undoubtedly designed with some sort of divine assistance. :)

[whiskaz]

Rokkorfan, nice shot! That's crazy looking... the people look like they could jump out of the picture... very nice. Stupid 85mm *L* :)

[Ty H]

;)
This was with my friend's 20D and 50mm f/1.4 BTW.

[tmunson]

My Pooch...

http://images1.snapfish.com/346%3A375%3C5%7Ffp33%3B%3Enu%3D3256%3E984%3E372%3E WSNRCG%3D3233685589728nu0mrj

[twisted pixels]

New here.
All comments welcome.

[Carzee]

Welcome Twisted... good Kookie shot there. He wants your vegemite sandwich.

...and you made this thread break 1100 posts. 76,600 views!
Thread began in August last year... have you looked at all 23 pages?
I doubt anyone has the time, you'd need all afternoon.

[martinattullymet]

Finn

[troutbreath]

http://www.michaelrparker.com/images/sjp_in_my_sights_small.jpg

[scraggles]

Here's something I took this weekend. 70-200 f/2.8

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c199/syntheticocean/_MG_7438.jpg

[Eagle]

Kit 18-55 Bokeh

[Lotto]

70-200L IS

[steved110]

70-200 f/4

[shanni]

http://static.flickr.com/51/141823041_75702012a5.jpg

[kwsanders]

Very nice capture, Shanni. I really like the color contrasts.

[Carzee]

This one is pushing it? -large bokeh: 70-200mm f2.8L 1995. ASA400, 1/160th, f2.8

http://www.mygraphix.com/index/u/9/36/149.jpg

[cjm]

Here is one of a Hissing Canada Goose.

[pparker]

I kind of like the Bokeh from my 600 mm.

[Dockworker]

from atop the "Quill" an extinct volcano on St.Eustatius. Taken with canon 17-85

[BottomBracket]

Here is one of a Hissing Canada Goose.

Uhhh, where's the bokeh here?

[cjm]

Uhhh, where's the bokeh here?Seeing that the waves from the water blurred to make a neat blue, thats where it is ;)

[Ocean Blue]

I have several that I like, but this is from my film days. My favorite blur is usually similar to that produced by the human eye when you focus on something close up with your eyes and the background is out-of-focus; a "natural" look. For my taste, too much and it can become special effect like or just distracting.

[englishw]

75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens
210mm
f/7.1 1/500s

[kwsanders]

Nice capture, Bill. I took this one this past Sunday afternoon.

http://static.flickr.com/43/147304962_d94accab7e.jpg

[superdiver]

Here is my shot at good Bokeh.....

http://superdiver.smugmug.com/photos/66408923-L.jpg

[enquiry@tcbrake.com]

Canon 85mm f1.2 L MK II 1/90 sec - f1.2 Canon 5d - Tripod and cable release - Manual focus

[Jarrad]

100mm Macro @ 2.8

http://xs100.xs.to/xs100/06195/_MG_2078-2.jpg

:)

[René Damkot]

Nice!

[Sikario]

20D and Contax Planar 50mm f/1.7 T*
http://i.pbase.com/o4/28/569228/1/59586797.ConkerBudSmall.jpg

20D and Pentacon 135mm f/2.8
http://i.pbase.com/o4/28/569228/1/60480654.PentaconPost.jpg

[fivegallon]

more from the shipyard...

Bokeh
http://igics-orea.fotopic.net/p29453760.html

Full Subject
http://igics-orea.fotopic.net/p29453762.html

[kwsanders]

Nice shots, Sikario. I really like the second photo.

[glowie]

50 1.4 + kenko tubes
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v104/stoner_on_a_bicycle/macro/m1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v104/stoner_on_a_bicycle/macro/m2.jpg

[weka2000]

Taken today Sigma 50-500 F16 1/125

[abigailandsam]

http://i.pbase.com/o4/14/603214/1/59374672.IMG_7547sm.jpg

Canon EOS 20D ,Canon EF 500mm f/4L USM
1/800s f/8.0 at 700.0mm (500mm + 1.4x) iso400

[glowie]

very nice abigailandsam.....great shot!

[Lotto]

http://home.pacbell.net/coolbit/IMG_8177.jpg

20D, 70-200L IS @ 153mm, f2.8

[Jarrad]

http://xs201.xs.to/xs201/06212/_MG_2504-2.jpg

[Ty H]

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j288/98stang/park1edit.jpg

[kwsanders]

Absolutely beautiful, abigailandsam. That is a Mockingbird, right? The focus is spot on! Very nice bokeh. This is definitely one of my favorites from the entire thread.

[Blackie]

135L

[EOS_JD]

http://www.eospix.com/albums/JassaSub05/Blue_Heron.jpg

70-200 f2.8L IS

[Tareq]

100mm f2.8 Macro

[Tareq]

Edited

[EOS_JD]

70-200 f2.8L IS

Is that bokeh? or Sky :-)

[Snowman100]

Bird eating...

[Tareq]

Is that bokeh? or Sky :-)

you do some crops then it will be a bokeh;)
sorry for that

[MattyB]

proud of this one

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v201/chevs_n_holdens/partdesat.jpg

[Jarrad]

proud of this one

I would be too.
Great shot.

[Carzee]

Love that one Matt.



..and keep 'em coming!

[twotimer]

http://mypixel.ca/photo/buddy1.jpg

f3.5 1/250 165mm using the 70 200mm f2.8 lens

[johnathan]

http://johnathan.smugmug.com/photos/71238835-L.jpg

All of these are beautiful ! Here is my humble example. I love the color of this one. Taken with my beloved 70-200/4L
Johnathan

[Lord_Malone]

70-200 f2.8L IS

Um... Incredible blue background blur?

[rgravel]

proud of this one

What a cute little guy :)

Great shot ;)

[kwsanders]

Great shot, Matt. It is definitely a keeper.

I really like the ones from twotimer and Johnathan as well. There are some very good shots in this very long thread.

[johnathan]

kwsanders
Thank you for the compliment. I had never even heard of Bokeh when this shot was taken last month. I wanted to try out the camera wide open ! Efix 200mm F4 and shooting AE the shutter was at 1/1000 ISO 200

[kwsanders]

I just noticed that you shot this with the 70-200mm f/4L. Don't you just love it? It stays on my camera most of the time these days. I do not think I have posted these two in this thread yet. I took both on the day that I got my f/4L.

FL=200mm, f/4, 1/160 sec, ISO 200, from tripod
http://potn.kwsanders.com/IMG_1320.jpg


FL=200mm, f/5, 1/100 sec, ISO 100, hand held
http://potn.kwsanders.com/IMG_2690.jpg

[GNMink]

OT, Kerry how's everything in B'ham ?

[PAFC2004]

Not the BEST shot I have.

http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j269/PAFC2004/bokeh1.jpg

[johnathan]

Kerry
Yes I do love the lens. But I really do long for more reach ! I mostly shoot at 200mm with birds ect. But can see I am not fond of a fixed focal length ie my 50mm! I really like the zoom. John

[Lotto]

50 mm 1.4 @ f2.2

http://home.pacbell.net/coolbit/michipool.jpg

[Carzee]

Um... Incredible blue background blur?

!
Buttery blue there!

:)

[Tareq]

!
Buttery blue there!

:)

I will change blue color with red then, is that ok?

[kwsanders]

Very nice photo, PAFC2004. I like that.

Yes I do love the lens. But I really do long for more reach ! I mostly shoot at 200mm with birds ect. But can see I am not fond of a fixed focal length ie my 50mm! I really like the zoom. John

I wish that I had something longer as well. I had thought about the 100-400mm, but I do not have the money for it right now. The length would make it easier getting photos of those birds that are hard to sneak up on. :)

It appears that my photos did not come through above. Is anyone else seeing them?

[Ronald S. Jr.]

Not seeing a thing, Kerry.

[johnathan]

At F4 this lens is great for bokeh and tack sharp . Johnatan
70-200/F4L

http://johnathan.smugmug.com/photos/71343117-L.jpg

[jbrown1]

Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG shot at 1/800 f/6.3 iso 200 handheld at 70mm

http://BoogalooPhoto.smugmug.com/photos/71699350-L.jpg

[rklepper]

Is that bokeh? or Sky :-)

At f/13 most likely just sky.

[Tareq]

got a mistake to insert a pic of F13 instead of F2.8
will edit later, i am lazy now.

[glowie]

http://johnathan.smugmug.com/photos/71343117-L.jpg

I look like this every morning

[EOS_JD]

At f/13 most likely just sky.

Hi Doc.... I was kind of being smart. I knew it was sky and was just kidding :-)

[johnathan]

Glowie
At least I combed my hair for this shot ha ha. Guess I should have been using sunscreen the last 47 years ! Johnathan

I did want to add all of the shots posted here and on my smug are hand held unless stated otherwise.

[kwsanders]

Not seeing a thing, Kerry.

Turns out my hosting site was down earlier today (Friday). It is back up now and the photos should be coming through. :confused:

[kwsanders]

At F4 this lens is great for bokeh and tack sharp . Johnatan
70-200/F4L

http://johnathan.smugmug.com/photos/71343117-L.jpg

Nice shot. The focus is definitely tack sharp. I was driving home with my son today and we saw two Guineas, but before I could get the 50mm prime off and the 70-200mm f/4L on the camera, they flew off. :(

[robekert]

Like 78 pages does not seem enough for this thread.....I guess I will throw my hat into the ring.

300 2.8 Non IS+1DMkII
http://homepage.mac.com/robekert/.Pictures/Photo%20Album%20Pictures/2005-06-18%2008.46.38%20-0700/Image-1E417B00E00F11D9.jpg

Rob

[Novaheart]

Having only just heard of the term bokeh a few weeks ago and being a newbie to photography and this forum, I don't know if this is good or bad bokeh. Anyway, here is my contribution to this thread. Taken with Powershot A620.

[G-DSLR]

http://www.bramblesthehorse.com/g-media/ocaucc/flower003.jpg
with my new 50mm 1.8 lens

[cosworth]

Another odd exmaple:

http://www.jasonhollister.com/images/Processed/chromeBW.jpg

[johnathan]

G-DSLR
Very nice I loce the color.
cosworth
Don't know what it is but the B&W looks great with chrome !
Robekert
Love the colors and the bokeh just fades nicley.
Novaheart you have the concept !
Johnathan

[Novaheart]

Novaheart you have the concept !
Johnathan
Thanks, but you didn't comment on if it's good or bad bokeh ;)

[Novaheart]

Maybe these are better bokeh?

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/novaheart/IMG_0494.jpg
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/novaheart/IMG_1570.jpg

[350D_Noob]

I don't know if I'm playing right, but here you go anyways.

http://members.cox.net/jgabriel/IMG_3324.jpg

[K_AMJ]

My experiences:


http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/image/58334841 (http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/image/58334841)
http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/image/59415082
http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/image/60364611

[markyb]

here is one i did in tenerife last week

[Eagle]

Markyb that eagle is beautiful, one of the best I've seen in a long time. Can you post your exif data? Which lens? Was it captive?

[johnathan]

Markyb
That is beautiful ! Your focus point is perfect and very sharp !

Novaheart
I do like those better more of a classical bokeh style. But your first is still bokeh but the subject seems to be in the bokeh/back ground and the back ground in focus/forground. I like it .

If anyone wants to see more of my pictures I have a new account on smugmug. Johnathan
Johnathan

[ChopstickHero]

http://images17.fotki.com/v311/photos/7/73230/3582152/IMG_1387-vi.jpg

[dgoad]

I'll try...

[blur07]

Got my new Canon 50/1.4 today, the bokeh is outstanding!

http://web.comhem.se/~u73905159/duckshot.jpg

[Ronald S. Jr.]

Sigma 20mm f/1.8. I'm getting to enjoy this lens since I've been waiting for my 35L. Pretty freakin' sharp most of the time.

82643

[Jetmech1]

The Canon 50mm 1.4 is an outstanding lens. It and the 85mm 1.8 lens stay on my camera most of the time.


Got my new Canon 50/1.4 today, the bokeh is outstanding!

http://web.comhem.se/~u73905159/duckshot.jpg

[nathanx]

Not my best one but i like the bokeh in this shot.
SMC Takumar 50nn 1,4 on Eos 350D.


http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/6332/remote23ky.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[nancypics]

Not sure if this worked (my first time uploading a pic!). His eyelashes aren't as clear as I'd wanted, but what the heck, it's a bokeh shot... (f2.8 100mm macro)

82903

[nancypics]

EOS_JD - I love the way your bird shot is lit - it's stunning....

[nancypics]

'Nuther one... (I'm addicted to bokeh... so many shots to choose from!! can I upload my entire hard drive? lol) f2.8 100mm macro

82910

[CajunGal]

I'm a Rebel newbie so I don't have many good pics to choose from, but this would be my best brokeh... so far. ;)
18-55mm kit lens, full auto, hand held.

http://images16.fotki.com/v301/photos/5/53191/3606828/dandelion01-vi.jpg

[CajunGal]

Having only just heard of the term bokeh a few weeks ago and being a newbie to photography and this forum, I don't know if this is good or bad bokeh. Anyway, here is my contribution to this thread. Taken with Powershot A620.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=82084&stc=1&d=1148747266 I'm a newbie too & am just learning about bokeh. I think your photo is great, but according to this article, "What is Bokeh" (http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm) it wouldn't be considered "good" bokeh, since the bg edges are still fairly sharp. :)

[Novaheart]

Hi Cajungal,
Thanks for the link to the "What Is Bokeh" article. At this point I'm just happy when a shot works out like that one did :)

[K_AMJ]

With 17-85:

http://k41.pbase.com/g3/59/643459/3/56642276.CopyofIMG_4515.jpg (http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/insects)

Two more:
http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/image/56642307
http://www.pbase.com/k_amj/image/56642050

[grego]

From the 20th Annual Jazz Festival, held at UCLA. Kenny Burrell(who also is one of my professors :) )

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/9562/img3919kennypaper4lb.jpg

[fivegallon]

From the 20th Annual Jazz Festival, held at UCLA. Kenny Burrell(who also is one of my professors :) )

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/9562/img3919kennypaper4lb.jpg


grego..... Awesome!!! care to share the exif data?

[Ronald S. Jr.]

A very tight crop (90-some %) of a shot I took today with my 70-200L IS. Nice and creamy. Can't wait for the actual flowers to come out, though!

84288

[Tifosi2k2]

Newbie here so I'm not real sure if this is considered "Bokeh". Pics taken with RebelXT and Canon 50mm 1.8.

http://images5.theimagehosting.com/astonJacket1resize.jpg (http://www.theimagehosting.com)

and

http://images5.theimagehosting.com/dyson1resize.75d.jpg (http://www.theimagehosting.com)
:)

[Reyno]

Here's my contribution.

[basroil]

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/8062/bokeh19sv.jpg

this one helpful?

[glowie]

84342