PDA

View Full Version : Macro lens used in these shots?


elibell
9th of December 2010 (Thu), 21:08
http://i51.tinypic.com/24l1uts.jpg
http://i55.tinypic.com/145nxu.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/tajabk.jpg

What type of lens/setup you guys think is being used to get such clarity?

Andy R
9th of December 2010 (Thu), 23:25
doesnt look like a macro lens to me...butwho knows...

ni$mo350
9th of December 2010 (Thu), 23:30
why does it matter? It has more to do with the lighting and camera settings than anything else.

gjl711
9th of December 2010 (Thu), 23:44
None of these are macro shots. I would think that pretty much any lens could do this type of shot including the kit lens. As mentioned, it's all in the lighting and maybe post processing.

gjl711
9th of December 2010 (Thu), 23:46
Ok, I looked a lot closer, is this doll clothing?

If so then maybe only the last one would need a macro. If the doll is Barbie size, I stand by my original statement. At to what macro would work, any of them I would think. It's still about the lighting.

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 01:12
This is a life size mannequin - So most probably the clarity/colors was enriched with Lightroom?

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 14:09
Here's a picture of an image we just took http://i56.tinypic.com/a1mys6.jpg

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 16:06
I'm confused elibell. What's the point of this thread? Are you trying to make us guess your setup to say that it's good and you like it or are you asking if a macro lens can be used to take shots of clothing/models?

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 16:48
I'm confused elibell. What's the point of this thread? Are you trying to make us guess your setup to say that it's good and you like it or are you asking if a macro lens can be used to take shots of clothing/models?

I'm trying to get my images to look like the first 3 I posted and wanted to get some input as to what might I do to help achieve it.

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 17:13
Ah, see that makes more sense. Sorry the original post was very vague. I can't see your EXIF on the image you posted but it comes down to lighting and your settings and properly exposing it. You could essentially get that shot with a # of different body/lens setups that aren't macro so it really doesn't matter if it's a macro lens or not. What are you using in your shot?

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 18:16
I apologize for not being clear

I've attached a pic of the EXIF and how our setup is - Please let me know if you have other questions :)

The equipment being used is:
Canon EO S Rebel XTi 400D
EFS 50-255mm lens

Elinchrom D-Lite 2 (Flash) Umbrella

http://i51.tinypic.com/jskfgw.jpghttp://i54.tinypic.com/2mwfczt.jpg

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 18:22
First thing that pops to mind is your aperture. There shouldn't be a reason to shoot at such high settings as eventually it starts to hurt you rather than help you. Start at f/8 and work from there and post your results. I've never shot above f/14 because there simply isn't a reason to. You have total control since it is a studio setting. If you need to, move the lights back. Are you using a tripod?

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 19:36
Here we go and below you'll find what I got as a result of some adjustments in lightroom ( left mannequin is what I'm going for and the right is my photo)
http://i52.tinypic.com/2m61ggi.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/29wlovs.jpg

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 19:44
Drop it to ISO100 it won't make a huge difference but shooting at 200 isn't necessary. If the pic to the left of the EXIF is straight out of camera then you're overexposing. Turn your lights down. I'm not sure how adjustable the d-lite's are but they're blowing out your image.

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 19:49
How's the sharpness & clarity coming out to you between the 2 pics? I will get another shot @ISO100 and turn down the lights a bit and post :)

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 19:58
Are you shooting in RAW and are you using a light meter? Sharpness and clarity are ok but will only get better once the shot is properly exposed. Fixing exposure to compensate in post only diminishes the details. Shoot RAW, expose it properly for F8 up and down the subject. Are you shooting on a tripod?

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 20:00
I should also add that the crops will never match because it's likely that the first shots might have been shot with something that has higher MP so comparing crop to crop won't get you anything but more frustrated. I can crop all day long on my 5dii but when I had my T1i I made sure to fill the frame so I didn't lose anything.

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 20:21
Yes, shooting in RAW on a tripod. Do not have a light meter. Here are the new shots I just worked on

http://i52.tinypic.com/2hd156o.jpghttp://i55.tinypic.com/2qurxae.jpg

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 20:24
2nd one is MUCH better. Are you turning IS off while on the tripod?

elibell
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 20:35
Not sure if it's on or not and how to switch it

ni$mo350
10th of December 2010 (Fri), 20:55
It's on the side of the lens by the AF-MF switch. Turn IS off because it's trying to detect movement and can cause the image to come out blurry on a tripod. I think you're there with that last one though. Just make sure IS is off and you're good to go. Again you can't match crop for crop but this is a lot better than your other attempts and should give you an idea of what settings to use for your future shots.