View Single Post
Old 30th of May 2009 (Sat)   #33
PIXmantra
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 819
Thumbs down Rob Galbraith's review no longer any actionable purpose...

...Notice that there is not a SINGE (one) figure/#/%/quantitative results.

Nothing, nada, ziipo. I could not find a hit-ratio/numerical results of any kind, anything specific that we incorporate into our everyday lives or make my camera work worse.


I am now having SERIOUS doubts about ANY real application or use of this AF-safa from R.G.

There are several tests, at either HIGH or LOW speed, already avaiable in the web, that pretty much contract some of the specific results that he is "verbalizing" on this very last report. I am like...

Even my own tests, with a camera showing on the original Serial# list of "possibly affected" with absolutely NO service of any kind, whatsoever, except later firmware, performed fantastically well on tests that very closely replicate his issues. Look at this 24 frame sequences, were only ONE (1) is OOF (that is a net 95.83% of effectiveness:

http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/112800977/original
http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/112800978/original
http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/112800979/original

Enjoy!

PIX
__________________
Click here for FlexNR-Professional Noise Reduction for EOS 1D3
2x1DMKIII/40D/450D/Fuji F30
50 f/1.4/17-40 f/4 L/24-105 f/4 L IS/70-200 f/4 L IS/1x220EX/2x580EX/580EX II/2xST-E2/2xCP-E3
EIZO CG241W/Viewsonic VP930b, VP191b
PIXmantra is online now   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member