LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Fake Moon shot?

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk
Thread started 15 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 20:11   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
xclusix
Member
Joined Feb 2010
36 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hey guys, i was just wondering, this guy i know claims to have taken this image last night (March 14th):

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img268.imagesha​ck.us/img268/5880/fake​moon.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Uploaded with ImageShack.usexternal link

But, this image i think shows the current wrong phase for Mexico am i right?

He also claims that it was shot with a 70-200 + 2x converter wide open...is that level of detail possible on a 50D?

Thanks!

Post #1, Mar 15, 2011 20:11:22




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
nebula_42
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2005
183 posts
San Diego
[MORE/SHARE]

Moon phases are the same all over the world on the same night. With a 200mm and 2X on a crop body, he's at 640mm. Not a real lot of magnification for the moon. The moon's image on the sensor plane would be about 6mm diameter, but he could have cropped it a lot. I would guess it's been sharpened quite a bit. Looks entirely doable to me. Nice shot.

Post #2, Mar 15, 2011 23:33:44


San Diego, CA

all the usual stuff :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
xclusix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Feb 2010
36 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

He gave me his permission to post it here, this had to be done on tripod and about F/8.0 right? lowest ISO possible...? thanks...

Post #3, Mar 16, 2011 01:59:16




LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
568 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

xclusix wrote in post #12027839external link
Hey guys, i was just wondering, this guy i know claims to have taken this image last night (March 14th):

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img268.imagesha​ck.us/img268/5880/fake​moon.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Uploaded with ImageShack.usexternal link

But, this image i think shows the current wrong phase for Mexico am i right?

He also claims that it was shot with a 70-200 + 2x converter wide open...is that level of detail possible on a 50D?

Thanks!

Very sharp for a zoom + TC on a APS-C body, even allowing for PP.

If in any doubt, just start up Stellarium and plug in your mexican friend's location. Have a look at the moon for the date and time in question. See what he would have seen. Simple :)

Post #4, Mar 16, 2011 02:19:45




LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
hollis_f's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
10,418 posts
Sussex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

xclusix wrote in post #12029403external link
He gave me his permission to post it here, this had to be done on tripod and about F/8.0 right? lowest ISO possible...? thanks...

It's spot on for the correct phase, and I can't see anything that would suggest it's not genuine.

Get him to post the image with the exif data intact. That will show camera model, lens, date, exposure settings.


The only problem is that it's upside-down:D

IMAGE: http://www.frankhollis.com/temp/Moon-1.jpg

Post #5, Mar 16, 2011 07:39:16


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
hagz
Junior Member
Joined Feb 2011
29 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

here is one i took a couple of nights ago with a 70-300 no extension tube or anything else on my eos 60d

IMAGE: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p278/richard_haggath/slr%20photographs/moon.png

Post #6, Mar 16, 2011 14:22:09


Canon EOS 60d, Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, Whats next??? a nice prime with a wide aperture.

LOG IN TO REPLY
hagz
Junior Member
Joined Feb 2011
29 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

not quite as sharp but it was my first attempt and it is blown up a little

Post #7, Mar 16, 2011 14:23:31


Canon EOS 60d, Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, Whats next??? a nice prime with a wide aperture.

LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
568 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Taken tonight using Canon 10D mounted prime focus on 130mm reflector, stacked 17 images and sharpened unmercifully.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

Post #8, Mar 16, 2011 17:00:44 as a reply to hagz's post 2 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
xclusix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Feb 2010
36 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Well i guess ill never know, the 60D+70-300 shot is impressive as well...this guy wont provide RAW image, PP method and the jpeg given has no EXIF...so... ill have to belive him. Thanks you all!

PS. i tried it on my 7D with a 300F4 and i just cant get that much detail without stacking...i dont know how to do that BTW...

Post #9, Mar 16, 2011 19:22:57




LOG IN TO REPLY
hagz
Junior Member
Joined Feb 2011
29 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

if you ask me the 50d is shot is extremely sharp i did a bit of an experiment and sharpened my image in it's max resolution and then cropped it it does look sharper but not that sharp lol.

IMAGE: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p278/richard_haggath/slr%20photographs/moon-1.jpg

Post #10, Mar 17, 2011 02:43:17


Canon EOS 60d, Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, Whats next??? a nice prime with a wide aperture.

LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
568 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I think the "seeing" has a lot to do with how sharp an image results. No doubt in Mexico the seeing is a lot better than the south of UK :)

Post #11, Mar 17, 2011 03:01:00 as a reply to hagz's post 17 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
xclusix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Feb 2010
36 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

No no i did some tests and with a 300 and 1.4x at f8 on tripod ISO 100 and lots of PP my image is not that sharp... I cant just belive him... Any good PP method you know? What i do is no NR raw from DPP then little sharpening, into PS. In PS CS5 i do levels layer select aplly, crop and then USM for overall contrast. Then on a new layer high pass filter and mask over where i want it sharper with hard light blending mode... Is that any good?

Post #12, Mar 17, 2011 20:05:09




LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
568 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Well, the answer is, if you can't quite believe the first shot is real, ask for another :) If your friend can produce on demand, they must be kosha.

Post #13, Mar 18, 2011 01:53:59




LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
do I really have to respond?
tonylong's Avatar
Joined Sep 2007
53,001 posts
Vancouver, WA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

What exactly are you questioning? I've seen some pretty good shots using a 70-200 with a 2x TC, and it's true that the moon can take some pretty aggressive sharpening.

Are you questioning thinking the guy used a better lens for this?

Post #14, Mar 18, 2011 02:01:07


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
hagz
Junior Member
Joined Feb 2011
29 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

xclusix wrote in post #12040863external link
No no i did some tests and with a 300 and 1.4x at f8 on tripod ISO 100 and lots of PP my image is not that sharp... I cant just belive him... Any good PP method you know? What i do is no NR raw from DPP then little sharpening, into PS. In PS CS5 i do levels layer select aplly, crop and then USM for overall contrast. Then on a new layer high pass filter and mask over where i want it sharper with hard light blending mode... Is that any good?

wow thats a lot of PP i just took the shot cropped it adjusted the exposure settings then sharpened a little could be why mine i snot so sharp.

Post #15, Mar 18, 2011 10:33:51


Canon EOS 60d, Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD, Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, Whats next??? a nice prime with a wide aperture.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,460 views & 0 likes for this thread
Fake Moon shot?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0025 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
886 guests, 757 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Severed Heads

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.