LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


7D Image quality??

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 23 May 2012 (Wednesday) 23:06   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
StanNJ1
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2006
1,631 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm trying to help a friend of mine evaluate why a lot of his images taken with his new 7D look soft. At first I was convinced it was because of his 18-135 kit lens. But when I mounted my 70-200L 2.8 on his camera and looked closely at the images they too looked softer than when mounted to my 5D or 1DMKIII.

Are there any known image quality issues with the 7D?

Post #1, May 23, 2012 23:06:20


1DX, ID MKIII, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L, 100 macro, 600EX-RTs, ST-E3-RT, Einsteins, Kacey Beauty Dish with a cracked grid, yada yada
www.stansphotos.comexternal link
www.Facebook.com/LikeS​tansPhotosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gjl711
human (barely) and bribable
gjl711's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
48,213 posts
Deep in the heart of Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Are you evaluating per pixel sharpness? Overall sharpness? Have you MFAed the lens?

Posting a sample which shoes the issue would really help. There are lots of reasons why an image is soft and many are user related and some are not.

Post #2, May 23, 2012 23:08:34


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger, then it hit me
.
::Flickr::external link
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
kfreels's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
4,287 posts
Princeton, IN
[MORE/SHARE]

This comes up all the time. The 7D has a rather aggressive anti-aliasing filter as compared to the T2i, 60D, et al. This helps it handle moire a lot better but the down side is a loss in apparent sharpness. The solution is a slight increase in output sharpening.

In-camera jpegs have always seemed a bit on the soft side for my taste so I shoot in RAW almost exclusively. I and several others seem to think that when shooting jpegs, a good deal of data is lost in the jpeg compression process that can't be recovered after the conversion process. So sharpening at this point isn't as effective. The good news is that it can be dealt with easily. It's simply a matter of using the picture style editor and editing your styles with a higher sharpness setting.

As I said, I and a few others think that Canon may have failed to correctly set the default styles up to deal with the stronger AA filter and this often leads people to think there is a softness problem when it is something that is really a settings issue.

Post #3, May 24, 2012 00:16:13 as a reply to gjl711's post 1 hour earlier.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
AJSJones
Goldmember
AJSJones's Avatar
Joined Dec 2001
2,267 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

kfreels wrote in post #14476944external link
This comes up all the time. The 7D has a rather aggressive anti-aliasing filter as compared to the T2i, 60D, et al. .

I found its AA filter about on a par with that of the 5D2, perhaps a tad less moire (100L macro direct comparison) - they both had limiting resolution (perhaps 10% MTF) at ~ 90% of Nyquist. Do you have some comparisons for the 7D and other cameras - I'm always trying to collect data on the AA filters - it's hard to eliminate the other variables to test the AA filter directly.

Post #4, May 24, 2012 00:46:01


My picture galleriesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
wayne.robbins
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2010
2,062 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Mostly, on the 7D, and even on the 5D3, I shoot Raw+JPG. I do this because it's convenient- if the JPG looks good enough SOOC, I leave it, otherwise I have the raw file to play around with. That said, I often bump up the Picture Styles on the 7D - using the Standard setting- but tend to bump up the Sharpness by +2 and sometimes the Contrast by the same. I would guess I am not the only one to do this. I've also heard of people shooting in "Landscape" picture style - because- sharpening is actually +1 over Standard's default settings.

Post #5, May 24, 2012 06:43:41


EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100
Fond memories: Rebel T1i, Canon 18-55 IS, Canon 55-250 IS, 18-135 IS (Given to a good home)...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
Joined May 2002
26,015 posts
Northern Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

StanNJ1 wrote in post #14476738external link
I'm trying to help a friend of mine evaluate why a lot of his images taken with his new 7D look soft. At first I was convinced it was because of his 18-135 kit lens. But when I mounted my 70-200L 2.8 on his camera and looked closely at the images they too looked softer than when mounted to my 5D or 1DMKIII.

Are there any known image quality issues with the 7D?

I have seen more than a couple of L lenses that didn't result in sharp results from a 7D, but did on other bodies. Then again, I have seen EFS lenses that were razor sharp on a 7D as well. Once you have ruled out back or front focusing, and you still have issues, it will most likely be the glass and not the sensor. If you cannot get any image to be sharp regardless of glass, then that could be the sensor.

Post #6, May 24, 2012 06:48:34


Past Equipment | My Galleryexternal link
Resources For Sale: High ISO Denoiser Actionexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
StanNJ1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2006
1,631 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for your responses so far. I will try to post some pics later. He has been shooting RAW. Do the output sharpening adjustments effect RAW images?

Post #7, May 24, 2012 06:48:42


1DX, ID MKIII, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L, 100 macro, 600EX-RTs, ST-E3-RT, Einsteins, Kacey Beauty Dish with a cracked grid, yada yada
www.stansphotos.comexternal link
www.Facebook.com/LikeS​tansPhotosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
Joined May 2002
26,015 posts
Northern Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

StanNJ1 wrote in post #14477625external link
Thanks for your responses so far. I will try to post some pics later. He has been shooting RAW. Do the output sharpening adjustments effect RAW images?

It does if you use DPP, otherwise 3rd party tools will just apply a default group of settings if you allow them to, and you have to take it from there.

Post #8, May 24, 2012 06:49:38


Past Equipment | My Galleryexternal link
Resources For Sale: High ISO Denoiser Actionexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2011
4,291 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

i can make my 7D act like the T2i ,T3i , 60D
in the menu i adjust the Picture Style to User Defined 1
and changed all numbers to

Picture Style User Defined 1(Standard)
Sharpness 7
Contrast 2
Saturation 2
Color tone 1

this image from the camera not edit by any software
7D + EF100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Post #9, May 24, 2012 08:07:13 as a reply to TeamSpeed's post 1 hour earlier.


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
kfreels's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
4,287 posts
Princeton, IN
[MORE/SHARE]

AJSJones wrote in post #14477019external link
I found its AA filter about on a par with that of the 5D2, perhaps a tad less moire (100L macro direct comparison) - they both had limiting resolution (perhaps 10% MTF) at ~ 90% of Nyquist. Do you have some comparisons for the 7D and other cameras - I'm always trying to collect data on the AA filters - it's hard to eliminate the other variables to test the AA filter directly.

If you would have asked me a few months ago I would have had some good information for you. I had some pdfs that I discovered about a year ago on a mad hunt for this info right after I bought my 7D. I had upgraded from a T2i and I noticed it when I would do severe cropping on some subjects. But I found a way around it by adjusting the sharpness. (Also I bought some longer glass to reduce the cropping). Unfortunately I cleaned up my documents folder a few months ago and deleted a bunch of crap that I no longer cared to have and that went with it.

I do recall some of the text though. In particular it was noted that the main issue was with video. So the first batch of cameras with major video capability - namely the 5DII and the 7D - addressed this with that AA filter. The filter in the two was very similar but the tighter pixel density and smaller pixels on the 7D made it stand out more. Owing to a lot of gripes about "7D Sharpness" the AA filter on the T2i and 60D which came out later was less aggressive. So the strongest AA filter was that used in the 7D and 5DII but the loss in sharpness was most pronounced on the 7D.

One other thing it mentioned was the removal of the AA filter if the user doesn't shoot a lot of video. It said that moire can be addressed in post much easier on stills when necessary with a slight gaussian blur and it can of course be applied selectively vs to the whole image. I've considered having this done but can't quite get myself to do it.

Post #10, May 24, 2012 10:30:16


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lore
"Must keep the goat happy"
Lore's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
2,893 posts
Aurora, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't know, I flipflopped between the 5DmkII, 7D, then back to the 5DmkII, going through my flickr, I'm hard pressed to know which is from which unless I actually remember which is from when, the 17-55 & Tokina 50-135 were bangin' sharp on the 7D only common lens I had on both was my sigma 50 & for a short time 24-105L worked great on both.

From what I found, I seem to apply the same amount of sharpening to both RAW files, tho less on the files when I had the 135L, those files needed little to no sharpening PP.

I do know tho when I had the 5D (not mkII), the files were sharper SOOC which clearly is a result of the weaker AA filter.

Edit: I guess if I put them side by side w/ same lens photos I 'can' see the difference & I can see why I ended up with my current camera, course it looks like focus hit the box top. ;)

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7034/6772014495_26ed6a1359_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lorephoto/67720​14495/]external link
Day 27 - Cat Fishingexternal link by lorephotoexternal link, on Flickr
Camera Canon EOS 7D
Aperture f/1.4
Focal Length 50 mm

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5173/5568002373_85c47effe5_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lorephoto/55680​02373/]external link
Horatioexternal link by lorephotoexternal link, on Flickr
Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Aperture f/1.4
Focal Length 50 mm

Post #11, May 24, 2012 10:36:14 as a reply to kfreels's post 5 minutes earlier.


Lore
flickrexternal link - Websiteexternal link - Blographyexternal link
"Every photograph tells a story, What's your story?"

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Stone ­ 13
Goldmember
Stone 13's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
1,688 posts
Huntersville, NC
[MORE/SHARE]

The 7D needs good to great glass to for relatively sharp output and it CAN require more sharpening that other cameras but I wouldn't consider it excessive maybe an extra +10 in LR for my shots compared to my 450D.

Keep in mind the 7D's pixel density will expose flaws in one's hand holding technique. What was acceptable technique with my rebel was revealed to be fairly sloppy with my 7D and cleaning up my technique made a world of difference. If the OP has that covered, then MFA would be the recommended course of action and a trip to Canon service if that doesn't work out.

Posting a few pics would help out quite a bit.

Post #12, May 24, 2012 11:19:02


Ken
5D III gripped | 35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
StanNJ1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2006
1,631 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Here are two shots which aren't identical but close in settings and both were shot with the same exact lens on the same day. It is clear to me that the 1D MKII yielded sharper results

IMAGE: http://www.stansphotos.com/Temporary%20Webpage/7D%20Test%2001.jpg
IMAGE: http://www.stansphotos.com/Temporary%20Webpage/7D%20Test%2002.jpg

Post #13, May 24, 2012 12:17:32


1DX, ID MKIII, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L, 100 macro, 600EX-RTs, ST-E3-RT, Einsteins, Kacey Beauty Dish with a cracked grid, yada yada
www.stansphotos.comexternal link
www.Facebook.com/LikeS​tansPhotosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
JakAHearts's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
6,155 posts
Silver Spring, MD
[MORE/SHARE]

I just looked at two of them. ;)

Post #14, May 24, 2012 13:22:01 as a reply to post 14479241


Shane
http://www.ReighardPho​tography.comexternal link
www.500px.com/JakAHear​ts
www.facebook.com/Reigh​ardPhotography

LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
kfreels's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
4,287 posts
Princeton, IN
[MORE/SHARE]

OK. A 200% crop on an 18MP image is not equivalent to a 200% crop on a 10.1MP image. I'm willing to bet that if the focal length is the same on these two and the head sizes are that close, the subject in the 7D photo was a considerable distance further from the camera.

Post #15, May 24, 2012 13:22:42 as a reply to StanNJ1's post 1 hour earlier.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
19,732 views & 0 likes for this thread
7D Image quality??
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00095 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
846 guests, 783 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is gar612

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.