Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > The POTN Lounge
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7th of August 2006 (Mon)   #1
R Hardman
Senior Member
 
R Hardman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
Posts: 1,512
Default Another Photographer fired for altering images

Saw this on CNN. Can't blame them for firing him. He did a really bad job altering his images. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/...eut/index.html
__________________
"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"

EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)

Rick's Digital Desert
R Hardman is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 7th of August 2006 (Mon)   #2
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
 
Mark0159's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Tron, New Zealand
Posts: 11,349
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

that's really interesting. I have been unable to view the video as I am work. However I don't blame them for the action that they are taking. They are in the business of reporting the news as it is. Not as they wont it to be.

However in saying that I wonder how offen they crop a photo to remove something that they think shouldn't be there, which can in effect change the meaning of an image?
__________________
Mark's gear list

"the fact is that relatively few photographers ever master their medium" - Edward Weston
Mark0159 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of August 2006 (Mon)   #3
Jon Foster
is it safe?
 
Jon Foster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

I just read about it on Fox News too...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,207352,00.html

Jon.
__________________
I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.com & ModelMayhem.com
Jon Foster is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 7th of August 2006 (Mon)   #4
sando
Goldmember
 
sando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Derbyshire, England
Posts: 2,863
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

Quote:
Originally Posted by CNN
Hajj told Reuters he was trying to remove dust marks from the photograph.
Dust that would be visible on that image? I think not.

He souldnt be fired for altering the images if it were true that he was removing dust... he should be shot for blatant dodgy use of clone-stamp!
__________________
- Matt

Chesterfield Wedding Photography | Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook

5DmkII | 17-40 | 24-105 | 580EXII
sando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of August 2006 (Mon)   #5
nation
Member
 
nation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, Oz
Posts: 904
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

Sounds reasonable to me. He's a PJ there to report on the facts not use PS to come up with his own fantasies.
__________________
7D and lenses.
nation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #6
JayKitty
Member
 
JayKitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 369
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

haha he really did do a terrible job at doing that. looks like he clone stamped a few dozen times
__________________
My Stuff:
Canon 20D+BG-E2 / Canon 70-200 2.8L USM / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX DG Macro / Canon 50mm 1.8 / Sekonic L-358 Light Meter

JayKittle.com
JayKitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #7
jpvaz
Member
 
jpvaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 407
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayKitty
... he really did do a terrible job at doing that...
I have to agree with you.... i'm no photoshop expert but i belive even i could have done it better... Well, he got what he deserved!!!

"If you play with fire, you will eventualy get burned!!"
jpvaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #8
Tom W
Canon Fanosapien
 
Tom W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Posts: 12,745
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

This particular photographer has several instances where he has "staged" incidents in relation to the Israel/Lebonon situation, including the use of the same characters in at least 3 incidents in which the same young girl was classified as dead, injured, and being loaded into an ambulance. It was pretty obvious that this particular reporter had a strong bias in this situation.

Lots of this going around in the mainstream media, unfortunately. Seems that they want to "create" the story instead of just reporting it.
__________________
Tom
5D III, 7D, & various lenses
Tom W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #9
Doom1701e
Senior Member
 
Doom1701e's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ©@Ŀϊf¤ŗПιǻ
Posts: 1,241
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

What crappy editing in that CNN pic. What was that guy using, Microsoft Paint?
Doom1701e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #10
Carzee
Cream of the Crop
 
Carzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 6,476
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

Its a safe thing to assume everyone is trying to sell a POV.

Thats my POV anyway.

Did you buy it?
__________________
"Photograph like a hunter... and hunt like a photographer." -RC
Carzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #11
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
 
Mark0159's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Tron, New Zealand
Posts: 11,349
Default Re: Another Photographer fired for altering images

yep, 100% of it. well almost anyway. Everyone has a POV. Strange as it seems there are some out there that do try and bring out information with having a POV. the main problem is they are normaly hidden by those with their own POV. Or the content is edited with someone else POV.

Unless you consider yourself an artist and then your art is your POV.
__________________
Mark's gear list

"the fact is that relatively few photographers ever master their medium" - Edward Weston
Mark0159 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #12
RTMiller
Senior Member
 
RTMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 1,241
Default More photo manipulation by a press photographer

Here is a link to the article...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13165165/

This guy has some pretty poor cloning skills. Totally unneccessary on his part.
Now it would have been a much better picture if he cloned in a couple of Israeli jets.
__________________

Todd

www.PHOTODDGRAPHY.com
Equipment List

Everyone is beautiful if you squint.
RTMiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #13
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
 
Longwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
Posts: 3,903
Default Re: More photo manipulation by a press photographer

The CNN article has more background.
It was no accident as he has also apparently added flares to an Israeli Jet in another picture.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/...eut/index.html

Personally I would use PS CS2's spot heal tool to remove dust spots not the clone tool. He would have to have PS 6 or earlier to not have at least the heal tool.
__________________
"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher.com/photoequipment.htm
Longwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #14
PacAce
Moderator
 
PacAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ABE, PA USA
Posts: 26,408
Default Re: More photo manipulation by a press photographer

They should have fired the editor, too. The cloning is so obvous I'm surprised the editor didn't catch it before it was ever published.
__________________
...Leo
PacAce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of August 2006 (Tue)   #15
UncleDoug
Senior Member
 
UncleDoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 1,103
Default Re: More photo manipulation by a press photographer

Quote:
Originally Posted by PacAce
They should have fired the editor, too. The cloning is so obvous I'm surprised the editor didn't catch it before it was ever published.
Second this motion!

"There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image,"

That about says it.
__________________
-Uncle Doug
Canon 5D & 7D
Nikon D200 -
Mac and PC environment
VTour
UncleDoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I get the RAW images from a wedding photographer? NoahKrueger Weddings and Other Family Events 37 25th of July 2007 (Wed) 21:34
Photographer exposed for altering published photos jevidon The Business of Photography 27 17th of April 2007 (Tue) 17:42
staff photographer sacked for altering image JX General Photography Talk 19 13th of February 2007 (Tue) 23:42
Should I give my images to the hired photographer at the wedding? SonicYan Weddings and Other Family Events 63 11th of October 2006 (Wed) 16:13
NC photographer fired for manipulating photos tweatherred General Photography Talk 40 5th of August 2006 (Sat) 07:46


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.