![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 305
|
hi everybody,
the canon 100mm /2.8 Macro prooved to be one of the best lenses for macrophotography with SLR cameras. its view angle is about 24 degrees in full frame, in 10D , it should be reduced to about 15. did anyone try it with 10D? is the "5X magnigfication" canon 65mm Macro better with a 10D thx in advance |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 15,543
|
Sure, I use this 100mm f2.8 Macro with my 10D quite a bit. It's an excellent lens with full time manual focus and excellent edge-to-edge sharpness. It has great color rendition and excellent contrast.
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 50
|
this is a fantastic lens. it takes great pics.
don't just take my word for it have a look at http://www.photozone.de/2Equipment/easytxt.htm#F100 where it scores 4.57 (5) = outstanding! |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
sure, the MP65 is also a great lens. but you only can use it for macrowork from 1-5 magnification. I think its more for real extreme macro work. sometimes you maybe dont want a magnification that high. the 100mm can be used as a normal 100mm telephoto as well. so I only can recommend this lens! best regards Peter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
Sorted by Canon and rating... Canon EF 2.8 300mm USM L IS 4.82 (2) = outstanding! Canon TS-E 2.8 90mm 4.72 (2) = outstanding! Canon EF 2.8 400mm USM L II 4.60 (3) = outstanding! Canon EF 2.8 100mm Macro 4.57 (5) = outstanding! Canon EF 2.0 135mm USM LÂ* 4.52 (5) = outstanding! Canon EF 2.8 300mm USM LÂ* 4.50 (3) = outstanding!Â* Canon EF 1.8 200mm USM L 4.46 (3) = excellent Canon EF 1.8 85mm USM 4.45 (5) = excellent Canon EF 2.8 400mm USM L IS 4.45 (3)Â* = excellentÂ* Canon EF 2.8 200mm USM L IIÂ* 4.40 (4) = excellentÂ* Canon EF 2.5 50mm MacroÂ* 4.34 (4) = excellent Canon EF 4.0 300mm USM LÂ* 4.34 (3) = excellentÂ* Canon EF 2.8 100mm USM Macro 4.25 (2) = excellent Canon EF 3.5 180mm USM L MacroÂ* 4.20 (4) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 4.0 600mm USM L 4.18 (2) = very good Canon EF 4.0 70-200mm USM L 4.17 (3) = very-good Canon EF 2.8 28-70mm USM LÂ* 4.15 (5) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 1.2 85mm USM LÂ* 4.12 (3) = very-good Canon EF 2.8 24-70mm USM L 4.11 (3) = very-good Canon EF 4.0 600mm USM L IS 4.11 (2) = very good Canon EF 2.8 70-200mm USM L ISÂ* 4.10 (2) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 2.8 80-200mm LÂ* 4.07 (5) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 2.8 70-200mm USM LÂ* 4.07 (3) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 4.5 500mm USM LÂ* 4.07 (2) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 4.0 300mm USM L ISÂ* 4.04 (5) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 2.8 16-35mm USM LÂ* 3.97 (3) = very-good Canon EF 1.4 50mm USMÂ* 3.96 (5) = very-good Canon EF 4.5-5.6 100-400mm USM L IS 3.94 (5) = very-good Canon EF 1.8 50mm IIÂ* 3.91 (3) = very-good Canon EF 1.4 35mm USM LÂ* 3.90 (3) = very-good Canon EF 2.8 28mm 3.86 (4) = very-goodÂ* Canon EF 4.0 17-40mm USM LÂ* 3.74 (2) = good Canon EF 2.8 24mmÂ* 3.70 (3) = good Canon EF 2.0 100mm USMÂ* 3.69 (3) = good Canon EF 2.8 135mm Softfocus 3.69 (3) = good Canon EF 1.0 50mm L USMÂ* 3.64 (3) = good Canon EF 2.8-4.0 28-80mm USM LÂ* 3.56 (4) = goodÂ* Canon EF 5.6 400mm USM L 3.56 (3) = good Canon EF 2.0 35mmÂ* 3.50 (4) = goodÂ* Canon EF 2.8 14mm USM L 3.44 (3) = good Canon EF 4.0 400mm USM DO ISÂ* 3.43 (2) = good Canon EF 2.8 20mmÂ* 3.36 (4) = goodÂ* Canon EF 2.8 17-35mm USM LÂ* 3.26 (5) = goodÂ* Canon EF 3.5-5.6 28-135mm ImageStabilizer 3.25 (5) = good Canon EF 3.5-5.6 35-350mm USM L 3.23 (5) = average Canon EF 1.8 28mm USMÂ* 3.22 (4) = average Canon EF 2.8 20-35mm LÂ* 3.22 (3) = averageÂ* Canon EF 3.5-4.5 20-35mm USMÂ* 3.18 (5) = averageÂ* Canon EF 3.5-4.5 70-210mm USMÂ* 3.12 (4) = averageÂ* Canon EF 5.6 100-300mm LÂ* 3.05 (3) = averageÂ* Canon EF 3.5-4.5 28-105mm USM (II) 3.00 (4) = average Canon EF 1.4 24mm USM L 2.88 (3) = average Canon EF 4.5-5.6 80-200mm USMÂ* 2.77 (3) = averageÂ* Canon EF 4-5.6 28-105mm USM 2.75 (2) = average Canon EF 3.5-4.5 24-85mm USM 2.73 (4) = sub-average Canon EF 4-5.6 75-300mm USM ISÂ* 2.62 (5) = sub-average Canon EF 4-5.6 28-90mm (USM) II 2.52 (2) = sub-average Canon EF 4.5-5.6 100-300mm USMÂ* 2.45 (4) = sub-averageÂ* Canon EF 3.5-5.6 28-200mm USM 2.38 (2) = sub-average Canon EF 4.5-5.6 55-200mm USM 2.35 (3) = sub-average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,040
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Canon Fanosapien
|
Hey Figment, thanks for compiling that list!
__________________
Tom 5D III, 7D, & various lenses |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
__________________
If in doubt, I shut up... Gear: 40D, 12-24mm AT-X Pro, 17-85mm, Sigma 150mm Macro Sigma 100-300 F4, 550EX, other stuff that probably helps me on my way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
- for macro the angle of view doesn't matter. what matters is the magnification and working distance. the 100mm goes to 1:1 whereas the 65mm goes to from 1:1 to 5:1. the working distance of the latter is smaller. - the 65mm macro doesn't focus to infinity. it's for macro macro only. remember: 1:1 magnification means that a 22mm object fills your frame with the 100/2.8 on a 10D. hope this helps --Jens-- |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flash & Macrophotography | 4mr4do4sho | Macro | 17 | 15th of January 2007 (Mon) 14:04 |
| Flash & Macrophotography | 4mr4do4sho | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 1 | 12th of January 2007 (Fri) 14:34 |
| Flash macrophotography and FEC settings | LordV | Macro | 3 | 13th of October 2006 (Fri) 23:48 |
| Macrophotography | Kelpie | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 43 | 9th of June 2005 (Thu) 19:57 |
| galerie of macrophotography (close-up photography) | SKR1 | Macro | 3 | 11th of September 2004 (Sat) 13:03 |