![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
|
Is anyone using a EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS lens with a 2x II Extender?
How are the results? Any words of caution? Is it a good choice for a "poor man's" 600mm (800mm, that is)? Any photos?
__________________
Canon 1D Mark III~Canon 30D~BG-E2 Grip~100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM~70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM~EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM~35mm f/1.8L~EF 50mm f/1.8 II~580 EX~Gary Fong LSII~ThinkTank Gear~AlienBees ABR800 w/30" & 56"MU~AlienBees AB800s~Adobe Lightroom 2.0~DxO 5.0~Dfine 2.0 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
|
LightRules,
LOL...reading between the lines are you saying "bad idea"?
__________________
Canon 1D Mark III~Canon 30D~BG-E2 Grip~100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM~70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM~EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM~35mm f/1.8L~EF 50mm f/1.8 II~580 EX~Gary Fong LSII~ThinkTank Gear~AlienBees ABR800 w/30" & 56"MU~AlienBees AB800s~Adobe Lightroom 2.0~DxO 5.0~Dfine 2.0 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
dǝǝɥs ɐ ʎq pǝʞuɐds
|
With 1.4 it is on the edge of unacceptable in great light; 2x I cannot imagine using.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 12,463
|
Not very good either.
__________________
GEAR LIST http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...&postcount=842 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
|
<checking REMOVE from B&H Cart>
__________________
Canon 1D Mark III~Canon 30D~BG-E2 Grip~100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM~70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM~EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM~35mm f/1.8L~EF 50mm f/1.8 II~580 EX~Gary Fong LSII~ThinkTank Gear~AlienBees ABR800 w/30" & 56"MU~AlienBees AB800s~Adobe Lightroom 2.0~DxO 5.0~Dfine 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,187
|
The only lenses the 2xII really works well on are the 200 2.8L, 135L, and the 300 2.8L IS and up.
__________________
Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Sigmonster = Sigma 300-800? Sorry, I'm really interested in finding out about the 2x since I just rented one from rentglass.com along with a 400mm
__________________
Gear List |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"flat out embarrassing"
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
|
How about using a 1.4x Extender on the 1-4 instead?
__________________
Canon 1D Mark III~Canon 30D~BG-E2 Grip~100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM~70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM~EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM~35mm f/1.8L~EF 50mm f/1.8 II~580 EX~Gary Fong LSII~ThinkTank Gear~AlienBees ABR800 w/30" & 56"MU~AlienBees AB800s~Adobe Lightroom 2.0~DxO 5.0~Dfine 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
Posts: 16,187
|
I was just talking currently produced Canon lenses, but yeah.
__________________
Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 70-200mm f/2.8L USM with 2x extender versus 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | dogface | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 9 | 4th of June 2007 (Mon) 06:27 |
| 100-400mm L lens | jamil | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 5 | 2nd of December 2005 (Fri) 15:57 |
| Please recommend a 100-300L or 100-400mm L lens | Kirik | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 18 | 20th of October 2004 (Wed) 14:25 |
| 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L or 70-200mm 2.8L w/2.0x Extender | Moody Blues | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 15 | 6th of October 2004 (Wed) 08:58 |
| D30 +1.4 Extender +100-400mm = Won't Autofocus | gthorn | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 5 | 18th of December 2003 (Thu) 07:38 |