![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Guys and Gals. I am thoroughly disgusted. I am not an expert by any stretch in fact I have relied on auto settings (both flash and camera) for most of my weddings but I cannot get my system to stop underexposing my shots particularly reception shots. I am also not a newbie, I have shot wedding for 17 years. I have had a constant problem with by flash exposure since switching to digital 5 years ago. It happened with my 20D, 1d MKII, and now the 1DS MKIII. I have gone through 420, 580ex, and now 580EXII. I shoot the 1dsMKIII in P and set the 580II on ETTL with the Lightsphere clear and a newton bracket. these shots were FEC +2/3 using the Quantum Turbo battery. WHAT AM I DOING WRONG!?!?!? This is ridiculous. These shots are terrible.
![]() ISO 1000 F2.8 42mm. I was only 10 feet away. ![]() iso 1000 f 4.5 42mm 10 feet away. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
Just so we have all the facts, can you post the EXIF data.
__________________
Lots of cameras, lights and lenses. www.jhinklephoto.zenfolio.com www.modelmayhem.com/740591 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
both were at 1/125th of a second and split metering
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,020
|
I'm a total newb, but am I right to say that your exposure could have been a couple stops slower? Also, where are you bouncing your flash? Lastly, maybe ditch the sphere and just bounce the flash off the walls and ceiling, cause to me it looks like the room you're in is bright enough in color to reflect plenty of light and soften your image a whole lot better.
Oh yeah, don't forget that if you're bouncing flash straight up, use the built in catch card on the 580EX II. It's very useful for the slight bit of fill.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Batteries? We don't need no...
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Hong Kong
Posts: 11,952
|
Wait wait wait. You've been shooting weddings for 17 years and you're using auto?
Well...try ditching the lightsphere (gary fong is a joke), bounce, and set your ETTL-II metering to average instead of evaluative. The last one'll make a big difference, but it'll help to try and understand why.
__________________
Perry | flickr | C&C ALWAYS welcome | Gear POTN Toronto | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky [READ THIS] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Master Flasher
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
Posts: 18,988
|
When ever there is significant white in the shot, you'll likely need more than +2/3 FEC.
You may have better luck by switching to Average E-TTL metering (custom function on the camera). The default setting (Evaluative E-TTL) will almost always make white stuff grey.
__________________
"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally Chicago area POTN events Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible | Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash | How to Use Flash Outdoors | Excel-based DOF Calculator |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ABE, PA USA
Posts: 26,397
|
Quote:
BTW, Average metering would make white stuff gray, too. The only difference between Average and Evaluative flash metering is how much of the frame is used for the metering.
__________________
...Leo Last edited by PacAce : 9th of March 2008 (Sun) at 18:37. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Master Flasher
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
Posts: 18,988
|
Read the RebelXT instruction manual. It's one of the custom functions.
__________________
"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally Chicago area POTN events Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible | Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash | How to Use Flash Outdoors | Excel-based DOF Calculator |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,020
|
Well, I mentioned shutter speed in terms of the ambient light int he bg, but I overlooked the ISO aspect of that equation to compensation for the dark background. Just playing devil's advocate and keeping the information in this thread relevent, wouldn't it be feasible to say that dropping exposure 1/40 is reasonable (42mm FL) to minimize relying on ISO and noise?
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
I have had very good luck with the LS. Besides this problem happens with and without the sphere. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Westminster, Canada
Posts: 10,924
|
[quote=Thomas Lunt;5080902]...I have shot wedding for 17 years. ...I shoot the 1dsMKIII in P./quote]
As has been said already these are your two main issues. You have to expose for the ambient light and use your flash as fill. ISO 1000 indoors at a wedding? Uh no. Try 1600, shoot at 3.2 and bounce your flash off the ceiling. Chuck that fong thing in the garbage. And yes, set your ETTL-II metering to average instead of evaluative with say +2/3 of FEC. 1/125 seems a bit high at 42mm with flash. 1/80th would have done it just fine. Flash is not setup right in your custom function yes but you are not exposing for the ambient. You'll still have ghosts in the dark. With ETTL you will get a massive reflection off her dress and the +2/3 FEC will come into play. Maybe even +1. But shoot in M with ETTL. Your life will be much easier. But don't perform this switch at or during a wedding. Shoot a family event or some pets etc and get the hang of M. Doesn't take long and you could probably charge a lot for more your pics after that since the quality will go up.
__________________
jasonhollister.com Think your camera is noisy at high ISO? Click here People will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
|
Do you think that 1/125th was just too fast or is this a metering issue?
What setting do you guys use during receptions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
|
I want to thank everyone for taking the time to help. This is frustrating. I don't want to come across as defensive about the LS issue but for those of you that have said get rid of it, have any of you shot with it. I actually like it. It really spreads the light around and softens it nicely (when I get the exposure right) but I will say it again, this issue is happening without the ls too.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When do you throw in the towel? | scottycam | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 0 | 19th of November 2007 (Mon) 19:29 |
| Never throw anything away. | SRPhotographic | Accessories & Storage | 9 | 18th of September 2007 (Tue) 22:44 |
| Throw me in the right direction please! | Crashoran | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 12 | 21st of February 2007 (Wed) 21:30 |
| Throw them my way... | MagicallyDelicious | The POTN Lounge | 18 | 19th of September 2006 (Tue) 16:20 |
| Why throw them .. | SamerJ | Still Life, B/W & Experimental | 0 | 28th of March 2005 (Mon) 08:40 |