![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
|
I'm a beginner photography student and have an assignment to demonstrate shallow depth of field, is this photograph good? Thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Its a good photograph but I don't think it shows DoF as well as it could. You don't really know if there's 1 foot in focus or 20 feet in focus due to the distance of the background.
Try a shot of a computer keyboard or piano keys maybe where you can see a few keys in focus and ones before and after out of focus.
__________________
Jeff 50D Grrrrip'd | Tokina 12-24 | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 28-135 IS| 430EX Astrophotograpy: Meade 10" LX200/UHTC, Orion 5" Mak, Vixen 80mm f/5, Coronado PST, Atlas EQ-G to keep it all off the ground. MY AIRPLANE PICS | MY ASTRO PICS |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Ditto
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Goldmember
|
Ditto 2. But I'd try shooting a face with eyes sharp nose and ears soft ... etc
__________________
EOS 5D II, 40D, Sony R1, Olympus 1030, Canon S5-IS. "Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." A. Hamilton |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 10,507
|
I think you would want something with both the foreground and background out of focus, leaving just a small margin in focus (in which to put your subject). Here's what I mean. The photo isn't very good (bird is a bit soft), but it does demonstrate shallow DOF pretty well I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
But save that photo for the assignment on bokeh...
__________________
7D, Sigma 8-16, 17-55, 70-200 2.8 IS, 580ExII, ........Searching for Talent & Skill; Will settle for Blind Luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
|
Thanks everyone although I did have to look up bokeh. I thought I understood as I did these other 2 during the week but figured the doh wasn't accurate for the assignment and thought I nailed it (although the ring shot is kind of like the bird one). I will try again. I'll included the 2 I was talking about. I will keep working on it...thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
|
okay been working...is this accomplishing the goal here? Thanks for the feedback
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wherever crappy photography is happening.
Posts: 1,835
|
Try a newspaper or a book....find a line/passage/word you like and focus on that with the lens stopped up to the lowest (numerical) fstop your lens is capable of and focus on the part of the print you've selected.
Take the shot at a 45º from the page. Something like this (just a quick shot to provide an example, this is by no means a good photo). IMG_0075.jpg
__________________
Matt Moore ← click for proof that good gear ≠ good photos Underneath this flabby exterior lies an enormous lack of photographic talent. www.theArtOfMoore.com Last edited by MattMoore : 19th of December 2008 (Fri) at 21:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
|
Okay so the wine bottle didn't work. Thanks for everyone's help guess I will figure it out.
Feeling frusturated... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
|
Try something with a background that is continuous with the foreground. The mistake (in my opinion, of course) that you're doing is having an object against a blurred background. Something like a street or anything with some perspective might look good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
|
My assingment states to do this: Your subject should fill most of the frame, but some of the background should also be visible. Choose a location in which the background is busy and would be distracting if it were in focus, do not use a featureless background.
That's why I thought the Poinsetta photo or the wine one fit the description...hmmm. thanks for all the advice |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 10,507
|
What you are describing here as your assignment is not to 'demonstrate shallow depth of field.' You just want a nice bokeh...
Last edited by Levina de Ruijter : 20th of December 2008 (Sat) at 09:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
|
How about some interesting sign (has to be very interesting) filling in most of the frame, but with a street in view, people and cars and whatnot, but all blurred? Ok, I just got stuck with this street idea, sorry. Hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10
|
Sorry for the confusion.
Kristian- Yeah you are stuck on the street idea |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| looking for feedback | cdmonkey | Critique Corner | 8 | 26th of March 2008 (Wed) 17:33 |
| Always Looking for feedback | rob1den | Nature & Landscapes | 2 | 29th of May 2007 (Tue) 08:06 |
| feedback | shalomjt | Critique Corner | 5 | 13th of February 2007 (Tue) 17:32 |
| Need some feedback please. | dR_MoSEs | People | 5 | 11th of February 2007 (Sun) 15:16 |
| Looking for some feedback. | Sam | Critique Corner | 9 | 1st of September 2005 (Thu) 17:45 |