![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
A friend wants me to shoot her paintings.
I believe they are on canvas and are not behind glass... Any links to tips? I've googled and only found some pretty basic stuff. I'm curious about ALL aspects.. lighting, lenses(focal length), setup, etc.. Thanks
__________________
B 30D ● 5D ● Canon 24-70/2.8L ● Canon 17-40/4.0L ● Canon 50/1.4 ● Canon 100mm/2.8 Macro ● 2xVivitar 285HVs ● 430EX ● Cybersync Flash Triggers ● AB800 ● AB400 ● Vagabond II |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Rare exception that I didn't say anything stupid"
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canadian Arctic
Posts: 9,020
|
A lot of painters opt to have their work scanned rather than photographed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
Posts: 18,500
|
Quote:
You will want to do some very serious color control. You need to make sure that your monitor is properly calibrated (using both hardware - a colorimeter - and software) before attempting such a project. You will need at least a known neutral reference card and, preferably something like a Color Checker card to get your images displaying the proper colors. What is your background with lighting? What do you have for lighting modifiers?
__________________
Skip Douglas A few cameras and over 45 years behind them ..... ..... but still learning all the time. |
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 6,111
|
Ensure you are shooting at 90 deg to the painting.
Yes it is possible to alter the shape in PP but it does reduce the quality - better to capture i t right first time. As Skip has said, WB is critical so do a custom WB. Even correcting in RAW might not get a 100% accurate WB. Lightingwise, try to make sure the lighting is as even as possible. If need be use a diffuser to reduce any bright spots.
__________________
Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams Keep calm and carry a camera! My Gear |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. E. Michigan
Posts: 64,303
|
__________________
FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything... Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers. www.FrankCizek.com Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET! Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch? Last edited by PhotosGuy : 25th of March 2012 (Sun) at 09:17. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a semi-civilized small town in southeastern Arizona.
Posts: 12,755
|
1. Use a macro lens of 100mm or longer. That's a real macro lens, not just some lens that has "Macro" on it.
2. Mount the camera absolutely perpendicular to the subject both vertically and horizontally. 3. Distance the camera so that the subject almost but not quite fills the frame. Crop later. 4. Use two equidistant and identical diffuse light sources at 45° to the subject at its centerline. 5. Use custom white balance.
__________________
If you think your lense has an aperature, you really are an amature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
Only use FF bodies to shoot artwork. It does the artist an injustice to use anything else.
1. Use FF 2. Use L glass 3. Shoot at 90 degrees (perpendicular to artwork) 4. Shoot sections/quadrants, then stick together for higher final resolution
__________________
5DII | 28-135mm IS USM | 50mm II | HVX200 No trees were harmed in the creation of this post; however, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
I would think under such controlled circumstances the FF/L doesn't have much advantage. If you were to shoot in quadrants how would you reliably move the camera around?
__________________
B 30D ● 5D ● Canon 24-70/2.8L ● Canon 17-40/4.0L ● Canon 50/1.4 ● Canon 100mm/2.8 Macro ● 2xVivitar 285HVs ● 430EX ● Cybersync Flash Triggers ● AB800 ● AB400 ● Vagabond II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 168
|
The recommendation of using a real 1:1 macro lens is good. Macro lenses are designed to be sharp from "edge to edge". I have the 100f2 and it is good, but a macro lens will out perform it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Ive never used a true dedicated macro lens so I have no idea.
__________________
B 30D ● 5D ● Canon 24-70/2.8L ● Canon 17-40/4.0L ● Canon 50/1.4 ● Canon 100mm/2.8 Macro ● 2xVivitar 285HVs ● 430EX ● Cybersync Flash Triggers ● AB800 ● AB400 ● Vagabond II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a semi-civilized small town in southeastern Arizona.
Posts: 12,755
|
Quote:
A true macro lens is a prime lens (there is no such thing as a zoom macro lens) that has a couple of things going for it that non-macro lenses lack: an extremely flat plane of focus; and a long focus ring travel. A macro lens has an extremely flat plane of focus because one of its primary uses is as a copy lens. This, of course, makes it ideal for shooting artwork, which is essentially copying, where a sharp corner-to-corner focus is required. A macro lens has a long focus ring travel because it is usually focused manually at distances where the depth of field is extremely shallow and focusing is critical. Again, this makes it ideal for shooting flat artwork, as the focus can easily be adjusted exactly on. Ideally, a split prism focus screen would be used. Beware, however, of non-macro lenses labeled "Macro." This is purely a marketing ploy, and many lenses are so labeled. Many such lenses are truly optically atrocious.
__________________
If you think your lense has an aperature, you really are an amature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
"hangs around male genitalia"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Aussie living in Laos
Posts: 12,671
|
Most "normal" lenses camera weren't designed to shoot two dimensional subjects like artwork, documents or brickwalls.. Normal lenses have too much of a fall off in resolution from edge to edge, corner to corner,, and in many cases curvature of field and barrel and/or pin cushion distortion.. Zoom lenses are worse.. This kind of photography is reserved for flat field lenses which are rare and very expensive.. The best option for artwork photography are macro lenses..
__________________
Jurgen 50D~20D~EOS M~S95 http://www.pbase.com/jurgentreue The Title Fairy,, off with her head!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
|
The advice about shooting only with FF is just silly IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs, IL
Posts: 724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
|
I'd suggest exposure bracketing your shots so you can have the opportunity to create hdr photos as well.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to photograph paintings and glass-covered artwork? | ToddR | Still Life, B/W & Experimental Talk | 4 | 10th of March 2009 (Tue) 23:05 |
| Shooting artwork, what to charge | TroPhoto | The Business of Photography | 4 | 21st of October 2006 (Sat) 08:25 |
| shooting paintings | Grain | General Photography Talk | 8 | 13th of October 2006 (Fri) 09:52 |
| Paintings | John Ellis | Wildlife | 1 | 2nd of January 2006 (Mon) 11:43 |