Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Urban Life & Travel Talk 
Thread started 25 Sep 2010 (Saturday) 17:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Becareful Photographing Water Towers

 
AB8ND
Senior Member
Avatar
745 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
     
Sep 25, 2010 17:16 |  #1

Man's 'nerdy' hobby lands him in hot water after taking photos of Kentwood water tower.
http://****/23volc4 (external link)

Jack




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
kendon
Senior Member
Avatar
839 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: germany
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:00 |  #2

no offense, but sounds like a pretty dumb story to me. first, he could have given his name and reason to take pictures to the workers. i wouldn't like to do that either, but the second i feel harrassed by these people i would call the cops. not offering that they should be called, but call them myself. i am fairly sure that this would have helped to clear the situation.

imagine it being the other way around: he was taking pictures because he wanted to attack the water tower. if the workers had said "na, he's probably just some nerdy guy taking pics for fun" everybody would have a go at them now for not being careful/thoughtful enough...


7D, EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55, EF 70-200/4 IS, NiftyFifty, 580EXII, Σ 30 EX DC, Walimex 8mm Fisheye, MD Rokkor 50/1.4, BendyCam (external link), Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
Avatar
53,872 posts
Likes: 1485
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:08 |  #3

kendon wrote in post #10986495 (external link)
....imagine it being the other way around: he was taking pictures because he wanted to attack the water tower. if the workers had said "na, he's probably just some nerdy guy taking pics for fun" everybody would have a go at them now for not being careful/thoughtful enough...

I really believe that this is the root cause of most of the silliness that happens today. With all the lawyers cruising around just looking for someone to sue, one misstep can lead to years of legal problems and being dragged through the mud in the papers.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12Rock
Senior Member
605 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2010
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:11 |  #4

People like this drive me nuts ... we all know its a new world out here . These folks are just being safe , so answer the question and be done with , making this a big no story here keep moving. People use your common sense.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:12 |  #5

The officials said they werent concerned about the photo, but the reason he was taking it? The water tower is featured on the city website as a town landmark so one would imagine that its occasionally photographed. Sounds like a bunch of overzealous utility workers trying to add a little excitement to a boring day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,415 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:21 |  #6

so you think we should stop and ask every person we see with a camera taking a picture of something that could be a target?

If you're standing on public or your own private property - they can ask - you don't have to answer. Obviously the right approach once asked is to be polite and respectful of whoever is asking, even if they don't have any kind of authority - but if someone forces the issue, I'd stand my ground as long as I know I'm in the clear.

You have rights - and it seems more and more we have to stand up for this very basic of rights!


5D3 x2 / 5D2 / 1D IV / 6D
Sig85 /35L/100L/135L/16-35L II/70-200L II/100-400L
B400 x2 / B800 x2 / ABR800 / VML x2
600EX x5
TT5 x8 /
PW TT1 / AC3 x3 / AC9 x4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
75D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,504 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:30 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #7

Identifying himself and the reason for taking the picture would have been the correct thing to do. By his actions he brought suspicion on himself and he deserves whatever comes out of this incident.
You have to be somewhat out of touch not to realize that if you take a picture of a Public Utility you stand a good chance of being questioned by someone in authority or even a concrned citizen. Taking the attitude that it is none of their business will only lead to an escalation of the situation and you will always lose in the end.
Yes some people may say that it is my right to take pictures of what I want, the reality is times have changed and you have to accept it.
How are your right diminished if you, in a pleasant manner, tell them why you are taking the picture and where you live?
Just because you are a white person with a ponytail doesn't mean you're not a terrorist. Was it a middle east person who was convicted for the Oklahoma bombing?
We need to understand that the world has changed and accept that we should not react in a defensive manner when asked why we are taking a picture.


40D Rebel XT
Kit Lens 18-55mm
EF 50mm 1.8 II
90-300 Canon EF
Sigma 17-70 2.8-4.5 Macro, Sigma 70-200 2.8, Sigma 10-20 3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
e02937
Goldmember
2,714 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:33 |  #8

12Rock wrote in post #10986548 (external link)
People like this drive me nuts ... we all know its a new world out here . These folks are just being safe , so answer the question and be done with , making this a big no story here keep moving. People use your common sense.

Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.


Canon 7d
[15-85 IS] [70-200
f/4L IS] [I'm a PC]
[Full gear list and feedback]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hawkeye60
Goldmember
Avatar
2,079 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:43 |  #9

I think it's absolutely ridiculous how authorities have somehow managed to link photography with terrorism.

Has there ever been one single terrorist attack who's source can be traced back to photography?


It's a lens not a lense!
The truest test of character is what you do when you think no one is looking.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ the ­ Geek
Senior Member
Avatar
911 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: South Bend, IN
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:50 as a reply to  @ SMP_Homer's post |  #10

I love the comments.

There is the slight possibility that I might just "blow them up" . . . . PHOTOGRAPHICALLY! (It's called "enlarging").

I'm going to shoot the water tower with my camera and blow it up to 16x20.

Someone also pointed out that he has the right to remain silent, especially to someone who does not have the authority to demand that info from him. I think I'd have called the cops myself.

=)


Canon Gear: 7D Gripped :: 16-35mm ƒ/2.8L II :: 24-70mm ƒ/2.8L :: 70-200mm ƒ/2.8L IS II :: 28mm ƒ/1.8 :: 50mm ƒ/1.4 :: 85mm ƒ/1.8 :: 200mm ƒ/2.8L II :: 180mm ƒ/3.5L Macro :: Extenders 1.4x II and 2x II :: Speedlites 430EX II (x2) and MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite
www.focalmagic.com (external link) (Under construction)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 27, 2010 10:52 |  #11

hawkeye60 wrote in post #10986762 (external link)
I think it's absolutely ridiculous how authorities have somehow managed to link photography with terrorism.

Has there ever been one single terrorist attack who's source can be traced back to photography?

There was one case where a member of a terrorist cell was arrested in NY and was found to have photos he had taken of various potential targets. The authorities claimed that these were taken as part of a scouting mission.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hawkeye60
Goldmember
Avatar
2,079 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
     
Sep 27, 2010 11:40 |  #12

gonzogolf wrote in post #10986810 (external link)
There was one case where a member of a terrorist cell was arrested in NY and was found to have photos he had taken of various potential targets. The authorities claimed that these were taken as part of a scouting mission.

By source I meant that were it not for the photograph it could not have occured. As in the source of a terrorist attack was an explosive or a weapon, or plane, etc. Perhaps the word "source" was a poor choice.


It's a lens not a lense!
The truest test of character is what you do when you think no one is looking.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 115
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Sep 27, 2010 11:54 |  #13

Good for this guy to stand up. Most wouldn't, and that's the problem.

If you're going to force everyone to live by rules, then you have to follow them. It's that simple.

These workers do not have any right to treat someone like this. In all honestly, I'd be pushing for their removal/suspension from their jobs actually.


Year of Night - 365 Night Project - check it out! (external link)

Follow me into the night.
Unique Night Photography - twilightscapes.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
. . . overboard with the tea . . .
Avatar
48,573 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 441
Joined Jan 2008
     
Sep 27, 2010 13:05 |  #14

Todd Lambert wrote in post #10987141 (external link)
Good for this guy to stand up. Most wouldn't, and that's the problem.

If you're going to force everyone to live by rules, then you have to follow them. It's that simple.

These workers do not have any right to treat someone like this. In all honestly, I'd be pushing for their removal/suspension from their jobs actually.

I agree with you, Todd. As a foreigner in the US, and of a dark skin colour, I get the beady eye at me all the time, esp with a DSLR around town. But heck, there are hundreds of tourists each day with the same thing, but they don't get the stares. Talk about PC gone insane. Why not just shut the borders and close the internet and have the post office screen all mail if you can't take a photo even on public property.

The guy in the article, could potentially sue the town for aggressive behaviour, and could walk away with a sum of money that is paid for by the tax payer.

You can't take a photo of a mall, a water tower, a bridge, planes, roads, buildings, you name it. But all a terrorist needs to do is download google earth and hey presto, all the information is right there :) Stupid.


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 27, 2010 13:16 |  #15

We had a situation here in Springfield Illinois a few years back. The local police and the security force were aggressively chasing and questioning anyone who was spotted taking photos of the coal fired powerplant on the shore of Lake Springfield. Each time they stopped someone it would appear in the paper, or the online edition of the newspapers website about someone being stopped for suspicious behavior. Given that the powerplant is visible from an interstate, and several miles of lake shore its a very public landmark and by no means a secret facility.

A local radio personality finally heard enough stories of security chasing photographers and called their bluff. He put on a turban (for exaggerated effect) and paraded outside the facility with several cameras. Security came out and he finally got them to admit publicly that its not illegal or even improper to photography the facility and to tacitly acknowledge that their previous efforts were overkill. Sometimes it takes an outrageous act to call attention to situations like this.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,994 views & 0 likes for this thread
Becareful Photographing Water Towers
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Urban Life & Travel Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is binyahmmad
591 guests, 281 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.