Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Fashion, Editorial & Commercial
Thread started 28 Sep 2010 (Tuesday) 10:32
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

POST YOUR FASHION - EDITORIAL PICTURES HERE!!

 
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
umphotography's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Gig Harbor, Washington
Sep 29, 2010 12:02 as a reply to post 11001134 |  #16

I also so agree on this thread. Really get tired of sifting through the T&A to see what some of the guys are doing to light the models. This would be a great idea and probably help a lot of photographers. Wait till you see alejandro sandovals work.

here is my contribution

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_0974-Edit.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_0667-Edit-2.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_0574-Edit-2.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_9789-Edit.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_9622-Edit-2.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_9941-Edit.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/20100610-IMG_8720-Edit.jpg

Mike
www.umphotography.comexternal link
GEAR LIST
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

POST 11001329
HAS BEEN DELETED.

Motofreak429
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Motofreak429's Avatar
485 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Santa Clarita,CA
Sep 29, 2010 12:21 |  #17

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4027/4637615253_8b3e215208_z.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4063/4462018781_0cc93bea9a_z.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4364571946_e8fa7ddd03_z.jpg

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Canon 5D w/grip 24-70L , 70-200 , Alienbee 800 & 1600 w/ Beauty Dish, Mid Octo, Vagabond, Cybersyncs
JAC-imagesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cr44
Senior Member
cr44's Avatar
675 posts
Joined Jul 2008
currently Charlotte, NC
Sep 29, 2010 12:28 |  #18

Moto, loved your bag shoot!


Craig
Canon 5D, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4L, 15mm fisheye, 20mm, 28mm, Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm, Nifty Fifty, Speedlite 430ex & 580ex2, 85mm f1.8, CyberSyncs ReelWorksProductions.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Motofreak429
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Motofreak429's Avatar
485 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Santa Clarita,CA
Sep 29, 2010 12:33 |  #19

lens pirate wrote in post #11000998external link
This is the only picture so far that is not a perfect fit for the current G&N.

I think the issue is where should someone post model pictures /fashion/ editorial when they don't yet have rights to G&N.

I fail to understand why the People section is not ok?

because i don't call my pictures Glamor nor are they nude. quit frankly i don't want to be categorized G&M cause its not the style i want to achieve (no offense to the G&N members) . Although i do have rights to it. Fashion photography TO ME! is one of the biggest industries in the photography world so maybe people talking about it can bring more knowledge than just who can have the best lighting on some T&A

G&N photography is WAY different than fashion editorial - photography and should be separated.


Canon 5D w/grip 24-70L , 70-200 , Alienbee 800 & 1600 w/ Beauty Dish, Mid Octo, Vagabond, Cybersyncs
JAC-imagesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lens ­ pirate
Goldmember
lens pirate's Avatar
1,643 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Sep 29, 2010 12:41 |  #20

umphotography wrote in post #11001329external link
class just began:cool:

Its clear you like this posters work. So do I. However that image would be well suited to G&N or People. I am still not clear why there needs to be a additonal section for a nebulous group of pictures that already fit into current catagories.

Where does this end? It think you mentioned getting tired of looking at T&A to get to pictures more to your liking. I have some sympathy for that.

I get really tired of countless really stupid looking "fashion" shots of average looking women and silly clothing in contrived situations just to see some really well executed nudes. Sometimes G&N looks like a CK ad. Its a cross I have to bear.

I think the forum would be better served by breaking off nudes altogether from Fashion/editorial/glam​our/people.


INSANE GEAR LIST
Sun flare.... the new selective color. JUST SAY NO

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alejandro ­ Sandoval
Goldmember
Alejandro Sandoval's Avatar
2,476 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Toronto, Canada
Sep 29, 2010 12:48 |  #21

lens pirate wrote in post #11001520external link
Its clear you like this posters work. So do I. However that image would be well suited to G&N or People. I am still not clear why there needs to be a additonal section for a nebulous group of pictures that already fit into current catagories.

Where does this end? It think you mentioned getting tired of looking at T&A to get to pictures more to your liking. I have some sympathy for that.

I get really tired of countless really stupid looking "fashion" shots of average looking women and silly clothing in contrived situations just to see some really well executed nudes. Sometimes G&N looks like a CK ad. Its a cross I have to bear.

I think the forum would be better served by breaking off nudes altogether from Fashion/editorial/glam​our/people.

I think you're over reacting a little bit....take a look to some work of th greates Photographers such as Helmut Newton, Irving Penn, they are a class Act, they are art masterpieces.

You can find fully covered Pictures and they are more offensive than what you are arguing...


Twitterexternal linkhttp://www.twitter.com​/Ale_Sandoexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Motofreak429
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Motofreak429's Avatar
485 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Santa Clarita,CA
Sep 29, 2010 12:57 |  #22

lens pirate wrote in post #11001520external link
Where does this end? It think you mentioned getting tired of looking at T&A to get to pictures more to your liking. I have some sympathy for that.

I get really tired of countless really stupid looking "fashion" shots of average looking women and silly clothing in contrived situations just to see some really well executed nudes. Sometimes G&N looks like a CK ad. Its a cross I have to bear.

I think the forum would be better served by breaking off nudes altogether from Fashion/editorial/glam​our/people.

maybe with this seperate section you wont have to look at this "stupid looking fashion shots" and i wont have to look at countless nudes with women who would probably look better with clothing on, and a bag over their face.

G&N = Glamor and Nude
People = Everyday people

you have a section for your nude photography. and others for their people photography.

fashion and editorial doesnt fit in either one. fashion - editorial isnt Nude nor is it glamour, and its just out of range of just your everyday people photography. Not everyone knows agencies.


Canon 5D w/grip 24-70L , 70-200 , Alienbee 800 & 1600 w/ Beauty Dish, Mid Octo, Vagabond, Cybersyncs
JAC-imagesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lens ­ pirate
Goldmember
lens pirate's Avatar
1,643 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Sep 29, 2010 12:58 |  #23

Alejandro Sandoval wrote in post #11001557external link
I think you're over reacting a little bit....take a look to some work of th greates Photographers such as Helmut Newton, Irving Penn, they are a class Act, they are art masterpieces.

You can find fully covered Pictures and they are more offensive than what you are arguing...

Alejandro, just to be clear I am not re-acting to your image at all. I like it. I would love to print it and hang it on my wall. I am not the least bit prudish. My personal feeling is that nudes should be totally main streamed into photograpghy.

I am re-acting with just words and not a great deal of emotion to the notion that there needs to be yet another subsection of this forum for a class of images that fit nicely into current subsections.

I just disagree.

Instead I would rather see nudes broken off into a subsection and that community set standards for itself. That way if people don't want to see nudes they do not have to. Additionally people that like nude art would be able to post, enjoy and learn about it with out falling victim to entirely arbitrary prudishness. Sure seems like a more direct approach to the issue. IMHO


INSANE GEAR LIST
Sun flare.... the new selective color. JUST SAY NO

LOG IN TO REPLY
lens ­ pirate
Goldmember
lens pirate's Avatar
1,643 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Sep 29, 2010 13:00 |  #24

Motofreak429 wrote in post #11001618external link
maybe with this seperate section you wont have to look at this "stupid looking fashion shots" and i wont have to look at countless nudes with women who would probably look better with clothing on, and a bag over their face.

G&N = Glamor and Nude
People = Everyday people

you have a section for your nude photography. and others for their people photography.

fashion and editorial doesnt fit in either one. fashion - editorial isnt Nude nor is it glamour, and its just out of range of just your everyday people photography. Not everyone knows agencies.

I understand your point.


INSANE GEAR LIST
Sun flare.... the new selective color. JUST SAY NO

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alejandro ­ Sandoval
Goldmember
Alejandro Sandoval's Avatar
2,476 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Toronto, Canada
Sep 29, 2010 13:01 as a reply to post 11001134 |  #25

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...34786151_bf71ceda08​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Twitterexternal linkhttp://www.twitter.com​/Ale_Sandoexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lens ­ pirate
Goldmember
lens pirate's Avatar
1,643 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Sep 29, 2010 13:04 |  #26

Alejandro Sandoval wrote in post #11001639 (external link)
NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...34786151_bf71ceda08​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Nice!


INSANE GEAR LIST
Sun flare.... the new selective color. JUST SAY NO

LOG IN TO REPLY
Motofreak429
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Motofreak429's Avatar
485 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Santa Clarita,CA
Sep 29, 2010 13:06 as a reply to Alejandro Sandoval's post |  #27

love your shots..

how do u like dripbook?

i have wix and i kind of dont like it


Canon 5D w/grip 24-70L , 70-200 , Alienbee 800 & 1600 w/ Beauty Dish, Mid Octo, Vagabond, Cybersyncs
JAC-imagesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alejandro ­ Sandoval
Goldmember
Alejandro Sandoval's Avatar
2,476 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Toronto, Canada
Sep 29, 2010 13:14 |  #28

Motofreak429 wrote in post #11001662external link
love your shots..

how do u like dripbook?

i have wix and i kind of dont like it


I really like it but the price is what i really dislike..lol


Twitterexternal linkhttp://www.twitter.com​/Ale_Sandoexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
umphotography's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Gig Harbor, Washington
Sep 29, 2010 13:45 |  #29

lens pirate wrote in post #11001624external link
Instead I would rather see nudes broken off into a subsection and that community set standards for itself. That way if people don't want to see nudes they do not have to. Additionally people that like nude art would be able to post, enjoy and learn about it with out falling victim to entirely arbitrary prudishness. Sure seems like a more direct approach to the issue. IMHO

And i agree here 110%. I think the thing that bothers me the most is that you get someone to get a shot of a gal with a great set of hooters and everyone is like,,EWWWW,,Ahhh.. great shot. And the lighting is horrible, its a paper backdop and nothing else to it and you get 2 pages of OH WOW's.

i dont have a problem with the nudes at all. in fact dean capture has some outstanding work posted recently and the backlighting and lighting in general with his work is phenominal. And i understand that lighting nudes is an art in itself. But i think i prefer lighting like stephen eastwood and some of the other guys that are really really good do over the nudes shots. I think the fashion guys get away with far less when it comes to presenting thier work. Eastwoods work is some of the best out there. I think fashion requirs a little more work because the lighting is more critical and you dont have a naked body to draw your attention away from what photographers do.

just my .02 cents


Mike
www.umphotography.comexternal link
GEAR LIST
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ckalephoto
Goldmember
ckalephoto's Avatar
1,006 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Charlotte, NC
Sep 29, 2010 14:05 |  #30

What I think people dont understand with Fashion Photography, is it's not always about the lighting or the model. With people and G&N, the focus is the person. With fashion, I think it can be more about the Idea. Look at Misha's work on here. It truly does not fit in either group. He now post more in lighting. There are several sites out there with beautiful Fashion photography. I know that if some of the shots were posted in the current thread's the people would get told how bad they are. Then you pick up an issue of Vouge and the shot is on the cover.

Rant off.


Chris

Gear 2)1Ds mark ii/EOS 1V/ 50 1.4/135L 2.0/24-105L 4.0/

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

537,364 views & 772 likes for this thread
POST YOUR FASHION - EDITORIAL PICTURES HERE!!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Fashion, Editorial & Commercial


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00629 for 7 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is thru-the-lens
1149 guests, 628 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016