|1st of October 2010 (Fri)||#1|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Which macro: EF 100mm f/2.8L or 100mm/2.8
I'm trying to decide between which of the Canon macro 100mm lenses to choose.
The L is almost double the price but has IS and better quality. I want to use this lens to photograph flowers, insect life and jewellery, and as an added bonus, portraits. I'm really tempted to buy the non-L and put the rest towards a secondhand full frame body, but I would be interested to hear what others think.
Canon bodies: 50D, 5D
Canon lenses: EF 50mm f/1.4, EF L 17-40mm, EF 100mm macro, EF L 300 f4.0
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Manual For Canon 100mm Macro EF 100mm 2.8 USM||tristay||Canon EF and EF-S Lenses||17||18th of February 2011 (Fri) 13:05|
|Canon EF 100mm vs Sigma AF 105mm vs Tamron AF 90mm vs Tokina AF 100mm ALL MACRO||sandro9mm||Canon EF and EF-S Lenses||23||3rd of October 2009 (Sat) 09:47|
|which combo would you prefer: 60mm macro + 100mm 2 or 50 1.4 + 100mm macro?||spelunker||Canon EF and EF-S Lenses||9||5th of September 2009 (Sat) 14:59|
|(UK-Cumbria) WTB - 85mm f/1.8mm or possibly either a 100mm f/2 or 100mm f/2.8 Macro||gt_junkie||Classifieds: Buy||0||20th of December 2008 (Sat) 05:44|
|Seeking Tokina 100mm Macro vs. Canon 100mm Macro comparison||vjack||Canon EF and EF-S Lenses||22||29th of April 2006 (Sat) 17:46|