Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 01 Oct 2010 (Friday) 11:16
PREV/NEXT

Which macro: EF 100mm f/2.8L or 100mm/2.8

 
JayJay
Member
JayJay's Avatar
75 posts

Joined Nov 2009

France
MORE INFO

I'm trying to decide between which of the Canon macro 100mm lenses to choose.

The L is almost double the price but has IS and better quality. I want to use this lens to photograph flowers, insect life and jewellery, and as an added bonus, portraits. I'm really tempted to buy the non-L and put the rest towards a secondhand full frame body, but I would be interested to hear what others think.

JayJay

Oct 01, 2010 11:16

JayJay
Canon bodies: 50D, 5D
Canon lenses: EF 50mm f/1.4, EF L 17-40mm, EF 100mm macro, EF L 300 f4.0

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,424 posts
GALLERY: 12 photos
Joined Dec 2008

Melbourne, Australia
MORE INFO

If you're shooting portraits as well, you'll benefit from the IS on the L version. Otherwise, they're pretty similar - the L is a tiny bit sharper at f/2.8 and is weather-sealed, but that's just about it.

Oct 01, 2010 11:17



LOG IN TO REPLY
Katalyst
Senior Member
Katalyst's Avatar
811 posts

Joined Feb 2010

The Netherlands
MORE INFO

I had the same problem as you and I went for the non L version, as you said it saves almost half the money and if you're going to shoot portraits I'd use a tripod anyway!

Oct 01, 2010 11:21



LOG IN TO REPLY
shmoogy
Senior Member
505 posts
Joined Dec 2009

Chicago
MORE INFO

Katalyst wrote in post #11014642external link
I had the same problem as you and I went for the non L version, as you said it saves almost half the money and if you're going to shoot portraits I'd use a tripod anyway!

I had the same ideas as you and I went for the L version.

Shooting portraits with a tripod is too much work if you're out and about, and being able to shoot at 1/30 shutter speed was worthwhile for me. The IS isn't all that great for macro purposes.

That being said, I don't really enjoy using it for portraiture, so I will toss in a consideration of 100 non-L for macro, and Rokinon 85 1.4 for portraiture, all for cheaper than the L version.

Oct 01, 2010 12:41

5D Mark II, 35L, 24 TS-E, 50 1.8
Canon 1000D

LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
ben_r_'s Avatar
15,823 posts

Joined Nov 2007

Sacramento, CA
MORE INFO

Since I use my 70-200 2.8 IS II for portraits I never use my 100 macro for that purpose. I have owned both the 100mm macros, and ended up keeping my non-L. I didnt like the Hybrid IS system in the 100L. Sounded clunky and I didnt like how it flops around a bit inside the lens barrel when the lens is unmounted. I didnt like the build quality, IMO is was not up to L standards. As mentioned ealier, IS doesnt really help with macro photography if you use a flash, which I always do. I didnt like that I had to buy an additional $40 adapter to use the 100L with my MT-24EX flash. I didnt like that the 100L was not a standard filter size like 58mm or 77mm which ALL my other lenses match. And lastly, since the IQ for macro is very much the same, there was no gain in IQ from the 100L. Needless to say I returned the 100L and kept my non-L.

Oct 01, 2010 12:46

[Gear List | Flickrexternal link | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
DreDaze
bit by the Supposed Title Fairy
DreDaze's Avatar
15,154 posts
GALLERY: 7 photos
Joined Mar 2006

S.F. Bay Area
MORE INFO

buy the non L, and with your savings buy a flash...

Oct 01, 2010 12:47

Andre or Dre
gear list
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
ben_r_'s Avatar
15,823 posts

Joined Nov 2007

Sacramento, CA
MORE INFO

DreDaze wrote in post #11015156external link
buy the non L, and with your savings buy a flash...

+1 to that!

Oct 01, 2010 12:48

[Gear List | Flickrexternal link | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

LOG IN TO REPLY
rjx
Goldmember
rjx's Avatar
2,666 posts

Joined Oct 2007

Santa Clara, California
MORE INFO

Yeah, you need the flash for bug macro, and other types of macro.

You could also get the 85 1.8 for portraits, and a Kenko extension tube set for macro.

Tamron makes a 60mm f/2 macro which looks pretty nice and is a good portrait length on crop sensors.

Tamron also makes the nice 90mm 2.8 macro. Don't forget Sigma's macro offerings.

I purchased the non L 100mm macro since imo the IS is a waste of money for most macro purposes.

Oct 01, 2010 15:47 as a reply to ben_r_'s post 2 hours earlier.

"It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

LOG IN TO REPLY
JayJay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
JayJay's Avatar
75 posts

Joined Nov 2009

France
MORE INFO

many thanks for so much considered advice. I've made my decision now, the Non L it will be, plus the flash. merci!

Oct 02, 2010 06:20

JayJay
Canon bodies: 50D, 5D
Canon lenses: EF 50mm f/1.4, EF L 17-40mm, EF 100mm macro, EF L 300 f4.0

LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Peacefield's Avatar
4,022 posts

Joined Jul 2008

NJ
MORE INFO

I never pulled the trigger on the 100 macro until L and IS. Better IQ, IS to help when I do macro w/o a tripod (which is most of the time), and I appreciate the lighter weight.

Oct 02, 2010 09:54

Robert Wayne Photographyexternal link

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

LOG IN TO REPLY

941 views & 0 likes for this thread
Which macro: EF 100mm f/2.8L or 100mm/2.8
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00103 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Dawidkubek
968 guests, 799 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014