Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 15 Dec 2010 (Wednesday) 11:40
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Is there really something wrong with the canon 24-70L?

 
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,678 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Dec 15, 2010 22:49 |  #16

ShotByTom wrote in post #11459336external link
I think it's the best lens canon makes...but that's just me! However...on a full frame camera I would take the 24-105...it's perfect for people/portraits.

you're right....it is just you ;).

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 430exII, gitzo 3542, markins Q10, kirk, really right stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,678 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Dec 15, 2010 22:56 as a reply to ed rader's post |  #17

i owned the 24-70L and 24-105L for many years. i recently sold the 24-70L because it's just too damn big and heavy for travel and of course does not have IS.

i prefer the faster lens but for travel i like the longer length and IS. the 24-70L is noticeably better with distortion @ 24mm on FF.

a couple of times with the 24-70L i noticed it backfocussed @ 24mm when shooting wide open or near wide open but it really wasn't a problem for me, and i owned the lens for years and used it on FF, 1.6 and 1.3 crop.

when the 24-70L is redesigned i'll probably get another.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 430exII, gitzo 3542, markins Q10, kirk, really right stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
rockygarcia
Senior Member
390 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Orange County, CA
Dec 16, 2010 00:17 |  #18

Erik_L wrote in post #11460548external link
I took the plunge and bought it new. My thinking is that if it's brand new, it's probably had all the bugs worked out vs one from 2006. Is this true? who knows, but it made me feel better. My copy is very sharp wide open and excellent at f/3.2 and beyond. 24mm is a little soft/missed focus sometimes, but not always. For the most part, i'm very glad I spent $1320 on this lens... and that's saying a lot since I don't have any paid gigs or anything.

"24mm is a little soft/missed focus sometimes"

Mine is the exact same way, mostly really good but soft and some miss focus at 24mm. Is this a issue that can be repaired or just a characteristic of the lens?


1DX | 17-40 F4L | 24-70 2.8L | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 200 2.8L for sale | 70-200 2.8 IS IIL | 300 F4L | 100-400L | Kenko Pro 300 1.4x DGX | 2x Canon Tele III | 430EXII

LOG IN TO REPLY
dkim82
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
dkim82's Avatar
583 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Garden Grove, CA
Dec 16, 2010 01:45 |  #19

This is exactly what I'm wondering- I guess I'll just have to try it out for myself.. You guys are building my curiosity for the 24-105L now!


5d mk2 - Canon 28-70mm f/2.8L - Canon FD 35mm f/2.8 tilt/shift - Zeiss 35-70mm f/3.4 - Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS - Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 -
Epson RD-1 - Voigtlander 35mm f/2.5 Color Skopar
Leica Digilux 2

LOG IN TO REPLY
KVN ­ Photo
Goldmember
KVN Photo's Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Jakarta, Indonesia
Dec 16, 2010 02:02 |  #20

You know what, I have exactly the same dilemma with you when I want to buy this baby. I think I will give it a try and he doesn't let me down. I know many pro photographer using only two lens traveling around the world using only four lens and one of them is 24-70L, I saw the photograph they made and it was awesome. I don't know wether it is the lens or the photographer, but I believe someday I'll find out.

Give it a try, will ya?


X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
TS-E 24 f/3.5L II + XF 35 f/1.4 + XF 56 f/1.2
Sony RX100 II + G12
Travel the world!

LOG IN TO REPLY
octospit
Member
octospit's Avatar
109 posts
Joined Jun 2008
San Jose, CA
Dec 16, 2010 02:31 |  #21

i got mine used..after a while i noticed it had some focusing issues. i sent it in to Canon and found out it's focus housing needed to be replaced. got it back and works perfect. happy with this lens!


Our pictures are our footprints. It’s the best way to tell people we were here. - Joe McNally
Flickrexternal link RDOMINGCILexternal link GEAR
ModelMayhemexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
scav1180
Member
scav1180's Avatar
78 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Torrance, CA
Dec 16, 2010 17:18 |  #22

Here are some of my shots at 24mm and 70mm

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=971561

not the greatest, but whatever distance and lighting, same result.


Canon 5dMii | 50f1.4 | 24-70 | 580EXII

LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Maureen Souza's Avatar
32,652 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Joined Feb 2005
Central California
Dec 16, 2010 17:22 as a reply to post 11460548 |  #23

Mine is fabulous...the most used lens in my collection.


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
5DIII
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 85/1.2 135/2.0, 300/f4, 24-70/2.8 both I & II

LOG IN TO REPLY
kiyoshi25
Member
117 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Japan
Dec 16, 2010 17:54 |  #24

I get to use this lens at my internship on a 5D2 and it works great!


Gear List/Feedback
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
District_History_Fan
Goldmember
2,286 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Dec 16, 2010 18:04 as a reply to kiyoshi25's post |  #25

The 24-70 is really good on FF. On the crops, I was never blown away by the sharpness it produced. It does have great color and an overall polished look to the files regardless of the sensor it is put in front of. One of the things that is a serious flaw with the lens is field curvature issues. Put it on a FF camera and shoot a landscape at 24mm and you'll see what I mean. The edges will probably be quite blurred. That isn't as noticeable on the crop cameras.

All in all, since I shoot crops for my personal work, I went to the 17-55 IS. It is much sharper than my 24-70 was wide open. The only real IQ advantage the 24-70 has over it is smoother bokeh.


www.ericmcferrin.smugm​ug.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,369 views & 0 likes for this thread
Is there really something wrong with the canon 24-70L?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00292 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Brofessor
794 guests, 414 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017