Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting
Thread started 27 Mar 2011 (Sunday) 21:52
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Vagabond II or Mini ?

 
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
BrandonSi's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
Chicago
Apr 02, 2011 11:00 |  #31

eduardofrances wrote in post #12143188external link
By reading Rob Galbraith´s article about the mini and looking on how it performs (worst than every other option including the Vagabond II if you look at the tables with the recycle times ) I don´t think it is really what I would choose for location power even if its main feature is a smaller size and weight. I would go with a Vagabond II, LP 750 or Innovatronix Explorer XT than with a Mini.

There are trade-offs with everything.. Money aside, I'd rather have three mini's, each dedicated to a strobe, lasting much longer than a single Vagabond II, with a slightly slower recycle time, and weighing in at about half the weight.

It's not unreasonable for a Vagabond II to go for $375 or higher (used). Three VML's would be ~$720. So given a three light setup.. at just under twice the price, you get better performance (3 dedicated VML vs 1VII), much longer lasting power, and still coming in about 50% of the weight of the Vagabond II.

If you do enough outdoor work, an extra $375 for longer/faster/lighter would definitely be worth the money (IMO).

It's not a 1:1 comparison where the VML shines performance-wise, but its ability to scale at an affordable price makes it very useful.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jaycky
Goldmember
jaycky's Avatar
2,089 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Bancouver okanagan alberta
Apr 02, 2011 13:20 |  #32

eduardofrances wrote in post #12143188external link
By reading Rob Galbraith´s article about the mini and looking on how it performs (worst than every other option including the Vagabond II if you look at the tables with the recycle times ) I don´t think it is really what I would choose for location power even if its main feature is a smaller size and weight. I would go with a Vagabond II, LP 750 or Innovatronix Explorer XT than with a Mini.

Are you serious bulky arm breaking weight compared to this small pack of cigs?
Watch this video they do not lie

http://vimeo.com/19073​905external link


i will be picking up more in the near future no doubt about this!


5DM2 /grip Lots Of L's
measurbating f-stops
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/52633882@N07/external link
http://about.me/jbmpho​tosexternal link
http://photobyfish.tum​blr.com/archiveexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
eduardofrances
Senior Member
679 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Apr 02, 2011 13:37 |  #33

BrandonSi wrote in post #12143908external link
There are trade-offs with everything.. Money aside, I'd rather have three mini's, each dedicated to a strobe, lasting much longer than a single Vagabond II, with a slightly slower recycle time, and weighing in at about half the weight.

It's not unreasonable for a Vagabond II to go for $375 or higher (used). Three VML's would be ~$720. So given a three light setup.. at just under twice the price, you get better performance (3 dedicated VML vs 1VII), much longer lasting power, and still coming in about 50% of the weight of the Vagabond II.

If you do enough outdoor work, an extra $375 for longer/faster/lighter would definitely be worth the money (IMO).

It's not a 1:1 comparison where the VML shines performance-wise, but its ability to scale at an affordable price makes it very useful.

It is a subjective choice of course, I value recycle time a lot and the mini in those tests almost doubled the recycled time of what the rest of the tested units did, but different choices will be made based on different priorities :)


http://flickr.com/phot​os/eduardofrances/external link :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
eduardofrances
Senior Member
679 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Apr 02, 2011 13:42 |  #34

jaycky wrote in post #12144420 (external link)
Are you serious bulky arm breaking weight compared to this small pack of cigs?
Watch this video they do not lie

http://vimeo.com/19073​905 (external link)


i will be picking up more in the near future no doubt about this!

Well that´s why gear bags have wheels, to tell you the truth I have never seen the weight of gear as an issue, because I have been used to heavy gear all my life (and it is good exercise too).

My problem with the mini vs the rest of offers is these times:
(from Rob Galbraith tests)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.robgalbrait​h.com ...formance_table_mast​er.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Six seconds with 2 monolights is kinda too much, 9 is beyond too much, but my priorities are subjective of course and everyone can choose what they need based on their priorities. I

http://flickr.com/phot​os/eduardofrances/external link :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyee
Senior Member
981 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Boston, PRofMA
Apr 02, 2011 14:08 |  #35

eduardofrances wrote in post #12144498external link
Six seconds with 2 monolights is kinda too much, 9 is beyond too much, but my priorities are subjective of course and everyone can choose what they need based on their priorities. I

AFAIK, the model for this was Bacilonur's pelican pack. He dedicated one per strobe...it was a cool concept at the time and I tried building one too. The VB mini's are meant to be used that way IIRC, and not for WL3200's or Zeus or 2400WS packs either (though they tested with it)...just a 640WS Einstein or smaller.

You can plug more stuff into it and suffer the slow recycle times to save your wallet, but beware that wasn't the intended design use case...or get a VBII w/ the bigger inverter which is needed for fast recycle times w/ high power heads/packs...


Pentax K20D, 77Ltd, 43Ltd, Sigma 17-70, 60-250/4, crapload of Strobist gear (SB28's, RP JrX Studios, Einsteins, WL, Speedo BD, softboxes, grids, etc.)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
ben_r_'s Avatar
15,875 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Sacramento, CA
Apr 02, 2011 23:26 |  #36

So far for my uses I have noticed next to no differences in performance between my old VBA and my new VML when used with an Elinchrom 600RX. But maybe its my shooting style or just the way I use it? Either way, Im glad I sold the VB2 and move to the VML. I have a second VML on order in fact. Its great to pack so light.


[Gear List | Flickrexternal link | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protectionexternal link /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Schell
Senior Member
John Schell's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Los Angeles, California
Apr 03, 2011 11:42 |  #37

It's not unreasonable for a Vagabond II to go for $375 or higher (used).

Just wanted to point out that that isn't exactly correct. They go for 270 to just under 300 used. I bought and sold one and watched as the 270-280 ones would sell in seconds while the 300+ dollar ones would sit for days.


Websiteexternal link || Instagramexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
k.CHU
Goldmember
1,115 posts
Joined Mar 2008
City of Angels
Apr 03, 2011 13:12 |  #38

jtschell wrote in post #12149040external link
Just wanted to point out that that isn't exactly correct. They go for 270 to just under 300 used. I bought and sold one and watched as the 270-280 ones would sell in seconds while the 300+ dollar ones would sit for days.


Until you look at ebay haha, past 3 weeks ive been watching, all of the v2's sold for 350+ used.


Kevin Chu Photographyexternal link
Canon 5DII | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | B800(x3)
Flickrexternal link (Jan 2011) | Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tetrode
I am a walking repository of thoroughly useless information
tetrode's Avatar
3,774 posts
Joined Jan 2006
New York
Apr 03, 2011 13:29 as a reply to k.CHU's post |  #39

Vagabond lust has driven some to lose all sense of reason:

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5306/5586128814_500ce946b2_o.jpg

Dave F.



LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
ben_r_'s Avatar
15,875 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Sacramento, CA
Apr 03, 2011 23:55 |  #40

Dang, should have sold mine on ebay.


[Gear List | Flickrexternal link | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protectionexternal link /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
BrandonSi's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
Chicago
Apr 04, 2011 07:56 |  #41

jtschell wrote in post #12149040external link
Just wanted to point out that that isn't exactly correct. They go for 270 to just under 300 used. I bought and sold one and watched as the 270-280 ones would sell in seconds while the 300+ dollar ones would sit for days.

I was looking at eBay prices.. I guess you can always get a deal from those who will take less than market value in order to avoid eBay and associated fees / hassles.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
17,580 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Apr 04, 2011 08:41 |  #42

ben_r_ wrote in post #12152616external link
Dang, should have sold mine on ebay.

same here.

I do love my mini. Ordered one more for the 2nd light for on the go shoots. I hate running cables from one light to the other. To Eduardo, he must be shooting indoors (even though he says location), then wheels work and weight is not much an issue but when shooting say seniors or 1-2 person shots onthe go like engagements, weddings etc. where assistant holding a light pole with one light, mini is awesome setup and much better than two speedlites with external packs.


5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Schell
Senior Member
John Schell's Avatar
800 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Los Angeles, California
Apr 04, 2011 09:01 |  #43

k.CHU wrote in post #12149476external link
Until you look at ebay haha, past 3 weeks ive been watching, all of the v2's sold for 350+ used.

Well that's just... annoying!


Websiteexternal link || Instagramexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Village_Idiot's Avatar
3,686 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Durt Burg, WV
Apr 04, 2011 09:07 |  #44

How would the mini do supporting a 1200w/s pack?


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyee
Senior Member
981 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Boston, PRofMA
Apr 04, 2011 09:50 |  #45

Village_Idiot wrote in post #12154257external link
How would the mini do supporting a 1200w/s pack?

Unless you like shooting slow, don't do it. You need a bigger inverter. Look at the chart above for VBII vs. mini and 2 640WS lights...


Pentax K20D, 77Ltd, 43Ltd, Sigma 17-70, 60-250/4, crapload of Strobist gear (SB28's, RP JrX Studios, Einsteins, WL, Speedo BD, softboxes, grids, etc.)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

5,038 views & 0 likes for this thread
Vagabond II or Mini ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00136 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is muddywaters03
1084 guests, 612 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016