LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Vagabond II or Mini ?

FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting
Thread started 27 Mar 2011 (Sunday) 21:52   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
BrandonSi
Goldmember
BrandonSi's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
4,882 posts
Chicago
[MORE/SHARE]

eduardofrances wrote in post #12143188external link
By reading Rob Galbraith´s article about the mini and looking on how it performs (worst than every other option including the Vagabond II if you look at the tables with the recycle times ) I don´t think it is really what I would choose for location power even if its main feature is a smaller size and weight. I would go with a Vagabond II, LP 750 or Innovatronix Explorer XT than with a Mini.

There are trade-offs with everything.. Money aside, I'd rather have three mini's, each dedicated to a strobe, lasting much longer than a single Vagabond II, with a slightly slower recycle time, and weighing in at about half the weight.

It's not unreasonable for a Vagabond II to go for $375 or higher (used). Three VML's would be ~$720. So given a three light setup.. at just under twice the price, you get better performance (3 dedicated VML vs 1VII), much longer lasting power, and still coming in about 50% of the weight of the Vagabond II.

If you do enough outdoor work, an extra $375 for longer/faster/lighter would definitely be worth the money (IMO).

It's not a 1:1 comparison where the VML shines performance-wise, but its ability to scale at an affordable price makes it very useful.

Post #31, Apr 02, 2011 11:00:11


[ wwwexternal link·flickrexternal link]

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jaycky
Goldmember
jaycky's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
2,089 posts
Bancouver okanagan alberta
[MORE/SHARE]

eduardofrances wrote in post #12143188external link
By reading Rob Galbraith´s article about the mini and looking on how it performs (worst than every other option including the Vagabond II if you look at the tables with the recycle times ) I don´t think it is really what I would choose for location power even if its main feature is a smaller size and weight. I would go with a Vagabond II, LP 750 or Innovatronix Explorer XT than with a Mini.

Are you serious bulky arm breaking weight compared to this small pack of cigs?
Watch this video they do not lie

http://vimeo.com/19073​905external link


i will be picking up more in the near future no doubt about this!

Post #32, Apr 02, 2011 13:20:54


5DM2 /grip Lots Of L's
measurbating f-stops
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/52633882@N07/external link
http://about.me/jbmpho​tosexternal link
http://photobyfish.tum​blr.com/archiveexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
eduardofrances
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
679 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

BrandonSi wrote in post #12143908external link
There are trade-offs with everything.. Money aside, I'd rather have three mini's, each dedicated to a strobe, lasting much longer than a single Vagabond II, with a slightly slower recycle time, and weighing in at about half the weight.

It's not unreasonable for a Vagabond II to go for $375 or higher (used). Three VML's would be ~$720. So given a three light setup.. at just under twice the price, you get better performance (3 dedicated VML vs 1VII), much longer lasting power, and still coming in about 50% of the weight of the Vagabond II.

If you do enough outdoor work, an extra $375 for longer/faster/lighter would definitely be worth the money (IMO).

It's not a 1:1 comparison where the VML shines performance-wise, but its ability to scale at an affordable price makes it very useful.

It is a subjective choice of course, I value recycle time a lot and the mini in those tests almost doubled the recycled time of what the rest of the tested units did, but different choices will be made based on different priorities :)

Post #33, Apr 02, 2011 13:37:11


http://flickr.com/phot​os/eduardofrances/external link :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
eduardofrances
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
679 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

jaycky wrote in post #12144420external link
Are you serious bulky arm breaking weight compared to this small pack of cigs?
Watch this video they do not lie

http://vimeo.com/19073​905external link


i will be picking up more in the near future no doubt about this!

Well that´s why gear bags have wheels, to tell you the truth I have never seen the weight of gear as an issue, because I have been used to heavy gear all my life (and it is good exercise too).

My problem with the mini vs the rest of offers is these times:
(from Rob Galbraith tests)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.robgalbrait​h.com ...formance_table_mast​er.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Six seconds with 2 monolights is kinda too much, 9 is beyond too much, but my priorities are subjective of course and everyone can choose what they need based on their priorities. I

Post #34, Apr 02, 2011 13:42:27


http://flickr.com/phot​os/eduardofrances/external link :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyee
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2009
981 posts
Boston, PRofMA
[MORE/SHARE]

eduardofrances wrote in post #12144498external link
Six seconds with 2 monolights is kinda too much, 9 is beyond too much, but my priorities are subjective of course and everyone can choose what they need based on their priorities. I

AFAIK, the model for this was Bacilonur's pelican pack. He dedicated one per strobe...it was a cool concept at the time and I tried building one too. The VB mini's are meant to be used that way IIRC, and not for WL3200's or Zeus or 2400WS packs either (though they tested with it)...just a 640WS Einstein or smaller.

You can plug more stuff into it and suffer the slow recycle times to save your wallet, but beware that wasn't the intended design use case...or get a VBII w/ the bigger inverter which is needed for fast recycle times w/ high power heads/packs...

Post #35, Apr 02, 2011 14:08:35


Pentax K20D, 77Ltd, 43Ltd, Sigma 17-70, 60-250/4, crapload of Strobist gear (SB28's, RP JrX Studios, Einsteins, WL, Speedo BD, softboxes, grids, etc.)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
ben_r_'s Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
15,821 posts
Sacramento, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

So far for my uses I have noticed next to no differences in performance between my old VBA and my new VML when used with an Elinchrom 600RX. But maybe its my shooting style or just the way I use it? Either way, Im glad I sold the VB2 and move to the VML. I have a second VML on order in fact. Its great to pack so light.

Post #36, Apr 02, 2011 23:26:59


[Gear List | Flickrexternal link | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Schell
Senior Member
John Schell's Avatar
Joined Apr 2010
794 posts
San Diego, California
[MORE/SHARE]

It's not unreasonable for a Vagabond II to go for $375 or higher (used).

Just wanted to point out that that isn't exactly correct. They go for 270 to just under 300 used. I bought and sold one and watched as the 270-280 ones would sell in seconds while the 300+ dollar ones would sit for days.

Post #37, Apr 03, 2011 11:42:59


Websiteexternal link || Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
k.CHU
Goldmember
Joined Mar 2008
1,113 posts
City of Angels
[MORE/SHARE]

jtschell wrote in post #12149040external link
Just wanted to point out that that isn't exactly correct. They go for 270 to just under 300 used. I bought and sold one and watched as the 270-280 ones would sell in seconds while the 300+ dollar ones would sit for days.


Until you look at ebay haha, past 3 weeks ive been watching, all of the v2's sold for 350+ used.

Post #38, Apr 03, 2011 13:12:19


Kevin Chu Photographyexternal link
Canon 5DII | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | B800(x3)
Flickrexternal link (Jan 2011) | Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tetrode
I am a walking repository of thoroughly useless information
tetrode's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
3,769 posts
New York
[MORE/SHARE]

Vagabond lust has driven some to lose all sense of reason:

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5306/5586128814_500ce946b2_o.jpg

Dave F.

Post #39, Apr 03, 2011 13:29:58 as a reply to k.CHU's post 17 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
ben_r_'s Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
15,821 posts
Sacramento, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Dang, should have sold mine on ebay.

Post #40, Apr 03, 2011 23:55:24


[Gear List | Flickrexternal link | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Goldmember
BrandonSi's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
4,882 posts
Chicago
[MORE/SHARE]

jtschell wrote in post #12149040external link
Just wanted to point out that that isn't exactly correct. They go for 270 to just under 300 used. I bought and sold one and watched as the 270-280 ones would sell in seconds while the 300+ dollar ones would sit for days.

I was looking at eBay prices.. I guess you can always get a deal from those who will take less than market value in order to avoid eBay and associated fees / hassles.

Post #41, Apr 04, 2011 07:56:51


[ wwwexternal link·flickrexternal link]

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2007
16,610 posts
Bay Area, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

ben_r_ wrote in post #12152616external link
Dang, should have sold mine on ebay.

same here.

I do love my mini. Ordered one more for the 2nd light for on the go shoots. I hate running cables from one light to the other. To Eduardo, he must be shooting indoors (even though he says location), then wheels work and weight is not much an issue but when shooting say seniors or 1-2 person shots onthe go like engagements, weddings etc. where assistant holding a light pole with one light, mini is awesome setup and much better than two speedlites with external packs.

Post #42, Apr 04, 2011 08:41:43


5dmk3, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Schell
Senior Member
John Schell's Avatar
Joined Apr 2010
794 posts
San Diego, California
[MORE/SHARE]

k.CHU wrote in post #12149476external link
Until you look at ebay haha, past 3 weeks ive been watching, all of the v2's sold for 350+ used.

Well that's just... annoying!

Post #43, Apr 04, 2011 09:01:17


Websiteexternal link || Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Village_Idiot's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
3,585 posts
Durt Burg, WV
[MORE/SHARE]

How would the mini do supporting a 1200w/s pack?

Post #44, Apr 04, 2011 09:07:05


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyee
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2009
981 posts
Boston, PRofMA
[MORE/SHARE]

Village_Idiot wrote in post #12154257external link
How would the mini do supporting a 1200w/s pack?

Unless you like shooting slow, don't do it. You need a bigger inverter. Look at the chart above for VBII vs. mini and 2 640WS lights...

Post #45, Apr 04, 2011 09:50:56


Pentax K20D, 77Ltd, 43Ltd, Sigma 17-70, 60-250/4, crapload of Strobist gear (SB28's, RP JrX Studios, Einsteins, WL, Speedo BD, softboxes, grids, etc.)

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,302 views & 0 likes for this thread
Vagabond II or Mini ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00262 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
868 guests, 564 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is ozaero

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.