Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #1
Marloon
Goldmember
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 4,323
Default Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Disclaimer: PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THIS IS NOT A SCIENTIFIC TEST! THE FOLLOWING ARE JPEG OUTPUTS FROM THE MENTIONED CAMERAS AS THE X100 RAW FILES ARE NOT YET SUPPORTED BY ADOBE LR AND CS5. RAW PHOTOS WILL BE POSTED ONCE ACR IS RELEASED.

ORIGINAL IMAGE




ISO 200


ISO 400


ISO 800


ISO 1600


ISO 3200


ISO 6400



My notes:
- The buffer on the X100 is definitely horrible. I am using a class 4 SDHC card (15mb/s | 16gb) and it takes the camera 7 seconds to store the ONE raw + ONE large jpeg file onto the card. I am still able to take photos however, the buffer freezes the camera up and prevents me from changing ANY settings. This has become an issue in the field. A faster card is on it's way (45mb/s | 16gb) and that supposedly lowers the time down to 2 seconds - which is faster, but is still a slouch.
- The 7D and the 5D are definitely a lot faster with bigger buffers and of course, I didn't experience any slowdowns - which is of course expected.
- The X100 does have a significant amount of in-camera sharpening when it outputs jpegs but all of the settings were set to it's standard.
- It appears to me that the X100 does not have chroma noise but it's more grain like in comparison to the other cameras.
- After looking at these files for about an hour, I still don't know how many stops of advantage in terms of noise you'd get from an X100 compared to the 7D - to me, it looks like one stop.
- Oddly enough, the white grate behind the light stand starts to disappear ISO 3200 on the Fuji X100 and detail is lost by ISO 6400

I hope that you've enjoyed this test as much as I have. It's definitely feels nice to have a pocketable, lightweight that offers high image quality - one that you don't have to worry about/that is comparable to something like a 7D/5D, and has both manual and automatic features. I hope that Fujifilm will continue to develop this lineup - one that offers interchangeable lenses as there definitely is a market potential for these types of cameras.
__________________
I'm MARLON
Former Canon Platinum CPS member
5DII 24L 35L 50L 85L 135L 200LIS

Last edited by Marloon : 7th of April 2011 (Thu) at 00:55. Reason: 04/06/11 Corrected 7D title
Marloon is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #2
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
 
jwcdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 11,952
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Interesting indeed. First off. Thank you. A very gracious thank you for going through the trouble of doing this. Secondly, I think you mislabeled the image. I gather the right-most image is the 7D/24L/f4. You mislabeled it as the 5D2.

Since I have no qualitative way to measure ISO level, I can't comment on whether it's actually better or worse. My eyes see more of the lightstand in the cropped image due to the 12mp resolution, so my mind tells me there's more contrast (but I also wonder what my mind would think if the 5d2/7d images were downsized to the 12mp resolution, or the x100 uprez'd).

You do point out an interesting thing happening, with regards to the closet rack disappearing at iso6400. I suspect the Fuji has additional contrast/sharpening at work here. Since my understanding is that the 5D2 is pretty darn sharp at the pixel-level, yet it looks terribly soft (as the 7D) compared to X100 image. It's either that or both the 35L and 24L are inferior to the lens on the Fuji (which is a possibility).
__________________
Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug | Blog
My Review | "The Mighty One"
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

Last edited by jwcdds : 7th of April 2011 (Thu) at 00:54.
jwcdds is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #3
ICBuyer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 163
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

well, the focus on the right most image is off.
__________________
I'm so lost

I have: 7D, 50mm F1.4, 24-70L, 70-200L F4 IS, 430EXII
ICBuyer is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #4
Marloon
Goldmember
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 4,323
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwcdds View Post
Interesting indeed. First off. Thank you. A very gracious thank you for going through the trouble of doing this. Secondly, I think you mislabeled the image. I gather the right-most image is the 7D/24L/f4. You mislabeled it as the 5D2.
You are most welcome. It took me about an hour and a half to complete testing, cropping, compiling and posting. Phew! Thank you for pointing out that I've mislabeled one of the images - that has now been corrected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwcdds View Post
Since I have no qualitative way to measure ISO level, I can't comment on whether it's actually better or worse. My eyes see more of the lightstand in the cropped image due to the 12mp resolution, so my mind tells me there's more contrast (but I also wonder what my mind would think if the 5d2/7d images were downsized to the 12mp resolution, or the x100 uprez'd).
That's a possible request that can happen. Since I can't really make NEW pixels, I will downrez the other files. That'll have to wait though, I have to study for my finals (it'll end on the 8th of April)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwcdds View Post
You do point out an interesting thing happening, with regards to the closet rack disappearing at iso6400. I suspect the Fuji has additional contrast/sharpening at work here. Since my understanding is that the 5D2 is pretty darn sharp at the pixel-level, yet it looks terribly soft (as the 7D) compared to X100 image. It's either that or both the 35L and 24L are inferior to the lens on the Fuji (which is a possibility).
It is rather interesting. The high resolution sensors on both the 5D and the 7D push the 24L and the 35L to it's maximum resolving potential.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBuyer View Post
well, the focus on the right most image is off.
As for the focusing, I HAD to make sure that I was focusing properly. I let the camera focus itself and then adjusted using live-view at 10X. I switched the lens to MF mode, and left it at that as I kept pushing the iso and the shutter to keep the focus consistent.

I evaluated the DOF using the DOF calculator. The subject was 1.5 m away. The 7D was set with a 24mm FL and a f/4.0 Aperture.

Depth of field
Near limit 1.26 m
Far limit 1.86 m
Total 0.61 m


In front of subject 0.24 m (40%)
Behind subject 0.36 m (60%)

Hyperfocal distance 7.6 m

So I am pretty sure that I am fine in this aspect.
__________________
I'm MARLON
Former Canon Platinum CPS member
5DII 24L 35L 50L 85L 135L 200LIS

Last edited by Marloon : 7th of April 2011 (Thu) at 01:11.
Marloon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #5
arentol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marloon View Post
That's a possible request that can happen. Since I can't really make NEW pixels, I will downrez the other files. That'll have to wait though, I have to study for my finals (it'll end on the 8th of April)
I would upsize the X100 (a lot) and the 7D (a little), to match them to the 5d2. This is the only fair way to do it because you are comparing cameras here, and penalizing a camera for being better at something (more MP) is completely contrary to the goal of the test. Since the X100 provides the least MP it should have to raise itself to the level of the camera that provides the most.
__________________
5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto.com/
*****Lenses For Sale*****
arentol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #6
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
 
jwcdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 11,952
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by arentol View Post
I would upsize the X100 (a lot) and the 7D (a little), to match them to the 5d2. This is the only fair way to do it because you are comparing cameras here, and penalizing a camera for being better at something (more MP) is completely contrary to the goal of the test. Since the X100 provides the least MP it should have to raise itself to the level of the camera that provides the most.
But on the flip side, downsizing the files from the 5D2 & 7D will offer great improvement on actual noise level of the image itself. The comparison was originally triggered by a discussion of ISO/noise performance between the 3. Up-sizing the x100 will expose the loss of detail (as expected). Down-sizing the 5D2/7D files will reduce the perceived noise in the overall image.
__________________
Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug | Blog
My Review | "The Mighty One"
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)
jwcdds is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #7
Stamp
Member
 
Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SO Indiana
Posts: 667
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Thanks for the test, Marlon.

Why does it matter that there is no aftermarket RAW support for the x100? Surely it came with Fuji RAW converter, right? Why aren't we taking RAW images, and simply converting them with no PP'ing? And no, smarty pants, I don't consider converting PP'ing, so keep your trap shut
__________________
1Ds Mark II, 5D Mark III, Canon AE1, Yashica Electro 35, Mamiya RB67, Yashica 124, some lenses with red rings on them, and some flashey things

- My Site -
- Like It On Facebook -
Stamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #8
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
 
bohdank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 14,060
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Different RAW converters will give different results. Ideally you want to use the same software for all the images.
__________________
Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer
Flickr
bohdank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #9
Stamp
Member
 
Stamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SO Indiana
Posts: 667
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bohdank View Post
Different RAW converters will give different results. Ideally you want to use the same software for all the images.
Didn't know that. I figured if no setting were tweaked, and the were just converted, they'd be relatively the same.
__________________
1Ds Mark II, 5D Mark III, Canon AE1, Yashica Electro 35, Mamiya RB67, Yashica 124, some lenses with red rings on them, and some flashey things

- My Site -
- Like It On Facebook -
Stamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #10
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
 
bohdank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 14,060
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Different software, different algorithms used in converting RAW to something useable.
__________________
Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer
Flickr
bohdank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #11
JBF
Senior Member
 
JBF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,483
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

The Fuji looks to me that it has in camera sharpening on. It (fuji) looks to me to win the high ISO test.
__________________
JBF
Canon 7D, Canon 1D Mark IV, Canon 24-105L f/4, Canon 35L 1.4, Canon 200L f/2.8, Canon 70-200L II IS f/2.8, Canon 300L f/2.8IS, 580ex Flash, 430ex Flash, 1.4X Converter. Bunch of other crap! I want the new 500mmL and the 200L f/2.0
JBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #12
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
 
davidfig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
Posts: 3,163
Thumbs up Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBF View Post
The Fuji looks to me that it has in camera sharpening on. It (fuji) looks to me to win the high ISO test.
That's what it looks like. Can't wait for the all the fanboys to tear this apart.

Background grate aside, this looks pretty amazing considering a $1000 camera is pitted against a $3000(7D) and $4000(5Dii) setup. But that will be lost on everyone.

Would be nice if the OP would comment on white balance.
__________________
5D | (2) 550EX | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sigma 18-125 | (4)AB B400 | Load of Pentax M42's
davidfig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #13
eelnoraa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,596
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

I think focus is fine. Today's high pixel count SLR always give a little soft image at pixel leve if no sharpening applied. To me, 5Dii is only on par with X100, or sligtly ahead (at most) up to ISO1600. Beyond that, X100 is noticeable better. The noise charasteristic of the x100 is also better than that of the 5Dii. The pattern seems finer, less blotchiness. And both are better than 7D.

Yes, I agree, in term of low light performance, X100 wins here. Again, Canon is really losing ground in low noise department. I am just so disappointed at Canon for making so little improvement to its sensor compared to there camera makers.
__________________
5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

Last edited by eelnoraa : 7th of April 2011 (Thu) at 10:30.
eelnoraa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #14
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
 
yourdoinitwrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,394
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

The results from the X100 at 1600 and above are very impressive for sure. I'm still happy with my 7D but it's interesting to see what can be accomplished with an APS-C sensor. Hopefully ACR will bring out support for the X100 soon so we can see the RAW comparison.
__________________
7D (x2) w/ BG-E7, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8
Full List
yourdoinitwrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #15
Marloon
Goldmember
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 4,323
Default Re: Canon 5D Mark II Vs. Canon 7D Vs. Fujifilm X100 - 100% Crops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfig View Post
That's what it looks like. Can't wait for the all the fanboys to tear this apart.

Background grate aside, this looks pretty amazing considering a $1000 camera is pitted against a $3000(7D) and $4000(5Dii) setup. But that will be lost on everyone.

Would be nice if the OP would comment on white balance.
To give you the straight answer, the AWB on the X100 is fantastic! Under mixed lighting, the can pick out the perfect WB setting. To make sure that I wasn't delusional, I went over to AlanU's house so that he, too, can play with the X100. Here's what he had to say about AWB (and more) - I swiped this from an earlier thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanU View Post
For my style of shooting (non sports) I will have to say the x100 has better/superior ISO performance than a 7D and it completely blows away my 1dmk3 in terms of IQ, ISO performance,AWB and destroys the 1dmk3 when it comes to metering. The 1dmk3 has horrible metering for a "pro body". I just did a quick snap of my daughters using a 1dmk3 with cheap (sarcasm) 35L vs x100. The x100 metered perfectly and as far as dynamic/tonality the x100 was incredibly better. I shot ISO 2500, f4 and the noise (jpg set to low NR) is as clean as my 1dmk3 at ISO 1000-1250!! ISO 1600 in demanding light the 1dmk3 is useable hitting it hard with NR.
__________________
I'm MARLON
Former Canon Platinum CPS member
5DII 24L 35L 50L 85L 135L 200LIS
Marloon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon EOS 7D + 24L Vs. Fujifilm Finepix X100 - 100% Crops Marloon Canon EOS Digital Cameras 151 7th of June 2011 (Tue) 00:51
Fujifilm x100 vs. Canon eos 600D Marloon Canon EOS Digital Cameras 2 26th of March 2011 (Sat) 00:05
Trading 7D + 24L for the Fujifilm X100. Thoughts? Marloon Canon EOS Digital Cameras 34 14th of March 2011 (Mon) 14:26
Pretty Impressive: Canon 5D Mark II vs Fujifilm X100 vs Leica X1 Test Marloon Canon EOS Digital Cameras 4 14th of March 2011 (Mon) 09:45
Canon EOS 20D vs Fujifilm S3 Pro DreamDriven78 Canon EOS Digital Cameras 16 2nd of March 2005 (Wed) 14:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.