![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisville,Kentucky
Posts: 2
|
I've had the current 100-400L for 8 years and have been more than satisfied with it. If they could produce a MK II which is a bit sharper and has the latest generation Image Stabilization I'd gladly upgrade. Thats as long as the price isn't twice that of the current lens.
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#32 | |
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Goldmember
|
I haven't really found too much of a compromise on this either. I usually choose to leave the friction ring loosened all the way and deal with the creep so I can zoom quickly if needed. If I am shooting 400 only and don't expect to need to zoom I'll usually tighten it all the way down.
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#34 |
|
Member
|
Canon would make a mint if they upgraded this lens and did it right. New IS and sharper optics with a street price similar to the new 70-200. I would start saving my pennies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 61
|
Yeah, do away with the push/pull, I'd be in as well. Can't adjust to it, too weird. And I always felt a little pervy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 10,315
|
Quote:
__________________
Julian Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug Founding member and President of the OGUS Photo Club (Over-Geared, Under-Skilled) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
obsolete as of this post
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
Posts: 3,903
|
For what I was shooting with the 100-400, the push pull is necessary. Mostly air shows, I can't twist fast enough to zoom, much less focus if I have to do that as well for whatever reason. With push pull I can zoom and focus at the same time and very quickly pull in as the plane comes close by and then pull out as it departs. I suppose if the twist was small enough to cover the full range it would work with the newer AF systems, but when I was using it, AF was just not accurate enough for air shows.
__________________
"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired" www.longwatcher.com 1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L http://www.longwatcher.com/photoequipment.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
Source: http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/03/w...ral-breakdown/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Goldmember
|
It would be great to see a new 100-400mm with those specs. As far as the push pull goes, I can go either way.
__________________
Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/photos/crainracing/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Goldmember
|
An official announcement of 100-400 Mk II and 200-400 would go really well with a new high-resolution body at Photokina, to take advantage of the new, sharper lenses.
As well as a new UWA zoom with sharp corners and a flat front element...
__________________
http://www.imperialstudios.biz - Landscape, Travel & Fine Art Photography Phase One iQ260 and iQ280 wanted - one for long exposures, the other for high resolution. Can't offer kidneys, but willing to trade for belly fat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 567
|
When is Photokina please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Goldmember
|
__________________
http://www.imperialstudios.biz - Landscape, Travel & Fine Art Photography Phase One iQ260 and iQ280 wanted - one for long exposures, the other for high resolution. Can't offer kidneys, but willing to trade for belly fat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 8,460
|
Judging by Canon's latest offerings, this will definitely be $2800 at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,377
|
Quote:
I don't think I would pay $2800 for an upgrade though |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 567
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|