Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 29 Dec 2011 (Thursday) 19:33
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Yes my 17-55 is Sharper than my 35L...argh

 
chugger93
Goldmember
chugger93's Avatar
1,165 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2009
Clinton Twp, MI
Dec 29, 2011 19:33 |  #1

Both at 35mm, same shutter, iso and shutter on tripod. One wide open, the other at 2.8. I did this for grins and giggles because I knew my 35 wasn't performing as it should be. :oops:


MA'ing doesnt seem to be helping... would all agree with the pics?


17-55

IMAGE: http://www.thecentralword.com/misc/7D/35L/MA/1755_car.JPG


CROP
IMAGE: http://www.thecentralword.com/misc/7D/35L/MA/1755_carcrop.JPG


ORIGINAL POST EDIT WITH THIS
35L 2.8
IMAGE: http://www.thecentralword.com/misc/7D/35L/MA/35L28_car.JPG


CROP
IMAGE: http://www.thecentralword.com/misc/7D/35L/MA/35L28_carcrop.JPG


35L 1.4
IMAGE: http://www.thecentralword.com/misc/7D/35L/MA/35L_car.JPG


CROP
IMAGE: http://www.thecentralword.com/misc/7D/35L/MA/35L_carcrop.JPG

Jon | JMBPhotography
-------------
5D MK II / 5D MK III --- 24L II | 50L | 135L | Canon 85 F/1.8 | 430 EX II/Yongnou 560 Speedlites | Manfrotto 055XPROB Pro Tripod

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
chumlee
Goldmember
chumlee's Avatar
1,989 posts
Joined Sep 2010
New Jersey
Dec 29, 2011 19:35 |  #2

You should take one with the 85/1.8 just to show everyone how sharp the image could actually be. :D


Leica M3 | Contax G2 |
No, I'm not the guy from Pawn Stars...

LOG IN TO REPLY
chugger93
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
chugger93's Avatar
1,165 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2009
Clinton Twp, MI
Dec 29, 2011 19:37 |  #3

chumlee wrote in post #13617662external link
You should take one with the 85/1.8 just to show everyone how sharp the image could actually be. :D

Probably would blow them all out the water. Actually I probably should have shotten the 35L at 2.8 for comparison.


Jon | JMBPhotography
-------------
5D MK II / 5D MK III --- 24L II | 50L | 135L | Canon 85 F/1.8 | 430 EX II/Yongnou 560 Speedlites | Manfrotto 055XPROB Pro Tripod

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Dec 29, 2011 19:38 as a reply to chugger93's post |  #4

You should upgrade to the Sigma 30 F1.4 EX :D




LOG IN TO REPLY
ben805
Goldmember
1,170 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Dec 29, 2011 19:39 |  #5

not sharp enough? you are joking right? :)


5D Mark III, Samyang 14mm, 35LII, 85L II, 100L IS Macro, 24-105L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II. 580EX, AB400, AB800.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Randi
Goldmember
Randi's Avatar
1,106 posts
Joined Dec 2009
St. Louis, MO.
Dec 29, 2011 19:40 |  #6

chugger93 wrote in post #13617654external link
Both at 35mm, same shutter, iso and shutter on tripod. One wide open, the other at 2.8. I did this for grins and giggles because I knew my 35 wasn't performing as it should be. I'm quite sick of this prime at this point :oops:

Shouldn't you try them both at 2.8? Was the focus placed on the lettering?


Canon 7D | Rokinon 8mm f/3.5 | Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 | Bower 85mm f/1.4 | EF 40mm f/2.8 | EF 100mm f/2.8 L | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L | 580 EX II | Manfrotto 190XB/496RC2
flickr external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Fox
Goldmember
The Fox's Avatar
1,709 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2007
Huntington Beach, Ca
Dec 29, 2011 19:41 |  #7

Not really that much of a difference. Just increase the sharping in ACR or photoshop to 40 instead of 25.

Nick


"I work from awkwardness. By that I mean I don't arrange things. If I stand in front of something, instead of arranging it, I arrange myself" -Diane Arbus
7D Gripped x2 | 50D Gripped | 17-50mm F2.8 | 35mm F1.4 | 50mm F1.4 | 85mm F1.8 | 70-200mm F4L IS |

LOG IN TO REPLY
chugger93
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
chugger93's Avatar
1,165 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2009
Clinton Twp, MI
Dec 29, 2011 19:42 |  #8

Post updated with 2.8.....seems ok.... or just as good I guess.

Yes focus on lettering


Jon | JMBPhotography
-------------
5D MK II / 5D MK III --- 24L II | 50L | 135L | Canon 85 F/1.8 | 430 EX II/Yongnou 560 Speedlites | Manfrotto 055XPROB Pro Tripod

LOG IN TO REPLY
chugger93
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
chugger93's Avatar
1,165 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2009
Clinton Twp, MI
Dec 29, 2011 19:44 |  #9

I think shooting wide open is too risky. Focus is so hard to achieve at anything below 1.8. IMO anyways....


Jon | JMBPhotography
-------------
5D MK II / 5D MK III --- 24L II | 50L | 135L | Canon 85 F/1.8 | 430 EX II/Yongnou 560 Speedlites | Manfrotto 055XPROB Pro Tripod

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,314 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Sep 2007
Dec 29, 2011 20:03 |  #10

might be a focusing issue. have you checked for front/back focusing?


Sony A7r - A7ii - A7rii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CY 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Joined May 2011
Sydney, Australia
Dec 29, 2011 20:17 |  #11
banned

It's plenty sharp at f1.4 as is imo. Can't expect razor sharpness wide open.


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickrexternal link | My Images on Getty®‎external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lancebroad
Senior Member
lancebroad's Avatar
396 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Brisbane, AU
Dec 29, 2011 20:36 |  #12

Kind of pointless the test with different settings, anything can be sharp stopped down.


Canon 6D | Canon 7D | Canon 5D mkII | 14L MK II | 24-70L | 70-200 f/2.8L | 100-400L | 400L f/2.8 | Zenitor 15mm | 580EX II |
http://facebook.com/la​nceb.avgeekexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
absplastic's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Bay Area, CA
Dec 29, 2011 20:56 |  #13

I wouldn't expect the 35 to do noticeably better than the 17-55 when both are at 35mm and f/2.8. If you look at photozone's APS-C analysis of both of these lenses at 35mm and f/2.8, you'll see they show the 17-55 having better MTF50 both in the center and edge of the frame. It's just that good. I compared my 17-55 at 55mm f/2.8 to my 60mm f/2.8 macro, and while the macro was the clear winner, the 17-55 still surprised me with how sharp it was wide open.

It's something of a misconception that when you pay more for the L glass that you're necessarily getting the sharpest lens. It's not true for the 50/1.2 either. What you're paying the big bucks for is super fast big lens elements in a tanky package, not super sharpness. Case in point, the 60mm macro is easily the sharpest lens in my kit, and it's the cheapest (it was $390 and it's in a bag with 3 other lenses in the $1000-$1500 range, two of which are L's).


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,328 views & 0 likes for this thread
Yes my 17-55 is Sharper than my 35L...argh
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00254 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Kurt Warren
584 guests, 454 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016