LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Is the new lytro camera a gimmick?

FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News
Thread started 19 Jan 2012 (Thursday) 04:20   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
boerewors
Goldmember
boerewors's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
1,942 posts
South African living in Indonesia
[MORE/SHARE]

I had been reading about this new lytro camera that can capture images without bothering about focusing and later during PP you can refocus the images.
Is this camera merely making multiple focus bracketed images and then layering them over one another so that as you click to change the focus during PP, all youre doing is merely revealing the layer with the most contrast (in focus) area where you clicked?
If that is the case then all it is, is a bit of software in a stick. With that said however, i really wish canon would introduce focus bracketing into their firmware.
I dont recall this camera having a flash and now i think i know why :)

Post #1, Jan 19, 2012 04:20:42


The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Thalagyrt
D'OH. I need to wake up some more.
Thalagyrt's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
4,816 posts
Miami, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

Short version: No, that's not what it is. They're doing some pretty nifty light hax.

Long version: http://www.lytro.com/s​cience_insideexternal link

Really long version: http://www.lytro.com/r​enng-thesis.pdfexternal link

Post #2, Jan 19, 2012 04:50:07


James

LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
44,428 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't believe it's a gimmick, it's new technology and pretty clever. We'll have to wait and see if it gains any traction.

Post #3, Jan 19, 2012 10:24:21




LOG IN TO REPLY
Ross ­ J
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2011
147 posts
After Just Now
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

I don't want to make predictions about the Lytro specifically, but it's technology fits perfectly within media theories regarding digital imaging. The switch from film to sensor was a change from visual space to an acoustic space medium. This is an abstract concept, but it means that the destiny of the digital medium is not going to be tied to sequences or actual light itself. Focusing a camera lens is part of a mechanical sequence left over from film photography and digital will seek to overcome it. The Lytro technology has just eliminated the sequence which fits perfectly within the framework of an acoustic space medium. Bottom line: media theory was able to predict the Lytro camera technology before it even existed so this means it is probably relevant even if nobody knows exactly how relevant yet.

There will probably always be a use or want for mechanical lenses so Canon lenses should be valuable for a long time to come. However, the future of digital imaging will not be tied to mechanical sequences like lenses. Again, this is an abstract concept, but if media theories are correct then digital will eventually create images without using any light at all. It should eventually be possible to create images from acoustic space similar to how ships navigate by sonar.

Post #4, Jan 19, 2012 10:57:31 as a reply to rick_reno's post 33 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Goldmember
Martin Dixon's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
1,297 posts
Ealing
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm not sure you can hear colour.

Accoustic waves are very long and resolution could never match light images. I imagine acoustic imaging would be similar to thermal imaging - interesting but not what your human eye can see.

Post #5, Jan 19, 2012 11:02:15


flickrexternal link Editing OKexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Ross ­ J
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2011
147 posts
After Just Now
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Martin Dixon wrote in post #13731942external link
I'm not sure you can hear colour.

Accoustic waves are very long and resolution could never match light images. I imagine acoustic imaging would be similar to thermal imaging - interesting but not what your human eye can see.

10 years ago, if someone had said that it would be possible to focus an image after taking it then he would have been laughed at. But here we are today and it is possible. The way to approach media theory is to use it to tell us something that will happen before telling us exactly how it will happen.

Post #6, Jan 19, 2012 11:10:44




LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
PhotoMatte's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
1,630 posts
Go Ducks!
[MORE/SHARE]

Luckily for us photographers, even if

Ross J wrote in post #13731922external link
the destiny of the digital medium is not going to be tied to sequences or actual light itself

, there will always be a demand for photographs that are tied to actual light, since photography, by definition, "derives from the Greek φωτός (phōtos), genitive of φῶς (phōs), "light" and γραφή (graphé) "representation by means of lines" or "drawing",together meaning "drawing with light". Or so says Wikipedia :)
Failing that, there's always the trend towards retro fashion, which means all of us 35mm, SLR folks will have a niche to work in.

Post #7, Feb 12, 2012 16:58:23


the siteexternal link
the blogexternal link
Smugmugexternal link
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

LOG IN TO REPLY
brose
Senior Member
brose's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
220 posts
Tasmania
[MORE/SHARE]

Take a hole. Take a wall. You have the scene on the side of the hole opposite the wall in unmatched focus, resolution and colour. (http://www.abelardomor​ell.net ...bsc_49/cameraobsc_6​4.htmlexternal link). Put the scene on the wall through software, choosing the part of the scene you want to be the focus, and blur everything else using parameters of distance from your chosen focus/scene centre, average element size and brightness.

Yours already for a fistful of dollars in quality the Lytro will never achieve!

Neil

Post #8, Feb 12, 2012 20:16:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Scatterbrained's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
6,904 posts
Suffolk, Va
[MORE/SHARE]

Kodak should buy Lytro. Just sayin.


Right now I think Lytro is a novelty. In 5 years however, when they find a way to achieve higher resolutions (when asked about resolution the owner/inventor danced around like a politician confronted about his voting record) I think it will be a much more serious piece of tech. It's a brilliant concept however.

Post #9, Feb 12, 2012 20:35:52


VanillaImaging.comexternal link"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500pxexternal link
flickrexternal link
1xexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
dǝǝɥs ɐ ʎq pǝʞuɐds
S.Horton's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
17,808 posts
Lehigh Valley, PA
[MORE/SHARE]

Kodak would just kill it beneath a few hundred standard operating procedures.

Post #10, Feb 12, 2012 20:45:27


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.comexternal link
Want your title changed?Dream On!external link
[SIZE=2]:cool:

LOG IN TO REPLY
brose
Senior Member
brose's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
220 posts
Tasmania
[MORE/SHARE]

Scatterbrained wrote in post #13875865external link
It's a brilliant concept however.


The concept (panoptic) relies on having an infinite number of mircrolenses, all perfect, without any aberrations or distortions. If not, it relies on software trickery (as all the product samples do).

In short, it cannot do better than the physics-optics of the real world of light and materials, and so is doomed to software trickery, and pretty been there done that (as the samples demonstrate) trickery at that!

I've described above how the *concept* and the actuality is already basically in the age old concept and first explorations of photography itself. Nothing OMG futuristic in it in the least.

Neil

Post #11, Feb 12, 2012 21:52:37




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
elrey2375
Goldmember
elrey2375's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
4,408 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

brose wrote in post #13876283external link
The concept (panoptic) relies on having an infinite number of mircrolenses, all perfect, without any aberrations or distortions. If not, it relies on software trickery (as all the product samples do).

In short, it cannot do better than the physics-optics of the real world of light and materials, and so is doomed to software trickery, and pretty been there done that (as the samples demonstrate) trickery at that!

I've described above how the *concept* and the actuality is already basically in the age old concept and first explorations of photography itself. Nothing OMG futuristic in it in the least.

Neil

Then where's it been all this time?

Post #12, Feb 12, 2012 23:18:45


http://emjfotografi.co​m/external link
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografiexternal link
https://www.facebook.c​om ...Fotografi/313443068​750734external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
brose
Senior Member
brose's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
220 posts
Tasmania
[MORE/SHARE]

elrey2375 wrote in post #13876684external link
Then where's it been all this time?

I dunno! Where has anything been?!:confused:

Well this much I can say: it's been a prizewinning Stanford University PhD.

I'll get one as soon as I see a "light ray". Lytro captures 11 million of them, so shouldn't be hard to find 1? If you see one before I do please get back to me asap!

Neil

Post #13, Feb 13, 2012 01:50:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
Cream of the Crop
Joined Mar 2009
15,624 posts
Issaquah, WA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

It's new tech, with some interesting potential, but right now I think it's more of an answer looking for a question than anything else.

These early models are being sold to try and help offset the costs of continued R&D and to help figure out what its real-world uses are going to be.

Post #14, Feb 13, 2012 02:00:35


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlifeexternal link (7D MkII, 7D, 40D, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Tamron 18-270 DiII PZD, 580EX II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
5,311 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

It has a lot of potential, but requires multi-gigapixel sensors and better microlens manufacturing technology to be realised.

At the moment, it's just a gimmick, but so were digital cameras 20 years ago.

Post #15, Feb 13, 2012 02:04:34




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
6,486 views & 0 likes for this thread
Is the new lytro camera a gimmick?
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00164 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1041 guests, 836 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is OceanRipple*

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.