Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 28 Jan 2012 (Saturday) 20:46
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Best Noise Reduction Software, besides Lightroom

 
jmweb
Senior Member
jmweb's Avatar
457 posts

Joined Jan 2011

PEI
MORE INFO

Looking to export a photo into a third party app to remove noise from it. Am looking for suggestions on what other software is good to use, besides lightroom.

Jan 28, 2012 20:46

I take photographs.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PhotosGuy
Moderator
PhotosGuy's Avatar
70,291 posts
GALLERY: 3 photos

Joined Feb 2004

Middle of Michigan
MORE INFO

Neat Imageexternal link

Noise Ninjaexternal link

Jan 28, 2012 22:40

FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1280 pixels on any side.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Merlin_AZ
Senior Member
Merlin_AZ's Avatar
802 posts

Joined Mar 2010
MORE INFO

Imagenomic Noiseware
Topaz DeNoise

Jan 28, 2012 23:44



LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
GregoryF's Avatar
2,289 posts

Joined Jul 2010

Magalia, CA
MORE INFO

I really like Topaz Denoise 5 as it works great for banding.

Jan 29, 2012 02:16

6D, 5D, 7D, 50D, 40D, Xsi, PENTAX mx-1, Sony a6000, Sony a3000 too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

LOG IN TO REPLY
catalyst412
Member
catalyst412's Avatar
90 posts

Joined May 2008

Southwest of Chicago, IL
MORE INFO

Imagenomic Noiseware

Jan 29, 2012 02:32 as a reply to GregoryF's post 16 minutes earlier.

7D | T1I | S100 | Sigma 17-50 2.8 | 55-250 | 60mm macro | 50 1.8 | 15-85

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Lowner's Avatar
12,924 posts

Joined Jul 2007

Salisbury, UK.
MORE INFO

Another vote for Noise Ninja.

Jan 29, 2012 04:12

Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Cream of the Crop
digital paradise's Avatar
8,294 posts
GALLERY: 9 photos

Joined Oct 2009
MORE INFO

Dfine by NIK.

Jan 29, 2012 10:27

Image Editing OK

Websiteexternal link ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
solara
Senior Member
620 posts
Joined Feb 2010
MORE INFO

Another for Dfine.

Jan 29, 2012 13:30

5D III, 7D | 17-55 f/2.8 | 16-35 f/4 | 24-105 f/4 | 85 f/1.8 | 135 f/2 | 70-200 f/4 IS | 580EX II | YN-560 | Manfrotto 190XPROB+498RC2

LOG IN TO REPLY
St. ­ Germain
Member
55 posts
Joined Nov 2006
MORE INFO

This question just came up today. I've been using Noise Ninja for years and really like it, but would definitely be willing to try something else if one of the alternatives has been proven to be superior.

Feb 28, 2012 14:02

Canon 400D | 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Kenko 1.4X | White MacBook (to match the L glass of course) ;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
7,655 posts
GALLERY: 1 photo

Joined Jun 2007

Texas USA
MORE INFO
banned

I'll second Topaz DeNoiseexternal link .

Feb 28, 2012 14:07



LOG IN TO REPLY
steunited
Member
steunited's Avatar
177 posts

Joined Aug 2006

carlisle uk
MORE INFO

do you use the noise reduction software on the raw file or after it has been converted to jpeg?

Feb 29, 2012 14:05 as a reply to Celestron's post 23 hours earlier.

5D classic,60D, 17-40 f4L, 24-105 f4L ,tamron 150-600,canon 100mm macro,speedlite 430 ex,lowepro minitrekker

LOG IN TO REPLY
dawiyo
Senior Member
321 posts
Joined Sep 2008

NoVA
MORE INFO

Topaz DeNoise works pretty well.

Feb 29, 2012 14:08

Dave
5D2 | 35L | 100L | 135L | 24-105L

LOG IN TO REPLY
garryknight
Goldmember
garryknight's Avatar
2,056 posts

Joined Mar 2008

London, UK
MORE INFO

steunited wrote in post #13991537external link
do you use the noise reduction software on the raw file or after it has been converted to jpeg?

It would be a bit pointless, IMHO, to process and convert the noise. Especially since I'd almost certainly want to sharpen the image on the way to becoming a JPEG, and I wouldn't want the noise sharpened. But maybe that's just me... :)

Feb 29, 2012 14:19

Garry Knight
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/garryknight/external link
Samsung NX2000 CSC, 20-50mm kit lens, 50-200mm OIS; Nikon D5100, AF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR, Sigma DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OS HSM, AF-S 55-200mm f/4-5.6 ED VR, AF-S 50mm f/1.8G; plus a Canon SX220 HS compact and a Galaxy Camera

LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
7,655 posts
GALLERY: 1 photo

Joined Jun 2007

Texas USA
MORE INFO
banned

To me it depends how much noise is there to begin with . If it's a lot then i DeNoise first but if it's produced while PP or very little to start with i'll DeNoise afterwards before i go to jpeg . But i always do my DeNoise either in RAW or TIF format unless it's a jpeg image to start with ;) .

Feb 29, 2012 16:23



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,393 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Noise Reduction Software, besides Lightroom
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00105 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is kimberbanger
594 guests, 651 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015