LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Canon 5D Mark III Rumors

FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 05 Feb 2010 (Friday) 23:47   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
5,338 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Not buying. It costs more than the D800 and has lower specs. Is it fully weather-sealed or not?

Waiting for an announcement of a higher-resolution model.

As it stands, the 5D2 and 1Ds3 have no real replacement among the Canon lineup. The new camera is a general-purpose model which doesn't really excel at anything.

Post #3361, Feb 22, 2012 14:19:36




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Numenorean
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2011
4,954 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Tony_Stark wrote in post #13944895external link
The 61 AF points and 6.9FPS is all I really needed to hear. The dual card slot is a bonus, but the price being $500 more than Nikon will be questionable at best.

You'd spend more than $500 converting lenses.

Post #3362, Feb 22, 2012 14:19:56


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

Tony_Stark wrote in post #13944895external link
The 61 AF points and 6.9FPS is all I really needed to hear. The dual card slot is a bonus, but the price being $500 more than Nikon will be questionable at best.

The price pretty much kills it to me

Why does it need to be $3500? Nikon is offering a similarly compelling package for less...

Post #3363, Feb 22, 2012 14:24:18


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
5Dmaniac
Goldmember
5Dmaniac's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
1,295 posts
Scottsdale, AZ
[MORE/SHARE]

Irrespective of the D800 pricing - the new 5D offers much more over the 5DII - it would make sense for it be more expensive. Let's wait until we hear it from the horse's mouth - hopefully next week.

Post #3364, Feb 22, 2012 14:26:28




LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

Numenorean wrote in post #13944900external link
You'd spend more than $500 converting lenses.

Its a trend Canon seems to be on lately, Everything they're doing as of late is MASSIVELY expensive or pandering to video shooters.... When was the last time Canon made something that wasnt a piece of **** and didnt cost over $1000? I think the 7D was the last time...

Even at a "street" price of $3199 thats a hundred less than the D800E which will kick its ass in terms of resolving power...

Given the D800 does really well at high ISO (Better than the D700 at a per pixel level... its usable at 12,800 FFS!) that is very worrying....

Post #3365, Feb 22, 2012 14:27:15


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Yohan ­ Pamudji
Goldmember
Yohan Pamudji's Avatar
Joined Jun 2007
2,992 posts
Mississippi
[MORE/SHARE]

KenjiS wrote in post #13944947external link
The price pretty much kills it to me

Why does it need to be $3500? Nikon is offering a similarly compelling package for less...

Depends what else is included in the package, but the price is a touch high when lined up against the D800. 5 more days and we'll all know the full spec sheet. Exciting times!

Post #3366, Feb 22, 2012 14:27:38




LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Todd Lambert's Avatar
Joined May 2009
12,504 posts
On The Roads Across America
[MORE/SHARE]

Hmm. Anyone else find it weird that we'd get details such as the fps, or the 100%VF, yet they can't also get the actual name?

I mean, if this was months before the release, you could argue that the name is still in flux, etc.. but with an impending launch date a week away, these things are already made, sitting in boxes with their name printed on them, etc..

To me, it seems like they don't want to get the name wrong, so they're deliberately leaving that part out, while they're making the rest up with the more acceptable understanding that the model may have been pre-release, the numbers changed slightly, etc...

I just don't think I believe this very much. Yes, the 5D3 might be around the corner, but I don't think these rumor sites have any real credible information.

Post #3367, Feb 22, 2012 14:27:53


» America By Twilight - The Ultimate Photography Roadtripexternal link

I’m now living and working full-time on-the-road across the highways of America.
Accompanied by “Montana”, a beautiful Golden Irish who goes everywhere that I do.
Follow along on this modern journey to explore America by Twilightexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

Unless there really are TWO 5D's floating around that have the same specs on paper, but one is tailored heavily towards DSLR video at the $3500 price and the other is $3000 and is lacking some things

IE, the DSLR video one, the 5DX or whatever, has the triple sampling or whatever and uncompressed HDMI whereas the 5DIII doesnt

Post #3368, Feb 22, 2012 14:29:43


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2011
4,954 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

KenjiS wrote in post #13944961external link
Its a trend Canon seems to be on lately, Everything they're doing as of late is MASSIVELY expensive or pandering to video shooters.... When was the last time Canon made something that wasnt a piece of **** and didnt cost over $1000? I think the 7D was the last time...

Even at a "street" price of $3199 thats a hundred less than the D800E which will kick its ass in terms of resolving power...

Given the D800 does really well at high ISO (Better than the D700 at a per pixel level... its usable at 12,800 FFS!) that is very worrying....

How is the D800 usable at 12,800? I've yet to see samples, what I have seen showed relatively poor performance at ISO 3200...

The 7D cost over $1000 BTW.

Post #3369, Feb 22, 2012 14:30:14


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
Goldmember
Ricku's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
1,295 posts
Bangkok
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Numenorean wrote in post #13944990external link
How is the D800 usable at 12,800? I've yet to see samples, what I have seen showed relatively poor performance at ISO 3200...

Agreed.

Btw, I don't know why I'm getting so excited already. The new 5D wont be avalible until end of summer anyway. :P

Post #3370, Feb 22, 2012 14:37:45


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
Joined Oct 2008
20,002 posts
Buffalo, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

Numenorean wrote in post #13944990external link
How is the D800 usable at 12,800? I've yet to see samples, what I have seen showed relatively poor performance at ISO 3200...

The 7D cost over $1000 BTW.

I meant lenses more specifically, but the 7D/15-85/18-135/100L announcement was the last time i think Canon actually delivered some good lenses that werent $2500....

As for the D800, here

http://nikonrumors.com ...mparison.aspx/#more​-34060external link

I'd call 3200 very usable..and 12,800 looks fantastic, Keep in mind how little a 100% crop is from a D800 and yeah, overall, 12,800 is probubly VERY usable in practice....

Post #3371, Feb 22, 2012 14:40:00


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
DigiNon
Senior Member
DigiNon's Avatar
Joined Feb 2010
885 posts
Tampa
[MORE/SHARE]

Seems like this is turning into yet another Canon vs Nikon thread.

History will repeat itself over and over. One brand will come out with the "best" camera that most people won't be able to afford anyway, then a few years later the other brand will be on top once again, and so on and so on.

Post #3372, Feb 22, 2012 14:41:21


l Mario l AE-1P l EOS 5 l 5Dc l 5DII l 17-40L l 35L l 50 1.4 l 100L l 70-200L II l

LOG IN TO REPLY
Subtas
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2010
129 posts
Portugal
[MORE/SHARE]

Well, about the price:

3500$ --> 2600€. Not too bad. :) But I don't think so...

The rest, let's just wait and see.

Post #3373, Feb 22, 2012 14:41:58


7D
5DIII
Tokina 11-16 - Canon 100 Macro - 35L - 50L - 135L
2x580EXII - 430EXII - Odin
http://500px.com/subta​sexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Buylongterm
Goldmember
Buylongterm's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
2,019 posts
Chi-town
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm excited since I want to move to a FF camera and I don't need a camera with 36+ megapixels.

However, If Canon were smart, they would price the new 5D lower than the Nikon D800. I think that price will be one of the main reasons why people jump ship especially since the D800 is packed with a ton of features. I can't see how Canon can release a camera that might not be up to par with the D800 specs, and is make it more expensive??? Doesn't make one bit of sense. But hey, what do I know? :)

Post #3374, Feb 22, 2012 14:44:28


Christian
@WerthLiving (Follow me on Instagram)
Canon 5D MK III Gripped | 35mm 1.4L | 70-200mm L 2.8 IS MK II |100mmL 2.8 Macro |
highdefjunkies.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2011
4,954 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

KenjiS wrote in post #13945049external link
I meant lenses more specifically, but the 7D/15-85/18-135/100L announcement was the last time i think Canon actually delivered some good lenses that werent $2500....

As for the D800, here

http://nikonrumors.com ...mparison.aspx/#more​-34060external link

I'd call 3200 very usable..and 12,800 looks fantastic, Keep in mind how little a 100% crop is from a D800 and yeah, overall, 12,800 is probubly VERY usable in practice....

I don't see anything there that would make it worth it for me to convert to Nikon, given the very high cost of converting all of my lenses to Nikon equivalents, and then getting 3 Nikon bodies.

Post #3375, Feb 22, 2012 14:45:37


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
455,053 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 5D Mark III Rumors
FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00714 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1191 guests, 852 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is greeman5639

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.