Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 22 Feb 2012 (Wednesday) 13:10
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

how art photography looks like.

 
krb
Cream of the Crop
krb's Avatar
8,818 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
Feb 23, 2012 20:23 |  #46

BaghdadFred wrote in post #13949484external link
So this school teaches good photographers to how to create ****ty crooked uninspired snap shots with people cut off?

http://www.itf.cz ...tr_hasal/g2004-nahled.jpgexternal link

Funny thing is that the series that includes that shot is the only one in the OP that appeals to me at all. The pics remind me of Magritte's "Son of Man", the painting of the business man with an apple in front of his face. We don't need to see their faces or even their upper bodies because they are just generic tourists in tourist places doing tourist things.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickrexternal link
Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sjones
Goldmember
sjones's Avatar
2,098 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Asheville, NC
Feb 23, 2012 20:33 |  #47

shniks wrote in post #13955013external link
200 years from now they will be calling Harry Potter a classic. Wasnt the hobbit a children's book? They now consider it to be a literary classic. Weren't the beatles a pop group?...

Not all that is successful is bad, but units sold is not an accurate measure of quality. Really, do we need to list the absolute muck and horror that was (or is) nevertheless popular?

Formulaic vapidity might not always be synonymous with the mainstream, but neither is it always antithetical…sometimes​, they're best buddies.


Jan-June 2015 Asheville & Philadelphia (external link)
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link) | Photography & Art (external link) | Art Sucks (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
33,527 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Joined May 2007
Oak Park, Illinois
Feb 23, 2012 20:33 |  #48

krb wrote in post #13955126external link
Funny thing is that the series that includes that shot is the only one in the OP that appeals to me at all. The pics remind me of Magritte's "Son of Man", the painting of the business man with an apple in front of his face. We don't need to see their faces or even their upper bodies because they are just generic tourists in tourist places doing tourist things.

I to think those are interesting in the fact your mind fills in any face that you imagine and its very typical of those kinda family travel snapshots. I'm sure its part of a large series and these people which look to be the same in all the images, their faces are not important because they could be anyone. Its actually kind of funny to see the photographer took a very snap shot approach. It kinda reminds me of the work of Bill Owens or William Eggleston in the fact it is kinda showing middle class, suburban society in a snap shot kinda way. That approach fits the tone and the message well I think.




LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
33,527 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Joined May 2007
Oak Park, Illinois
Feb 23, 2012 20:35 |  #49

sjones wrote in post #13955210external link
Not all that is successful is bad, but units sold is not an accurate measure of quality. Really, do we need to list the absolute muck and horror that was (or is) nevertheless popular?

Formulaic vapidity might not always be synonymous with the mainstream, but neither is it always antithetical…sometimes​, they're best buddies.

Exactly and remember that Van Gogh never sold a painting in his lifetime and Weston lived a very humble existence.




LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
jra's Avatar
6,453 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Ohio
Feb 23, 2012 23:25 |  #50

I find this overall discussion very difficult. On one hand, we basically have one individual trying to dictate what is good art and what isn't to everyone else. On the other hand, what is good art and what isn't ultimately lies within the viewer and creator.....and yet on the other hand, art isn't completely subjective.....there are certain measures that will hold one artist higher than another. IMO, it all must play together in an effort to create an overall experience.
In fine art, so much value seems to be put upon the name.......simply owning an original piece created by a certain well known name would skyrocket it's value regardless of its artistic merit.
For myself, great artwork is far more of an opinion and feeling than a fact.


Jason
www.secondglimpse.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisSearle
Senior Member
ChrisSearle's Avatar
352 posts
Joined Nov 2007
My time is divided between Totnes, UK, Mumbai, India and The Ardeche region of Southern France..
Feb 24, 2012 00:43 as a reply to jra's post |  #51

There seem to be quite a few people here with strong opinions about 'what art is'.... It all seems a bit 'Daily Mail' to me. People have been arguing about what art is and what makes good art since the dawn of time and by people I don't mean just academics. One thing is clear though and that is there is no universally agreed clear definition. Only opinion.
When I hear somebody say dogmatically that 'Art is blah blah..' I back away slowly....


Chris:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jeaunse23/external link
5D Mk iii, 1D MkiiN, 1Ds Mkii. Zeiss 21 mm Distagon, Canon 24-105 L. Sigma 150 Macro. Canon 400 L. Sigma 50 Nikkor 24 mm 1.4 Ricoh GRD3 Canon G1X Fuji X100,Sigma DP2M and a bunch of other stuff.

My Sigma DP2M blog at:http://chrissearlesdp2​m.blogspot.in/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
BaghdadFred
Senior Member
871 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Baghdad Iraq
Feb 24, 2012 00:56 |  #52

krb wrote in post #13955126external link
Funny thing is that the series that includes that shot is the only one in the OP that appeals to me at all. The pics remind me of Magritte's "Son of Man", the painting of the business man with an apple in front of his face. We don't need to see their faces or even their upper bodies because they are just generic tourists in tourist places doing tourist things.

I've seen quite a few of the photo streams of some of the active members of POTN and I would rate many of them as Very Good to Outstanding work. This stuff I just don't get. I don't sport a goatee, but my shaved head is somewhat hipster :lol:

Would you have been satisfied to have taken this shot?

My next crooked/missed frame shot coming soon to this thread as "Art"


Fred - Photographing everyday Military life in Iraqexternal link | SmugMugexternal link
7D | C 100-400L | Σ 70-200 2.8 OS | Σ 30 1.4 | C 10-22 | Σ 8-16 | C 17-55 2.8 IS | C 28-135 IS | 580EX II | Σ 1.4x

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrwalker
Senior Member
mrwalker's Avatar
274 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Feb 24, 2012 01:17 |  #53

De gustibus non est disputandum


Amateur, but not Destroying Photography...
Current: T2i/ 550D || EF 85mm 1.8 USM || 430EX II || Powershot SD880 IS || Manfrotto 190 from the last century || Ubuntu 10.04.4, RawTherapee and GIMP
Old: Nikon FM10 (Manual Film SLR) || Nikon E 50mm f1.8 AI || Nikkor 135mm f2.8 AI

LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
krb's Avatar
8,818 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
Feb 24, 2012 13:29 |  #54

BaghdadFred wrote in post #13956726external link
Would you have been satisfied to have taken this shot?

If I chose to do a project that consisted of "spoof" vacation photos then yes I would be satisfied with shots like this. If you cannot understand "parody" then it's best that we end this discussion now.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickrexternal link
Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,705 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Feb 24, 2012 14:01 |  #55

krb wrote in post #13959667external link
If I chose to do a project that consisted of "spoof" vacation photos then yes I would be satisfied with shots like this. If you cannot understand "parody" then it's best that we end this discussion now.

Well, do you think it was the intent of the photog of those photos to provide a "spoof", or was the intent more "serious"?

I seriously can't tell.

There are some folks here on POTN that do show some real interest in this type of subject matter, especially some "street" photographers here who have posted numerous "feet shots" and they are not "spoofy". Some compositions I find interesting, some, well, not-so-much.

So, the question is does this photographer approach the "snapshot look" tongue-in-cheek, or with a more seiously "artistic intent", or...?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
sjones's Avatar
2,098 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Asheville, NC
Feb 24, 2012 14:39 as a reply to tonylong's post |  #56

Maybe it was the photographer's intent to generate the very discussion that is taking place on this thread. Maybe it was just an ill-conceived venture into artsy pretentiousness. Or maybe it was a parody, or some type of commentary (humorous, serious, reflective…) on the vernacular. Maybe it was a sincere but debatably contrived attempt to skirt conventionality.

Whatever the reason, it was the apparent intent of the photographer to produce the photos as they are, and in this sense, it is irrelevant how any other person might feel if they had taken the same lot. And anyway, some folks on here actually like them, should that even matter to the photographer, so there's room for everything.

By the way, this is a very good example of where context can help, meaning that I don't believe that a good photo is one that should be able to stand alone. Explanations, captions, framing: all of these things can elevate the value and certainly the understanding of a photograph.


Jan-June 2015 Asheville & Philadelphia (external link)
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link) | Photography & Art (external link) | Art Sucks (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,705 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Feb 24, 2012 15:09 |  #57

sjones wrote in post #13960104external link
Maybe it was the photographer's intent to generate the very discussion that is taking place on this thread. Maybe it was just an ill-conceived venture into artsy pretentiousness. Or maybe it was a parody, or some type of commentary (humorous, serious, reflective…) on the vernacular. Maybe it was a sincere but debatably contrived attempt to skirt conventionality.

Whatever the reason, it was the apparent intent of the photographer to produce the photos as they are, and in this sense, it is irrelevant how any other person might feel if they had taken the same lot. And anyway, some folks on here actually like them, should that even matter to the photographer, so there's room for everything.

By the way, this is a very good example of where context can help, meaning that I don't believe that a good photo is one that should be able to stand alone. Explanations, captions, framing: all of these things can elevate the value and certainly the understanding of a photograph.

So, how would you apply this to the "bodiless feet/leg" series?

I'm trying to approach this thread from a thoughtful viewpoint, although hellbike (the OP) posted these links with a pretty negative commentary regarding us POTNers and our abiltiy to assess "art".

I admit, I'm no artist or art "critic", but I'm always curious to get some "real world perspective" from folks!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Goldmember
joedlh's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
Long Island, NY, North America, Sol III, Orion Spur of the Milky Way galaxy.
Feb 24, 2012 15:17 |  #58

tgamron wrote in post #13949824external link
The whole serious was pics of no faces, which was the intention of the photographer.

BRILLIANT! The fact that I never thought to do that brings home clearly and with great disappointment that I will never be an artist. :cry:

But seriously, I think all the arts are burdened with a dire need to be original and not derivative. And how can one not be derivative with millions of others plying the same craft? It's tremendously freeing to throw up one's hands in defeat and then go out and do stuff that you find meaningful without worrying about how others are going to take it.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​texternal link
Editing ok

LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
Member
Huntbear's Avatar
79 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Washington State
Feb 24, 2012 15:18 |  #59

tonylong wrote in post #13959879external link
Well, do you think it was the intent of the photog of those photos to provide a "spoof", or was the intent more "serious"?

I seriously can't tell.

There are some folks here on POTN that do show some real interest in this type of subject matter, especially some "street" photographers here who have posted numerous "feet shots" and they are not "spoofy". Some compositions I find interesting, some, well, not-so-much.

So, the question is does this photographer approach the "snapshot look" tongue-in-cheek, or with a more seiously "artistic intent", or...?


Now is when someone should point out that if this photographer had a blog, to explain what was happening, what the photographer was thinking or seeing at that moment, a lot of this talk would not be taking place. :confused:




LOG IN TO REPLY
BobOh
Goldmember
BobOh's Avatar
1,157 posts
Joined May 2006
Central Wisconsin
Feb 24, 2012 15:34 |  #60

How are we to sort out this thread? Obviously the OP, and a few others think the linked photographs are "good art". The majority seem to hold a dimmer view. There's where the OP went wrong. This thread should have been a poll. I think we all know what the results would have been. My personal opinion is the OP mixed up the "before" pictures with the "after" pictures, if you know what I mean.

Tony Long's theory that the "art" in these photos is that they are imitations of typical tourist snapshots taken with, maybe, a disposable camera, is the only theory that makes sense to me. But then, who cares? Let's all try to take the most amateurish photos we can and try to pass them off as art? We could really set "photography as art" back years.

Pfft, a total waste of time and effort. That's my vote FWIW.


Regards,
Bob
Gear: 40D, 7D, EF 100-400L, EF 28-135, Speedlight 580EX and other stuff.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bobbolew/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

16,308 views & 0 likes for this thread
how art photography looks like.
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00381 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Sebastian73
584 guests, 396 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015