Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 22 Feb 2012 (Wednesday) 13:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

how art photography looks like.

 
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Feb 23, 2012 20:23 |  #46

BaghdadFred wrote in post #13949484 (external link)
So this school teaches good photographers to how to create ****ty crooked uninspired snap shots with people cut off?

http://www.itf.cz …tr_hasal/g2004-nahled.jpg (external link)

Funny thing is that the series that includes that shot is the only one in the OP that appeals to me at all. The pics remind me of Magritte's "Son of Man", the painting of the business man with an apple in front of his face. We don't need to see their faces or even their upper bodies because they are just generic tourists in tourist places doing tourist things.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
sjones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,200 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 23, 2012 20:33 |  #47

shniks wrote in post #13955013 (external link)
200 years from now they will be calling Harry Potter a classic. Wasnt the hobbit a children's book? They now consider it to be a literary classic. Weren't the beatles a pop group?...

Not all that is successful is bad, but units sold is not an accurate measure of quality. Really, do we need to list the absolute muck and horror that was (or is) nevertheless popular?

Formulaic vapidity might not always be synonymous with the mainstream, but neither is it always antithetical…sometimes​, they're best buddies.


Summer 2017 (external link)
Eggleston's photography is superb. Deal with it!
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
35,450 posts
Gallery: 123 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4032
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Feb 23, 2012 20:33 |  #48

krb wrote in post #13955126 (external link)
Funny thing is that the series that includes that shot is the only one in the OP that appeals to me at all. The pics remind me of Magritte's "Son of Man", the painting of the business man with an apple in front of his face. We don't need to see their faces or even their upper bodies because they are just generic tourists in tourist places doing tourist things.

I to think those are interesting in the fact your mind fills in any face that you imagine and its very typical of those kinda family travel snapshots. I'm sure its part of a large series and these people which look to be the same in all the images, their faces are not important because they could be anyone. Its actually kind of funny to see the photographer took a very snap shot approach. It kinda reminds me of the work of Bill Owens or William Eggleston in the fact it is kinda showing middle class, suburban society in a snap shot kinda way. That approach fits the tone and the message well I think.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
35,450 posts
Gallery: 123 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4032
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Feb 23, 2012 20:35 |  #49

sjones wrote in post #13955210 (external link)
Not all that is successful is bad, but units sold is not an accurate measure of quality. Really, do we need to list the absolute muck and horror that was (or is) nevertheless popular?

Formulaic vapidity might not always be synonymous with the mainstream, but neither is it always antithetical…sometimes​, they're best buddies.

Exactly and remember that Van Gogh never sold a painting in his lifetime and Weston lived a very humble existence.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,521 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Feb 23, 2012 23:25 |  #50

I find this overall discussion very difficult. On one hand, we basically have one individual trying to dictate what is good art and what isn't to everyone else. On the other hand, what is good art and what isn't ultimately lies within the viewer and creator.....and yet on the other hand, art isn't completely subjective.....there are certain measures that will hold one artist higher than another. IMO, it all must play together in an effort to create an overall experience.
In fine art, so much value seems to be put upon the name.......simply owning an original piece created by a certain well known name would skyrocket it's value regardless of its artistic merit.
For myself, great artwork is far more of an opinion and feeling than a fact.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisSearle
Senior Member
Avatar
352 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
Location: My time is divided between Totnes, UK, Mumbai, India and The Ardeche region of Southern France..
     
Feb 24, 2012 00:43 as a reply to  @ jra's post |  #51

There seem to be quite a few people here with strong opinions about 'what art is'.... It all seems a bit 'Daily Mail' to me. People have been arguing about what art is and what makes good art since the dawn of time and by people I don't mean just academics. One thing is clear though and that is there is no universally agreed clear definition. Only opinion.
When I hear somebody say dogmatically that 'Art is blah blah..' I back away slowly....


Chris:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jeaunse23/ (external link)
5D Mk iii, 1D MkiiN, 1Ds Mkii. Zeiss 21 mm Distagon, Canon 24-105 L. Sigma 150 Macro. Canon 400 L. Sigma 50 Nikkor 24 mm 1.4 Ricoh GRD3 Canon G1X Fuji X100,Sigma DP2M and a bunch of other stuff.

My Sigma DP2M blog at:http://chrissearlesdp2​m.blogspot.in/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BaghdadFred
Senior Member
871 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Baghdad Iraq
     
Feb 24, 2012 00:56 |  #52

krb wrote in post #13955126 (external link)
Funny thing is that the series that includes that shot is the only one in the OP that appeals to me at all. The pics remind me of Magritte's "Son of Man", the painting of the business man with an apple in front of his face. We don't need to see their faces or even their upper bodies because they are just generic tourists in tourist places doing tourist things.

I've seen quite a few of the photo streams of some of the active members of POTN and I would rate many of them as Very Good to Outstanding work. This stuff I just don't get. I don't sport a goatee, but my shaved head is somewhat hipster :lol:

Would you have been satisfied to have taken this shot?

My next crooked/missed frame shot coming soon to this thread as "Art"


Fred - Photographing everyday Military life in Iraq (external link) | SmugMug (external link)
7D | C 100-400L | Σ 70-200 2.8 OS | Σ 30 1.4 | C 10-22 | Σ 8-16 | C 17-55 2.8 IS | C 28-135 IS | 580EX II | Σ 1.4x

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrwalker
Senior Member
Avatar
274 posts
Joined Jan 2012
     
Feb 24, 2012 01:17 |  #53

De gustibus non est disputandum


Amateur, but not Destroying Photography...
Current: T2i/ 550D || EF 85mm 1.8 USM || 430EX II || Powershot SD880 IS || Manfrotto 190 from the last century || Ubuntu 10.04.4, RawTherapee and GIMP
Old: Nikon FM10 (Manual Film SLR) || Nikon E 50mm f1.8 AI || Nikkor 135mm f2.8 AI

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Feb 24, 2012 13:29 |  #54

BaghdadFred wrote in post #13956726 (external link)
Would you have been satisfied to have taken this shot?

If I chose to do a project that consisted of "spoof" vacation photos then yes I would be satisfied with shots like this. If you cannot understand "parody" then it's best that we end this discussion now.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,637 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 24, 2012 14:01 |  #55

krb wrote in post #13959667 (external link)
If I chose to do a project that consisted of "spoof" vacation photos then yes I would be satisfied with shots like this. If you cannot understand "parody" then it's best that we end this discussion now.

Well, do you think it was the intent of the photog of those photos to provide a "spoof", or was the intent more "serious"?

I seriously can't tell.

There are some folks here on POTN that do show some real interest in this type of subject matter, especially some "street" photographers here who have posted numerous "feet shots" and they are not "spoofy". Some compositions I find interesting, some, well, not-so-much.

So, the question is does this photographer approach the "snapshot look" tongue-in-cheek, or with a more seiously "artistic intent", or...?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,200 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 24, 2012 14:39 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #56

Maybe it was the photographer's intent to generate the very discussion that is taking place on this thread. Maybe it was just an ill-conceived venture into artsy pretentiousness. Or maybe it was a parody, or some type of commentary (humorous, serious, reflective…) on the vernacular. Maybe it was a sincere but debatably contrived attempt to skirt conventionality.

Whatever the reason, it was the apparent intent of the photographer to produce the photos as they are, and in this sense, it is irrelevant how any other person might feel if they had taken the same lot. And anyway, some folks on here actually like them, should that even matter to the photographer, so there's room for everything.

By the way, this is a very good example of where context can help, meaning that I don't believe that a good photo is one that should be able to stand alone. Explanations, captions, framing: all of these things can elevate the value and certainly the understanding of a photograph.


Summer 2017 (external link)
Eggleston's photography is superb. Deal with it!
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,637 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:09 |  #57

sjones wrote in post #13960104 (external link)
Maybe it was the photographer's intent to generate the very discussion that is taking place on this thread. Maybe it was just an ill-conceived venture into artsy pretentiousness. Or maybe it was a parody, or some type of commentary (humorous, serious, reflective…) on the vernacular. Maybe it was a sincere but debatably contrived attempt to skirt conventionality.

Whatever the reason, it was the apparent intent of the photographer to produce the photos as they are, and in this sense, it is irrelevant how any other person might feel if they had taken the same lot. And anyway, some folks on here actually like them, should that even matter to the photographer, so there's room for everything.

By the way, this is a very good example of where context can help, meaning that I don't believe that a good photo is one that should be able to stand alone. Explanations, captions, framing: all of these things can elevate the value and certainly the understanding of a photograph.

So, how would you apply this to the "bodiless feet/leg" series?

I'm trying to approach this thread from a thoughtful viewpoint, although hellbike (the OP) posted these links with a pretty negative commentary regarding us POTNers and our abiltiy to assess "art".

I admit, I'm no artist or art "critic", but I'm always curious to get some "real world perspective" from folks!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,224 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 373
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:17 |  #58

tgamron wrote in post #13949824 (external link)
The whole serious was pics of no faces, which was the intention of the photographer.

BRILLIANT! The fact that I never thought to do that brings home clearly and with great disappointment that I will never be an artist. :cry:

But seriously, I think all the arts are burdened with a dire need to be original and not derivative. And how can one not be derivative with millions of others plying the same craft? It's tremendously freeing to throw up one's hands in defeat and then go out and do stuff that you find meaningful without worrying about how others are going to take it.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:18 |  #59

tonylong wrote in post #13959879 (external link)
Well, do you think it was the intent of the photog of those photos to provide a "spoof", or was the intent more "serious"?

I seriously can't tell.

There are some folks here on POTN that do show some real interest in this type of subject matter, especially some "street" photographers here who have posted numerous "feet shots" and they are not "spoofy". Some compositions I find interesting, some, well, not-so-much.

So, the question is does this photographer approach the "snapshot look" tongue-in-cheek, or with a more seiously "artistic intent", or...?


Now is when someone should point out that if this photographer had a blog, to explain what was happening, what the photographer was thinking or seeing at that moment, a lot of this talk would not be taking place. :confused:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobOh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,157 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:34 |  #60

How are we to sort out this thread? Obviously the OP, and a few others think the linked photographs are "good art". The majority seem to hold a dimmer view. There's where the OP went wrong. This thread should have been a poll. I think we all know what the results would have been. My personal opinion is the OP mixed up the "before" pictures with the "after" pictures, if you know what I mean.

Tony Long's theory that the "art" in these photos is that they are imitations of typical tourist snapshots taken with, maybe, a disposable camera, is the only theory that makes sense to me. But then, who cares? Let's all try to take the most amateurish photos we can and try to pass them off as art? We could really set "photography as art" back years.

Pfft, a total waste of time and effort. That's my vote FWIW.


Regards,
Bob
Gear: 40D, 7D, EF 100-400L, EF 28-135, Speedlight 580EX and other stuff.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bobbolew/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

23,758 views & 0 likes for this thread
how art photography looks like.
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is theposeph
742 guests, 448 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.