Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 26 Mar 2012 (Monday) 09:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Keep, Sell or Buy?

 
NJKEV
Member
77 posts
Joined Apr 2011
     
Mar 26, 2012 09:57 |  #1

I'm doing indoor and outdoor modeling shoots as well as low light concerts.

Shooting with a 60D and I'm trying to keep my set up to 3 lenses. This is what i have currently, so what should I keep, sell or buy.

My current lenses are
85mm 1.8
50mm 1.8
28-135mm
18-55mm

I really like these lenses.
Canon 50mm 1.4
Sigma 30mm 1.4
Sigma 17-50mm 2.8 OS
Canon 28mm 1.8
Tamron 70-300mm vr

Money is an issue as I can't afford L lenses yet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bpark42
Senior Member
307 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 26, 2012 10:10 |  #2

Well a good way to start answering your fairly broad question would be for you to tell us what lenses you use the most/least and what you like or dislike about them. How are your current lenses limiting you for the types of shooting you listed?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capeachy
Senior Member
427 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
     
Mar 26, 2012 10:53 |  #3

Sell the 50mm, 28-135 & 18-55 and get the 17-50. This will work as your modelling shoots indoors and out. The 85mm will work nice for head/shoulder shots.

For low light concerts, does the 85mm have enough reach? I can't see the 70-300 helping you here in low light situations.


Photography is the art of exclusion

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NJKEV
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
77 posts
Joined Apr 2011
     
Mar 26, 2012 11:15 |  #4

bpark42 wrote in post #14155516 (external link)
Well a good way to start answering your fairly broad question would be for you to tell us what lenses you use the most/least and what you like or dislike about them. How are your current lenses limiting you for the types of shooting you listed?

I mostly shoot with the 85mm and the 50mm. I love how sharp the image is compared to my other 2 zoom lenses.

As for the lenses I listed
Since I really like the 50mm 1.8 I thought I upgrade to the 1.4
Canon 28mm and the sigma 30mm, I really love how wide they are.
Tamron 70-300 vr I listed because of its reach
Sigma 17-50 OS for everything in between.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thestone11
Goldmember
Avatar
1,203 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
     
Mar 26, 2012 11:19 |  #5

There is one L lens that you may afford. 70-200 f/4 non IS


Canon 5D MK II | Fuji X100 | Canon T2i | Canon 100mm macro f/2.8 | Canon 135L f/2 | Canon 50mm f/1.2 L | 17-40mm f/4 L | 24-70mm f/2.8 L | 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM |Canon 430EX II Flash X2 | Pocketwizard TT5 & TT1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 26, 2012 11:24 |  #6

For the most part you arent going to want anything much wider than 50 for modeling shots.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonYouCan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,471 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Belgium
     
Mar 26, 2012 11:29 |  #7

Well I did almost a complete modelshoot with my 35L as had limited space with my 85L :)

On your crop I would sell all of them and buy :
Budget/quality zooms : Tamron 17-50 2.8 (non VC) + Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS
Budget/quality primes: Sigma 30mm 1.4 or Sigma 50mm 1.4

Don't underestimate the power of an external flash to flash at the second curtain and keep the atmosphere of the background for evening shots.
My friend joined me for a shoot with his external flash and his background was completely black, he couldn't elevate his iso too much as he has a 40D, so too much noise.

gonzogolf wrote in post #14155916 (external link)
For the most part you arent going to want anything much wider than 50 for modeling shots.


No Cam (A7RII soon) | Metabones V | 17-40 F4 L | 24-70 2.8 L | 70-200 2.8L II
Sigma 50 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art

Lighting : Godox AD600B TTL
Modifiers: 60cm Collapsible Silver Beautydish + grid | Godox 120cm Octagon softbox + grid
Tripod: Vanguard Alta 253CT carbon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 26, 2012 11:33 |  #8

CanonYouCan wrote in post #14155943 (external link)
Well I did almost a complete modelshoot with my 35L as had limited space with my 85L :)

On your crop I would sell all of them and buy :
Sigma 30mm 1.4 or Sigma 50mm 1.4
Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS

I understand the space issues, but its not the best recipe for great photos because of the issue of perspective distortion. I find too many new users pick lenses based on the convenience, not undestanding whats likely to make the best photos. Not saying thats what happened with you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpark42
Senior Member
307 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 26, 2012 12:24 |  #9

Perspective distortion is unlikely to be much of an issue with a 35mm lens on APS-C.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpark42
Senior Member
307 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 26, 2012 12:32 |  #10

NJKEV wrote in post #14155871 (external link)
I mostly shoot with the 85mm and the 50mm. I love how sharp the image is compared to my other 2 zoom lenses.

As for the lenses I listed
Since I really like the 50mm 1.8 I thought I upgrade to the 1.4
Canon 28mm and the sigma 30mm, I really love how wide they are.
Tamron 70-300 vr I listed because of its reach
Sigma 17-50 OS for everything in between.

The 50/1.4 is a decent upgrade from the 1.8, though I would look at the Sigma version over the Canon.

As for the 28 or 30, I wouldn't call either of those "wide" on APS-C, but since you like the focal length and may have low light requirements, one of these lenses might be a good first choice for you.

If your main limiting factor is reach, then the 70-300 definitely makes sense.

The Sigma 17-50 would certainly give you a stronger lens covering the wide to short tele range. If you don't need the extra speed from one of the primes, or if you need to flexibility of the zoom, this might make a good first choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 26, 2012 12:41 |  #11

bpark42 wrote in post #14156285 (external link)
Perspective distortion is unlikely to be much of an issue with a 35mm lens on APS-C.

More than you might think if you are doing anything tighter than full body shots.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpark42
Senior Member
307 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 26, 2012 13:08 |  #12

gonzogolf wrote in post #14156403 (external link)
More than you might think if you are doing anything tighter than full body shots.

We might be debating semantics here, but there really won't be much in the way of unnatural-looking distortion. Perspective is a function of distance, and the reduced angle of view on APS-C dictates a shooting distance comparable to the distance called for by a 56mm lens on full frame.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,988 posts
Likes: 964
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 26, 2012 14:00 |  #13

bpark42 wrote in post #14156553 (external link)
We might be debating semantics here, but there really won't be much in the way of unnatural-looking distortion. Perspective is a function of distance, and the reduced angle of view on APS-C dictates a shooting distance comparable to the distance called for by a 56mm lens on full frame.

I understand that, but there is a difference between unnatural distortion, and flattering photos. Since flattering photos is pretty much the goal of shooting models the longer focal length is usually a better option unless you are doing environmental portraits.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Mar 26, 2012 14:18 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #14

Have you considered selling your 60D/kit lens, and picking up a 5D II? That will give you wider FOV with all your lenses, while giving shallower DOF..as well as better high ISO performance.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,567 views & 0 likes for this thread
Keep, Sell or Buy?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is fishesman
805 guests, 397 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.