Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 29 Jul 2010 (Thursday) 01:36
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Samyang Rokinon Vivitar 14 2.8 lens

 
Mookalafalas
Goldmember
Mookalafalas's Avatar
4,899 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2010
Southern Taiwan
Mar 26, 2012 00:15 |  #1471

macvisual wrote in post #14153774external link
Paco11;

Love the seating photo, superbly framed, colour etc....

I agree. I didn't pay it much attention the first time I saw it, but the more I look at it the more I like it...especially the way the yellow and blue work together. The ceiling shows off the mustache distortion a bit, too:) I wouldn't even notice it, except I was just playing with the correction plug-in the other day, and so got a bit sensitized to it.


Call me Al Gear Flickrexternal link
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jeevz
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2010
Christchurch, New Zealand
Mar 26, 2012 22:57 |  #1472

Just been building a filter holder (to hold standard Lee filters) for this lens. A few things to iron out but it seems to be working fine.
I'm using it on a crop - i think it would probably vignette on full frame and would require the larger 150mm filters.
Will post pics soon.


Sanjeev
500pxexternal link
Flickrexternal link
Travel Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeevz
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2010
Christchurch, New Zealand
Mar 27, 2012 02:45 |  #1473

A couple of quick examples with filters (these are converted from raw with ACR but not edited):

Without Filter or Holder:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://jeevz.smugmug.c​om ...WhGbsBw/0/O/i-WhGbsBw.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


With Filter holder and Lee 0.9 ND Grad (Hard edge):
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://jeevz.smugmug.c​om ...wRxGDXM/0/O/i-wRxGDXM.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Filter holder and Grad filter on camera:
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://jeevz.smugmug.c​om ...bVQ8KCM/0/O/i-bVQ8KCM.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


So there is some vignetting with the filter holder - I feel I can fix this easily by trimming some of the corners. (For full frame I think that you would have to either cut the lens hood or use a different style holder with 150mm filters).
Also there is some light leakage (I could see that on some other shots) - I think this should be an easy fix also as I just need to add a small amount of rubber (which I have used for the slot) around the edge that the filter sits on.

Thoughts?

Sanjeev
500pxexternal link
Flickrexternal link
Travel Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
motleypixel
Senior Member
motleypixel's Avatar
412 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Austin, TX, USA
Mar 27, 2012 17:21 |  #1474

give us more detail on the stock you are building up for a mounting surface to the lee filter holder and how you are attaching, i.e. modifying the filter holder any? I know the filter holder screw-on rings go up the 85mm thread...I shoot full-frame would would definitively need a larger filter. I wish these filters didn't cost so much...would love a long sheet of a .9 GND filter to cut as I need.


Minolta Rokkor and Canon can live together in harmony.external linkhttp://vimeo.com/14891​384external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeevz
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2010
Christchurch, New Zealand
Mar 27, 2012 18:29 |  #1475

I know what you mean about the cost of the large filters...

So I started with a base of cardboard - made that into a circle to fit over the lens. Used another couple of cardboard circles to reinforce it also. (When I redo the design I will use pipe -90mm would work well - because that would be sturdier).
I filled the inside with a few layers of masking tape so that it fit snugly with the lens and wont fall off (but is still easy enough to get on/rotate)
Around the outside I put some foam (door sealing stuff that has an adhesive side already) - this was mostly to reinforce the holder... but at the front where the filter sits I put 3 layers of the foam so that I could stick the filter guides on the side.
I didn't use an entire lee holder, just a set of filter guides - measured the 100mm for the filters and stuck a piece of rubber where the filters will sit (as the back edge).
Then I screwed the filter guides into the rubber+through the foam.
On the inside of the filter holder is also a very thin layer of foam that protects the filter from hitting the lens hood.

Hope that made sense... It didn't take long to make at all.

The foam on the inside is what I have now trimmed so that the corners aren't cut in photos.
I'm not sure how this would go with stacking filters - if it doesn't work then I will consider cutting the longer pieces of the lens hood so I can bring the filters closer to the front element. (This is possibly a way of using this holder with a full frame camera also).


Sanjeev
500pxexternal link
Flickrexternal link
Travel Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
macvisual
Goldmember
macvisual's Avatar
1,692 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Scotland
Mar 28, 2012 04:08 |  #1476

IMAGE: http://i382.photobucket.com/albums/oo268/macvisual/6375_28March12.jpg

Samyang 14mm f/2.8 - Canon 5D classic

'Peter McCullough Photography'
Follow my flickr
http://flic.kr/ps/2sfe​3Pexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
PACO11
Senior Member
PACO11's Avatar
616 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Louth, Ireland
Mar 28, 2012 10:20 |  #1477

Mookalafalas wrote in post #14153790external link
I agree. I didn't pay it much attention the first time I saw it, but the more I look at it the more I like it...especially the way the yellow and blue work together. The ceiling shows off the mustache distortion a bit, too:) I wouldn't even notice it, except I was just playing with the correction plug-in the other day, and so got a bit sensitized to it.

Thanks Al


Well spotted on the mustache distortion, I did notice this but thought it could nearly have been a design feature of the building, it was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. (now im thinking i should have ran it through PT!)


Gear List
celtictenors.comexternal link
photobucketexternal link
facebookexternal link
Colm

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Goldmember
Mookalafalas's Avatar
4,899 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2010
Southern Taiwan
Mar 28, 2012 20:22 |  #1478

PACO11 wrote in post #14168538external link
(now im thinking i should have ran it through PT!)

I don't think people would notice unless they actually looked for it. Then again, I'm not very sensitive to distortion. In fact, I rather like it in most cases. I reeeaaaallly wish that the Samyang would make a fisheye for full frame (they have excellent ones for both crops and m4/3 systems).


Call me Al Gear Flickrexternal link
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

LOG IN TO REPLY
macky112
Member
161 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Irvine, CA
Mar 29, 2012 15:40 as a reply to Mookalafalas's post |  #1479

hi everyone,

I made an observation in another thread:
http://photography-on-the.net ...p?p=14175912#post14​175912

could everyone kindly comment if my observation is legit or not?

thanks

M

p.s. is it necessary if I close my other thread and continue the discussion in this thread?


Cameras: 5D III x2, 6D x2
Lenses: 14/2.8, Σ 35/1.4, 50/1.4, Σ 85/1.4, 17-40 L, 24-70/2.8 II L, 70-200/4 IS L, 70-200/2.8 IS II L
Flashes: 580EX II x3 :: Triggers: YN-622 x4

LOG IN TO REPLY
BobbyT
Goldmember
BobbyT's Avatar
1,202 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Mar 30, 2012 00:22 |  #1480

IMAGE: http://images55.fotki.com/v586/photos/2/949682/10544419/IMG_9307-vi.jpg

IMAGE: http://images55.fotki.com/v585/photos/2/949682/10544419/IMG_9269-vi.jpg

IMAGE: http://images59.fotki.com/v255/photos/2/949682/10544419/IMG_9324-vi.jpg

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Goldmember
Mookalafalas's Avatar
4,899 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2010
Southern Taiwan
Mar 30, 2012 01:03 |  #1481

Bobby T, those are awesome! That's the way I like to think of this lens, as an everyday, indoors thing.


Call me Al Gear Flickrexternal link
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

LOG IN TO REPLY
BobbyT
Goldmember
BobbyT's Avatar
1,202 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Mar 30, 2012 22:01 |  #1482

Thank you. This lens is a blast to shoot with.


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
TijmenDal
Goldmember
TijmenDal's Avatar
1,211 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Apr 01, 2012 14:44 |  #1483

Just won an auction on eBay for one of these for the nice sum of 130€. It's a Walimex branded one. Would anyone know how to tell if it's the UMC version or not? And if so, what are the differences between both? Is one much better than the other?


//Tijmen
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tijmendalexternal link

Gear
______________
flickrexternal link
_____________

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Goldmember
Mookalafalas's Avatar
4,899 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2010
Southern Taiwan
Apr 01, 2012 18:56 |  #1484

TijmenDal wrote in post #14191588external link
Just won an auction on eBay for one of these for the nice sum of 130€. It's a Walimex branded one. Would anyone know how to tell if it's the UMC version or not? And if so, what are the differences between both? Is one much better than the other?

I'm pretty certain the only difference is the name written on the side:)


Call me Al Gear Flickrexternal link
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

LOG IN TO REPLY
TijmenDal
Goldmember
TijmenDal's Avatar
1,211 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Apr 02, 2012 03:07 |  #1485

Mookalafalas wrote in post #14192627external link
I'm pretty certain the only difference is the name written on the side:)

Yeah, but there is a UMC and older non-UMC version. I wouldn't know how to tell with the Walimex.


//Tijmen
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tijmendalexternal link

Gear
______________
flickrexternal link
_____________

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

955,268 views & 642 likes for this thread
Samyang Rokinon Vivitar 14 2.8 lens
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00547 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Alex121
842 guests, 469 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016