![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
I currently have the 60mm 2.8 Macro lens and I am looking for more magnification. ATM I can not afford the MP-E 65mm so I am looking to get more magnification from the lens I already have. What would be my best option?
I am also thinking about getting a reverse mounting ring for my 50mm 1.8 but that just scares me. I am afraid the ring will get stuck or something like that and then I am in more trouble, haha. Thoughts?
__________________
Gripped 60d/ 8-16mm Sigma/ 17-55mm f/2.8/ 55-250mm IS/ 50mm 1.8/ 60mm Macro/ Kenko Extension Tubes/ Thinktank StreetWalker Pro Looking to buy a 70-300mm L or possibly a 100-400mm L |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
No help? Really? Shoot....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,488
|
I use Kenko, been happy for a long time.
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 602
|
why pay Kenko prices ? cheapo alternatives of ebay are just as Good at less than half the cost. At the end of the day there is nothing complicated about the tubes and no integral optics to affect IQ. The choice is really manual or automatic. Manual ones are dirt cheap but then you have no AF, IS or Aperture control of the lens. Difference with the automatic ones is they ensure the camera contacts are linked through the tube to the lens contacts so it doesn't really make sense why such a big difference in cost between the two types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,109
|
Get the reversal ring, you shouldn't have any more trouble with that then any other mount. The Raynox will work pretty well on a 60mm macro but it is an 8X diopter and brings you in so close that a macro focus slider is almost a necessity. Franky if you only have money for one go with the tubes. You can start with the short tube and work your way up as you get used to them. Keep in mind that you will lose light with tubes.
__________________
7D 50D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm 1.4 TC 2X TC 580EX 430 EX II MT 24 EX |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 116
|
I don't think a 50mm reversed will give you more magnification. So, unless you have a wider angle lens to reverse, then extension tubes are your best bet. And I would prefer to use AF extension tubes over a reverse ring anyway so that you have aperture control.
Reverse rings are a great way to break into macro since they're cheap, but the pain of controlling aperture makes them frustrating for a long-term solution. But I wouldn't be too concerned about using a reverse ring. Even if it does get stuck on the lens, it's still 100% usable, you can still turn it around and mount it on the camera normally. But I used them for a while, and never had an issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
Awesome, thanks everybody! I prefer the Kenko ones since I don't have to manually set everything. When taking pictures of insects that move around I won't have the time to be adjusting settings before taking more pics.
Looks like I will order my extension tubes ASAP so I can practice w/ them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
These are on the UK ebay but I am sure that they or similar are available on the international Ebay sites. HTH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
I love my Raynox. 1st, I reversed my 50mm. While I got some good shots, it was definitely a bit of a pain. I then ordered some extension tubes through Adorama that supposedly had all the connections, but they didn't work very well. Especially when they were stacked. I returned them and got a Raynox DCR 150 & couldn't be happier. It's so much easier to use than reversing or using tubes. I mostly use it on my 55-250 IS which gives me a lot of versatility. I'm definitely still a beginner with macro, but I've gotten some shots I'm very happy with.
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Jaci XTi, 18-55, 55-250 IS, Nifty Fifty, 430EX, Raynox DCR 150 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
Those are some great shots. I was thinking of pairing either extension tubes or the Raynox w/ my 60mm Macro lens. I get decent macro shots now, but just want to get closer, and pick up the details in compound eyes, etc. The lighting in your shots is awesome, I need to get bright shots like that!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,294
|
It is worth considering buying better built extension tubes. There are issues with baffling, if the light bounces about down the tubes it creates all sorts of problems. Kenko ones have good baffling, cheaper ones don't but Kenko tubes are not always a good fit. Also the method of locking is flimsy and it is quite easy to loosen a ring. Which at best turns off the auto functions at worst your lens can fall off.
It is worth doing proper research into even cheap macro options as they can end up costing more in the long run. Last edited by Snowyman : 29th of April 2012 (Sun) at 06:02. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
|
Oh man, so Kenko's are no good for the 60mm macro lens? What else should/could I try so I can more detail in my macro shots?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,294
|
I wouldn't say Kenko or tubes in general are no good, just that you do need to be aware of what you are getting for your money. Canon extension tubes cost more money but they are very probably (I don't know for certain) a firmer fit and the locking mechanism is also in all probability better. Also there may well be another extension tube manufacturer that makes a better product. It may even be cheaper than Kenko. But you want to check them out very carefully. Just picking a cheaper option on the say so of one or two people is not something you want to do as there are important things to consider that some people may or may not have considered when offering there advise.
I have a set of Kenko tubes and they are a permanent fixture on my camera while I am on a macro shoot. But I know that the lock is easy to knock off by accident and I have got used to the loose fitting joints moving about. Last edited by Snowyman : 30th of April 2012 (Mon) at 06:21. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
|
Thanks for the info! I'll look into some Canon ones, maybe I can find some used ones.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help..which to choose...close up diopters or extension tubes or Raynox or others | AFL | Macro Talk | 3 | 24th of May 2011 (Tue) 01:16 |
| Raynox DCR250 or Kenko Tubes to increase mag on 90mm 1:1 lens? | stevehollx | Macro Talk | 8 | 23rd of May 2011 (Mon) 16:33 |
| Leica 60mm extension tubes same job as Kenko tubes? | d3signer | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 5 | 4th of January 2010 (Mon) 06:47 |
| WTB kenko (or other brand) extension tubes for canon and kenko 1.5 t-con | Cathpah | Classifieds: Buy | 3 | 24th of August 2006 (Thu) 11:26 |