Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon
Thread started 28 Apr 2012 (Saturday) 12:47
PREV/NEXT

S100 vs SX260 for western US vacation pics? (plus everyday use)

 
zaboomafoo ­ zarg
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Feb 2012
MORE INFO

I'm going to buy a travel camera for a vacation I'm taking in a month. Initially I want a nice camera to capture my vacation to the western US (Grand Canyon, Sequoia, Yosemite, Yellowstone). Following that, I'll be using it for everyday use. After extensive searching I've narrowed my main considerations down to the S100 and SX260.

Does anyone have thoughts on which of these would be better in situations such as this? The S100 looks quite a bit better in terms of quality, but is missing the zoom capabilities of the SX260. Not sure if I really will need that though, I usually take more landscape than nature/animal pics.

The S95 and SX230 are also options as well I suppose.

Thanks!

Apr 28, 2012 12:47



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
S100mike
Senior Member
S100mike's Avatar
254 posts

Joined Dec 2011

Vancouver
MORE INFO

The S100 is a beautiful camera and in terms of IQ, it is pretty much the best P&S canon compact(G1x is a new class) For those nights out, low light performance is great, has a fast lens at the wide and 24mm. HD Video as well. IMO, I would not consider any other Canon compact.

Check out the S100 photo thread and see what it can do.

Apr 28, 2012 13:44

Canon PowerShot S100 makes me :-)
http://mikeneufeldphot​ography.blogspot.ca/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
eyalg
Senior Member
eyalg's Avatar
583 posts

Joined May 2008
MORE INFO

Not just for its low light capabilities, but also for it's better dynamic range and color tones,
which may produce better images of those red canyons, grey rocks and green trees.
The SX260 will also do a generally fine job, no doubt, but the S100 has the edge.

-eyalg

Apr 28, 2012 13:54

My Digital Camera Guide - www.eyalg.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
riverdog1
Senior Member
335 posts
Joined Oct 2010

East Central IL
MORE INFO

A tip: take a circular polarizer with you (like a 58mm or so) and you can hand hold it in
front of your lens. I do this a lot with the S95 and it works great, especially for landscapes,
clouds etc.

Apr 28, 2012 14:08 as a reply to eyalg's post 13 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
zaboomafoo ­ zarg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Feb 2012
MORE INFO

riverdog1 wrote in post #14344290external link
A tip: take a circular polarizer with you (like a 58mm or so) and you can hand hold it in
front of your lens. I do this a lot with the S95 and it works great, especially for landscapes,
clouds etc.

Wow, the results are impressive for polarizers! http://forums.dpreview​.com ...age=41131945&change​mode=1external link

Have you used an attachable? That seems like it would be more convenient.

Apr 28, 2012 14:36



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
zaboomafoo ­ zarg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Feb 2012
MORE INFO

The only thing stopping me from getting the S100 right this second is the "Lens Error" that a lot of people seem to be getting...

Apr 28, 2012 14:46



LOG IN TO REPLY
zaboomafoo ­ zarg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Feb 2012
MORE INFO

Dang it, Canon has too many options! The SX40 is looking pretty awesome now. I think I'm just going to have to flip a coin to choose, haha.

Apr 28, 2012 23:04



LOG IN TO REPLY
zaboomafoo ­ zarg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Feb 2012
MORE INFO

Well I ended up getting the SX40. Bought it from Walmart and have 2 weeks to return if I don't like it, but already I'm loving it. That 35x zoom is incredible, already got some amazing pictures of geese from 200 feet away. Definitely harder to carry than something like an S100 or SX260 though.

Still, I see myself probably keeping this and maybe getting a S95 on the cheap someday for true portability.

Apr 29, 2012 18:59



LOG IN TO REPLY
riverdog1
Senior Member
335 posts
Joined Oct 2010

East Central IL
MORE INFO

zaboomafoo zarg wrote in post #14344369external link
Wow, the results are impressive for polarizers! http://forums.dpreview​.com ...age=41131945&change​mode=1external link

Have you used an attachable? That seems like it would be more convenient.

I handhold a 58mm polarizer in front of the s95 lens....not attachment. I do take several
shots and rotate the polarizer a bit for each one in case the viewfinder info isn't accurate
enough. With my SLR's I always attach polarizers to the lenses when using them, but for
the p&s it isn't worth the effort because the results are fine the way I do it.

Congrats on the SX40!

Apr 29, 2012 22:44



LOG IN TO REPLY
botw
Goldmember
botw's Avatar
1,141 posts

Joined Feb 2009

Potomac, MD
MORE INFO

I ditched my s95 in favor of an sx260. I have dslrs or NEX for when I really care about low light performance. I find the sx260 to be a slightly easier size to handle, the IQ is practically indistinguishable for jpgs at common settings (the s95/100 do have some larger apertures obviously) and the extended zoom range is quite useful in a strictly vacation/P&S type camera.

May 01, 2012 12:48

www.gc5photography.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY

6,496 views & 0 likes for this thread
S100 vs SX260 for western US vacation pics? (plus everyday use)
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00106 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is casimpson
723 guests, 645 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014