LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


wow... i SUCK...

FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Sports
Thread started 01 Apr 2012 (Sunday) 17:34   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
drvnbysound
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2009
3,255 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Ltdave wrote in post #14216663external link
so, practice today...

hit the ISO to 6400...
set the shutter to 500...
was able to go with the f5.6 without any 'indication of under exposure' based on the meter and still...

lots of muddy looking, washed out (flat) images...

ive got the 70-200 f2.8 IS on the way but even when i shot the guys standing around, and deliberately let it go about 2 stops over exposed (slowing the shutter down from 500 to 125), they look crummy...

is is safe to say that EF-S glass just isnt as good, as good ol' fashioned FD glass?

i looked at the histogram deal and most of my shots are inverted bell-curves with high levels on the ends...

heres a couple of examples, with info from the DPP software (its the only thing i can do with that software. i dont know how to use if for editing, or if i even can. i did some cropping and a little bit of lightening with microsoft office 2010)...

Without even seeing it, the histogram makes sense to me. It's high on the left because there are parts of the uniform and much of the background that are darker colors as well as black. The right side of the histogram is high because of all the ice and boards that are white. The middle is relatively low because there aren't a ton of midtones.

I thought the comment about Office 2010 above was funny actually. I don't know that I've ever heard any photographer say that they used Microsoft Office to do any image editing... I suggest picking up Lightroom 4 (it's $150)external link

Post #31, Apr 29, 2012 08:31:45


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Ltdave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2012
1,691 posts
the farthest point east in michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

I thought the comment about Office 2010 above was funny actually. I don't know that I've ever heard any photographer say that they used Microsoft Office to do any image editing... I suggest picking up Lightroom 4 (it's $150)

when i played with the P&S that was all i used because i rarely needed anything other than some cropping or a little bit of exposure up/down...

its actually pretty easy to use but quite limited...

i plan on getting LR and PS but im just so jammed up right now, i need a couple of more hours in the day before i chase some software. any stores (brick/mortar or online) have 'extra hours in the day' in stock? lol

Post #32, Apr 29, 2012 17:26:13 as a reply to drvnbysound's post 8 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2008
13,781 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Ltdave wrote in post #14345926external link
well...

it would appear maybe i dont suck as bad as i thought i did. with the faster lens, ive got a lot more to work with AND with knowing a bit more and more (every time i play with it) about DPP and RAW, id say these lastest pics are much better...

i


NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com .../v155/ltdave/IMG_62​18.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO



.

a sharp f2.8 telephoto zoom really helps the shots!

and I agree about post processing, shooting in RAW and adjusting levels, contrast, exposure, etc. can add a lot

Post #33, Apr 30, 2012 05:19:38




LOG IN TO REPLY
Pierceclothier
Senior Member
Joined May 2011
100 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Ltdave wrote in post #14345926external link
well...

it would appear maybe i dont suck as bad as i thought i did. with the faster lens, ive got a lot more to work with AND with knowing a bit more and more (every time i play with it) about DPP and RAW, id say these lastest pics are much better...

i still have to figure out a way to get consistent in my PP editing because ill edit some, edit some others and then when im going through them, ill see that the first set needs more editing. i really like the way you can make the colors POP but like someone else posted on the site, i dont like to create an image, but to RECREATE the scene as it was when the picture was made...

here are a couple more examples with the faster f2.8 lenses. no color manipulation other than a notch or two of saturation increase..


NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com .../v155/ltdave/IMG_63​51.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO


i still need some more shutter speed but im trying to keep the ISO noise down...

I like this one!

Post #34, Apr 30, 2012 05:50:55


Flickrexternal link
Gear List: Canon 60D | Canon 400D + Battery Grip | 50mm 1.4 | 17-40mm F4 L | 200mm F2.8 II L (FOR SALE) | 430EX II
Wish-list: Beauty Dish | Fast and smaller then 50mm Lens

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2012
1,691 posts
the farthest point east in michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

well...

i wouldnt say that these are super, but after learning a little bit of DPP and taking some time to play around, i think i might be getting a handle on this post processing...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...155/ltdave/IMG_5391​aa.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...5/ltdave/IMG_5391aa​-1.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...155/ltdave/IMG_5430​-1.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...155/ltdave/IMG_5430​aa.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #35, Apr 30, 2012 14:57:44




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Choderboy's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
3,395 posts
Sydney, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

OK LT Dave. You don't suck!
Been interesting to see good advice, encouragement and progress.

I saw thread a few days ago, seemed to be good stuff happening in the thread, was hoping it would be identified that main problem is equipment.
Not a case of good photographer should be able to get good shots. More a case of good example where the higher end equipment will show why they cost more.

Post #36, Apr 30, 2012 17:21:43 as a reply to Ltdave's post 2 hours earlier.


Dave
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/12185187@N00/se​ts/external link
1D4, 1DS2, 1DIIn, 100D, Canon and Sigma lenses.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ltdave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2012
1,691 posts
the farthest point east in michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

In the last set of shots (the goalies) same body (T2i/550d) as all of th others, but also with the 55-250team zoom (f3.5-5.6)...

Both that and the 70-200 f2.8 require PP but the L requires LESS work from considerably more data...

Post #37, May 01, 2012 03:45:12




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,695 views & 0 likes for this thread
wow... i SUCK...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Sports



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00171 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1006 guests, 834 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is garyeng

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.