LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Dentist Needs Help Taking Dental Photos!

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk
Thread started 04 May 2012 (Friday) 01:26   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
lintendo64
Hatchling
Joined May 2012
8 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hello. I'm a dentist trying to upgrade my photography skills to better document my cases. I have the following gear:
Canon 60D
Canon 100mm Macro L Lens
Dual wireless flash with twin mount (Photomed)
Puffer Flash Diffusers

This is more or less my flash setup:

IMAGE: http://www.photomed.net/site_images/r2c__270ex_600.jpg

I spent a bundle on this equipment but I'm struggling to figure out how to make the most of them. I basically want to take "esthetic" photos of my patients' front teeth. The first picture is one of my recent shots (shutterspeed 1/200, F29... I think) with the twin flashes staggered (one closer to the object than the other). It doesn't have that artistic feel to it. I'd like my images to look like the one below it. I'd love some advice from the macro pros on this board on how to achieve these kinds of results. Thanks!

My photo:
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7227/7141151739_bd49bf9e57.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../21843877@N03/71411​51739/]external link
IMG_8367external link by eflowzexternal link, on Flickr

Good photo:
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7101/6995061622_4cd202906f.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../21843877@N03/69950​61622/]external link
207250_1657273274046_1​303549707_31413795_564​2241_nexternal link by eflowzexternal link, on Flickr

Post #1, May 04, 2012 01:26:29




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gmillerf
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2012
117 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

The one on the bottom appears to have been taken with a large diffuse light source like an umbrella or softbox. This eliminates the harsh highlights you're getting with the bare flashes.

Using flashes on a bracket is certainly more convenient than a large softbox on it's own stand, but the softbox clearly gives better results. The small bare flashes only work well for very small subjects that don't have highly reflective surfaces.

Post #2, May 04, 2012 11:32:01


Greg -- http://www.flickr.com/​photos/79652823@N00/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
DQE
Senior Member
DQE's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
168 posts
near Portland, Maine
[MORE/SHARE]

One of my dentists (a prosthodontist) seems to do well with a Canon DSLR a Canon 100mm macro lens, and a Canon MR-14 ring flash. The ring flash seems to provide uniform light for this application even though I don't personally like it for bug photography. Once the exposure settings are dialed in, it seems to do well for the front teeth as well as molars, etc.

Hope this helps. (I use a similar rig, but with the MT-24 twin-flash, for my bug photography).

Post #3, May 04, 2012 12:34:13


--Phil
Canon gear: 5D MkII, 5D, MPE-65, 100 mm 2.8 macro, 85 mm f1.2 L, 16-35 mm f2.8, 24-105 mm L, MT-24, MR-14; 550EX flash (2 units); Gitzo 2548 tripod; Gitzo monopod; Acratech Ultimate Ballhead; Manfrotto 410 geared tripod head; Cognisys StackShot rail & controller

LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Joined Aug 2007
6,557 posts
Pa
[MORE/SHARE]

Definitely some specular highlights on yours. Harsh flash will do that on reflective surfaces.

Best bet is a soft box or umbrella .

You could also shoot in an area with diffuse light and bounce some light back in with a reflector.

Post #4, May 04, 2012 12:43:19


http://steelcityphotog​raphy.zenfolio.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
AntonLargiader
Goldmember
AntonLargiader's Avatar
Joined Oct 2010
1,819 posts
Charlottesville, VA
[MORE/SHARE]

Consider the framing. The real difference between the two shots (to me) is the angle, not the lighting.

Post #5, May 04, 2012 20:55:10


T2i . 18-55 IS . 70-300 IS USM . 70-200 2.8L IS . 28mm 1.8 . 100 Macro . 430EX II . TT1/TT5 . Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
lintendo64
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined May 2012
8 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for the great input. I'm not sure how my patients would react to a white umbrella next to the dental chair, but I'm thinking of a more portable and convenient alternative. Would this pocket bouncer/diffuser do the trick? I already have the Fong Puffer Diffusers... would it be worth getting these?

http://www.lumiquest.c​om .../LumiQuest-UltraSoft.htmlexternal link

Post #6, May 05, 2012 22:38:13




LOG IN TO REPLY
Daship
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2010
765 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Yours are direct strait on light, the bottom ones are camera right 45 degree angle diffused light.

Post #7, May 06, 2012 00:03:28




LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
Senior Member
calypsob's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
943 posts
Flowery branch georgia
[MORE/SHARE]

Ok artistically, good composition rules suggest using what is known as the rule of thirds, which technically applies to all forms of photography. http://en.wikipedia.or​g/wiki/Rule_of_thirdsexternal link You can see it applied to the picture that you like. Your picture however is dead on and centered, which is not going to give you a very good composition. What you really want is to create a sense of depth, like the second picture has done with its angle and placement. Centering your subject creates a flat field which does not give a very :artistic" effect in most scenarios and also because photographs are in 2d it is up to you to decide how the human eye is going to perceive depth within your subject. Also your higlights from the flash are very shot out, or overexposed. rubber diffusers such as these http://www.linkdelight​.com ...f-Nikon-Canon-Pentax.htmlexternal link are a very cheap and quick fix. You don't need a light ring because your rig is more than sufficient for what you are doing. Also there appears to be a mildly reflective piece of black plastic or something in the second picture, which also helps to add depth to the subject. So work on your composition by using the rule of thirds and get some rubber diffusers and you are good to go. Good luck.

Post #8, May 06, 2012 00:50:29


Wes
-----------
Gear: Canon T3i, Full Spectrum Canon T2i, Asahi SMC Pentax 28mm f2.8, Asahi SMC 50mm f1.4, Leitz Wetzlar Summicron Elmarit R 35mm & 135mm. Leitz Wetzlar Summicron 50mm.

LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
Senior Member
calypsob's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
943 posts
Flowery branch georgia
[MORE/SHARE]

oh also rebatment is another good compositional technique to observe. http://en.wikipedia.or​g ...abatment_of_the_rec​tangleexternal link
You can see that rebatment was used very clearly in the second image.

Post #9, May 06, 2012 01:00:28


Wes
-----------
Gear: Canon T3i, Full Spectrum Canon T2i, Asahi SMC Pentax 28mm f2.8, Asahi SMC 50mm f1.4, Leitz Wetzlar Summicron Elmarit R 35mm & 135mm. Leitz Wetzlar Summicron 50mm.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pi_314
Senior Member
Pi_314's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
359 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

lintendo64 wrote in post #14385947external link
Thanks for the great input. I'm not sure how my patients would react to a white umbrella next to the dental chair, but I'm thinking of a more portable and convenient alternative. Would this pocket bouncer/diffuser do the trick? I already have the Fong Puffer Diffusers... would it be worth getting these?

http://www.lumiquest.c​om .../LumiQuest-UltraSoft.htmlexternal link

Try one of these. It's a half globe for a light fixture. They sell them at Home depot.

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3538/5751628994_9cf6808b5f_b.jpg
You just need to cut a hole in it to fit on the lens, and get a step up ring to hold it in place. In your case I would cut the hole at the top of the half globe, thusly there is enough room between it and your subjects face when using the 100mm. This should give you considerable diffusion, just aim your flashes at it and yer good to go.

If you decide to try this, you can't cut this material with something like a shear, as it tends to fracture. Maybe use one of your dentist tools.:lol: You might also sand the surface, as it has a bit of shine to it.

Post #10, May 06, 2012 01:06:53




LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2011
2,945 posts
The Great White North
[MORE/SHARE]

DQE wrote in post #14379300external link
One of my dentists (a prosthodontist) seems to do well with a Canon DSLR a Canon 100mm macro lens, and a Canon MR-14 ring flash.

My dentist uses the same setup, though they don't use it for aesthetic reasons that the OP is describing.

Post #11, May 06, 2012 01:14:08


Joel

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
calypsob
Senior Member
calypsob's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
943 posts
Flowery branch georgia
[MORE/SHARE]

the only time I have ever gotten my teeth photographed was when I was wearing a lead vest and the dentist left the room, go figure.

Post #12, May 06, 2012 07:54:52


Wes
-----------
Gear: Canon T3i, Full Spectrum Canon T2i, Asahi SMC Pentax 28mm f2.8, Asahi SMC 50mm f1.4, Leitz Wetzlar Summicron Elmarit R 35mm & 135mm. Leitz Wetzlar Summicron 50mm.

LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Joined Aug 2007
6,557 posts
Pa
[MORE/SHARE]

The bottom one is a product shot or at least it looks like it due to the reflection. I can imagine my dentist come in with a soft box rig *LOL* too funny. I will think you might be better off bouncing light back in via a reflector card. All depends on your window light and direction.

The is no magic bullet. If you do not want specular highlights you need diffuse light and at an angle.

Good luck.

Post #13, May 07, 2012 15:31:24


http://steelcityphotog​raphy.zenfolio.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ItzSimplymike
Senior Member
ItzSimplymike's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
637 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I've seen Dentist use ring style flashes and speedlite for close up shots for teeth shot up against a plan wall. Maybe the use of a diffuser would work but never have I seen a soft box.

Post #14, May 07, 2012 22:16:17




LOG IN TO REPLY
lintendo64
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined May 2012
8 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for all the input. I'm learning a lot about photography from this thread, including some interesting photography composition theory.

Softboxes and umbrellas are a little unrealistic for the office... and I realize I won't be able to achieve images like the one I posted without some big clunky equipment. That said, I bought the Lumiquest pocket bounce for both flashes. Will this help at all to improve my shots? I'll try them out this week and post some sample shots.

Post #15, May 08, 2012 17:42:43




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
5,228 views & 0 likes for this thread
Dentist Needs Help Taking Dental Photos!
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00141 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
751 guests, 576 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is ctx888

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.