Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk
Thread started 22 Apr 2012 (Sunday) 14:57
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Kenko extension tubes or Raynox

 
birderman
Senior Member
981 posts
Joined Mar 2011
London, UK
May 01, 2012 05:11 |  #16

The ones I got of ebay, are perfectly alright. The lock works well, the mount is metal and good tight fit with no free play, the internal finish is matt black and completely non-refelective. Seems to me that a lot of reviewers slate products without actually trying them first or they look for something with a much tighter spec. Okay the likes of Kenko is well known and established but that doesn't mean the cheaper alternatives are any less well built or inferior in quality and performance. There probably are some real cheapos that are poorly built and don't have refinements to make them good quality. The problem with most online sales is not being able to handle the goods or try them before purchase so we only have comments and reviews of online posters to rely on which in itself can be some what tricky as we all have different ideas and objectives to what makes good quality and value for money.

I still say that Branded makes probably cost a lot more than they really need to and in lots of cases one is paying for a name rather than a functional product. I think the main advantage of chosing well known brands is consistancy in quality and established support networks and after sales service, although there are many instances where well know manaufacturers have had problems. If you can justify spending upto 3x the cost then chosing the well known established manufacturer is probably right for you but should always remember that its worth checking out cheaper alternatives.


Birderman
London, UK
my photos on Flickrexternal link
My Websiteexternal link or my Facebook - KishWphotosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gmillerf
Member
117 posts
Joined Jan 2012
May 01, 2012 12:49 |  #17

smallpotatoes wrote in post #14345361external link
I then ordered some extension tubes through Adorama that supposedly had all the connections, but they didn't work very well.

What didn't work well? The autofocus or aperture control? Autofocus is always spotty with any macro, but I've never heard a complaint about aperture control.


Greg -- http://www.flickr.com/​photos/79652823@N00/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
IanW
Goldmember
IanW's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
Wiltshire, UK
May 01, 2012 14:05 |  #18

I love my Kenko tubes, you can see some of my shots hereexternal link.


Canon 5DIII | BG-E11 | 24-105mm f/4L | 70-200mm f2.8L IS II | 2x III | 430EX
Yongnuo YN-622C | Kenko Tubes | LEE Filters | Manfrotto 055CXPRO3+498RC2, 694CX

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
smallpotatoes
Senior Member
smallpotatoes's Avatar
843 posts
Joined May 2007
Longmont, CO.
May 01, 2012 16:40 |  #19

gmillerf wrote in post #14360936external link
What didn't work well? The autofocus or aperture control? Autofocus is always spotty with any macro, but I've never heard a complaint about aperture control.

I only played with them for a little while. I don't remember about the aperture. But the autofocus only worked occasionally with the smallest tube mounted. It wouldn't work at all with more than one tube or either of the other two by themselves. It wouldn't even hunt. I had ordered the Pro Optic brand with the metal mounts. But I don't think that was what I got. It didn't say Pro Optic anywhere on the box or paperwork that came with it. (I don't remember what it did say, though. Most of it was in another language.)

But for me, I'm glad I decided to go with the Raynox instead. I love how easy it is to take on & off. It just makes it so much more versatile for me. When I'm out hiking if I suddenly see something I want to take a macro of, I can just snap it on my lens & then pop it off when I'm done. No need to take the lens off 1st, then attach the tubes (and decide which one or how many) attach the lens again & then take it all back apart when I'm done.


Jaci

XTi, Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro, 55-250 IS, 50mm f/1.8, Tamron 17-50 f/2.8, 430EX, Raynox DCR 150

LOG IN TO REPLY
GOLFCRAZY
Member
34 posts
Joined Jul 2010
May 08, 2012 13:28 as a reply to smallpotatoes's post |  #20

Another option is the Canon 500d close-up lens. For a 77mm lens cost $144.99.
Look into that and see if you like it. This is like a filter you put on the end of your camera lens.

John




LOG IN TO REPLY
jjj5278
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
jjj5278's Avatar
441 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Winona, MN
May 08, 2012 14:12 |  #21

Hmmm, I may look into that. I wanted to add the extension tubes to my 60mm Macro, but the close up lens is only like $75 for a 52mm. Thanks!


More stuff than skill

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

7,316 views & 0 likes for this thread
Kenko extension tubes or Raynox
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00195 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Airbox
797 guests, 607 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016