Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk
Thread started 10 May 2012 (Thursday) 16:32
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

No shame...

 
Marzunia
Member
86 posts
Joined Sep 2009
South Bucks, UK
May 10, 2012 16:32 |  #1

Hi everyone,
I have recently came across something strange that was advertised on Youtube (as i remember well). I opened the website called asian wedding photography and was completaly shocked. The gallery of presumably his/her (no name at all) work of 10 years is full of pictures of other photographers with logos on !!!! and also taken from stock image websites!!! ( or am I wrong and forgive me) It made me speechless. So I am working hard to build up portfolio, working for free sometimes and trying to improve my skills and knowledge and there you go...
Enjoy: http://www.asianweddin​gphotography.biz/external link

I just wonder what this logo of Society of Wedding and Portrait Photographers there means.


Marzena
EOS 1D mark III, EOS 400D with kit lens 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, Speedlite 580EX II, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, 50mm 1.4
EF 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 II USM,
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 III, Hama Star 63, Hoya Polarizers

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PeaceFire
Goldmember
PeaceFire's Avatar
2,281 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
May 10, 2012 17:25 |  #2

I have no idea what you are referring to. I see one gallery that has about 20 pictures in it from maybe 3-4 weddings that look consistent with each other (so presumably from the same photographer) and no logos anywhere. Not sure if you're trying to give a competitor a bad name or something, but this is not the place to do it. If there's another gallery on that site I'm not seeing point the way, but his main gallery looks legit.


My Gear List / My Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
spb
Senior Member
582 posts
Joined Nov 2009
NH
May 10, 2012 17:46 as a reply to PeaceFire's post |  #3

PeaceFire, on the first page of the gallery see images 10 and 18.


60d | 50d | grip | 11-16 2.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 24-105 | 70-200 II | 60 macro | 580EXII x2
flickrexternal link | gear | feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
PeaceFire
Goldmember
PeaceFire's Avatar
2,281 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
May 10, 2012 18:09 |  #4

So why don't you contact the person who's photo was stolen and alert him of it? It may be a wedding they worked on together, too, and this person may have every right to share that image. Although with a website like that I highly doubt they're getting much business, anyway.


My Gear List / My Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
brokensocial
Senior Member
481 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Chicago, Illinois
May 10, 2012 22:30 |  #5

I just read something today about a photographer who used other togs' pictures and got busted on Twitter, Facebook, etc, overnight...


[mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
chicago wedding photographyexternal link | chicago wedding photography blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Marzunia
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
86 posts
Joined Sep 2009
South Bucks, UK
May 11, 2012 04:48 |  #6

PeaceFire wrote in post #14412520external link
I have no idea what you are referring to. I see one gallery that has about 20 pictures in it from maybe 3-4 weddings that look consistent with each other (so presumably from the same photographer) and no logos anywhere. Not sure if you're trying to give a competitor a bad name or something, but this is not the place to do it. If there's another gallery on that site I'm not seeing point the way, but his main gallery looks legit.

I am not trying to be mean and to bring a bad name to competition is not my way. I am not that person. Have no idea why you got it this way. I doubt you would be sitting quietly if you spotted your pictures in somebody's portfolio. It is dicgraceful thing to do and on high scale these days ( did you read about Tesco?). And i guess that matter needs attention no matter who does it. In that particular gallery pictures are coming from yay images stock image website, from christophe and another photographer still with watermaks on if you look really carefully at pictures. And no, they are not consistent in style and editing in any way. That's another thing which is visible. It is like somebody thrown a mixture of everything in a one pot.


Marzena
EOS 1D mark III, EOS 400D with kit lens 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, Speedlite 580EX II, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, 50mm 1.4
EF 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 II USM,
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 III, Hama Star 63, Hoya Polarizers

LOG IN TO REPLY
reneefk
Member
reneefk's Avatar
217 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Los Angeles, CA
May 11, 2012 22:15 |  #7

brokensocial- I read that today too:

http://www.examiner.co​m ...own-a-wedding-photo-fakerexternal link




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,026 views & 0 likes for this thread
No shame...
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00108 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is caiocezart
844 guests, 711 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015