LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Afforadable Macro lenses

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk
Thread started 01 May 2012 (Tuesday) 16:59   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
loganator11
Mostly Lurking
loganator11's Avatar
Joined Mar 2012
19 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I have been getting into macro photography the past few weeks but can't get that close with the pathetic kit lens.I was wondering if you guys could help recommed some afforable but still OK macro lenses. thanks

Post #1, May 01, 2012 16:59:34




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
GJim
Goldmember
GJim's Avatar
Joined Apr 2010
1,180 posts
On the road, Again!
[MORE/SHARE]

loganator11 wrote in post #14362361external link
I have been getting into macro photography the past few weeks but can't get that close with the pathetic kit lens.I was wondering if you guys could help recommed some afforable but still OK macro lenses. thanks

Instead of immediately jumping into a dedicated macro-lens, how about starting with a set of extension tubes.

This set would allow you to use your existing lens and get quite close to your subjects.
http://www.adorama.com​/MCAETEOSP.htmlexternal link

Do realize, regardless of whether you utilize a dedicated lens or the extension tubes, your depth-of-field will be really shallow -- which can then lead to experimenting with focus-stacking .... it's a slippery slope, pard.

Post #2, May 01, 2012 18:33:41


G'Jim c):{- ... 50D (Gripped), 7D (Gripped), assorted glass, sundry accouterments.
The beginner clicks the shutter and says "Let's see what I got." ... The experienced photographer thinks "How can I capture what I see?"
My Photography and my Blog: http://www.gjim.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mswobo
Senior Member
mswobo's Avatar
Joined Mar 2010
994 posts
Illinois
[MORE/SHARE]

Used Sigma 150 2.8 about 450.00

Post #3, May 02, 2012 01:24:48


5D III / 17-40 / 24-105 / 35 1.4 / 70-200 MK II / 40 2.8 / 50 1.4 / 580 EX & 580 EXII /
"Every time I set up I learn something new".

LOG IN TO REPLY
HoT.Shek
Senior Member
HoT.Shek's Avatar
Joined Aug 2011
614 posts
HKG
[MORE/SHARE]

cheapest probably Tamron 90mm or Sigma 105mm.
Both have excellent image quality.

Post #4, May 02, 2012 11:50:59


6D 600D 5Dc 1Dclassic 1DII EOSM
Canon 70-200 小小白IS│24│85│135L
Macro lenses T60mm F/2│S150mm F/2.8│Bokina│CV APO Lanthar SL

LOG IN TO REPLY
Japers
Senior Member
Japers's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
190 posts
Palmetto Point, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

I had a Sigma 50mm f2.8 Macro for a few years before I switched to all Canon gear and it was a great performer.. Amazon has it for $350-ish and you can find them on eBay for anywhere from $150-$250 in excellent condition. ;)

Post #5, May 02, 2012 20:11:33 as a reply to HoT.Shek's post 8 hours earlier.


60D + Lenses = Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
calypsob
Senior Member
calypsob's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
943 posts
Flowery branch georgia
[MORE/SHARE]

or you could buy a reversing ring for a lens 50mm or less. that will give you a taste of macro functioning

Post #6, May 03, 2012 00:02:57


Wes
-----------
Gear: Canon T3i, Full Spectrum Canon T2i, Asahi SMC Pentax 28mm f2.8, Asahi SMC 50mm f1.4, Leitz Wetzlar Summicron Elmarit R 35mm & 135mm. Leitz Wetzlar Summicron 50mm.

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
do I really have to respond?
tonylong's Avatar
Joined Sep 2007
53,001 posts
Vancouver, WA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I've been a happy user of the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro for a number of years, even though it's now "old".

You can get close with the longer focal length, you can also use it from longer distances and the AF performs reasonably well. It's a good, versatile lens.

Post #7, May 03, 2012 01:00:04


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fotoworx
"I get 'em pregnant"
fotoworx's Avatar
Joined Mar 2009
4,547 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

tonylong wrote in post #14370931external link
I've been a happy user of the Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro for a number of years, even though it's now "old".

Me too and these have really fallen in price since Canon brought out an L version. A mate of mine has the newer version and I can't tell the difference between images shot between it and mine. Not saying that there isn't a difference, just saying that I can't see it.

Post #8, May 03, 2012 01:11:39


.
Jim
.
f o t o w o r xexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
aquaregia
Mostly Lurking
Joined Jan 2011
11 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Ditto on the extension tubes. I use them on all my lenses, even my 400mm f5.6L A decent metal set that carries through the electronics will run about $200.

Post #9, May 12, 2012 10:22:21 as a reply to GJim's post 10 days earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
orionmystery
Cream of the Crop
orionmystery's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
11,100 posts
Malaysia
[MORE/SHARE]

You can also get a cheap reversal ring for your kit lens....a reversed 18-55mm kit lens will get you from 1x to about 3x.

http://orionmystery.bl​ogspot.com/2011/02/che​ap-macro.htmlexternal link

Post #10, May 15, 2012 09:13:43


Kurt, 70D/40D, 60mm F2/270EX, MP-E65/MT-24EX for full flashexternal link, Sigma 150 +1.4x TC for natural lightexternal link.
Macro Rigexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,131 views & 0 likes for this thread
Afforadable Macro lenses
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00102 for 7 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1157 guests, 823 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is surfsidetim

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.