![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
i was just wondering if there are any specific ways to reduce the amount facebook degrades an image? my images get a soft grainy look to them when uploaded yet i have seen other photographers who manage to control the problem to a better degree than what i am able to do it. is there something i should know?
i tried uploading a reduced size of around 600 x 400 pixels saved from photoshop as jpeg quality set to 12. also tried clicking on the option to upload high quality and even tried larger sizes but i have had no luck. plase help. thanks
__________________
The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: O-H
Posts: 3,285
|
I learned this past week they have a high quality feature for albums.
__________________
Christian Facebook Fan Page! Website Blog D800 + Zeiss = I'm going to Southeast Asia! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 194
|
I upload at image size 1024.. Seems to work in most cases. Sometimes for a good photo I will comment on the FB pic with a photobucket link to the same photo.. That way if the subject viewing the photo wants to see a slightly better IQ upload, they can do so by clicking my comment link.
__________________
ᏂᎦᏓ ᎠᏂᏴᏫ ᏂᎨᎫᏓᎸᎾ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏂᏠᏱ ᎤᎾᏕᎿ ᏚᏳᎧᏛ ᎨᏒᎢ. ᎨᏥᏁᎳ ᎤᎾᏓᏅᏖᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏃᏟᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᏌᏊ ᎨᏒ ᏧᏂᎸᏫᏍᏓᏁᏗ ᎠᎾᏟᏅᏢ ᎠᏓᏅᏙ ᎬᏗ. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Overland, MO.
Posts: 423
|
Before you downsize your image and save for facebook are you applying any sharpening?
__________________
- Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
attached is my facebook image and below is the image from flickr. its not a matter of sharpening
![]()
__________________
The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 10,306
|
haha.. the flickr looks better than fb. and yes.. fb compresses your images to crap. it was never meant to be storage for high quality pics. I'm sure the photos look fine when viewed from a cell phone.
__________________
Julian Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug Founding member and President of the OGUS Photo Club (Over-Geared, Under-Skilled) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Overland, MO.
Posts: 423
|
Flickr does apply sharpening to photo's that are uploaded. If I were intent on uploading photos to both I would sharpen photo's uploaded to facebook and do half of that amount or none at all to photo's going to flickr. And yes compression happens.
__________________
- Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
the facebook image is only 20Kb so theyre really compacting the hek out of the images.
__________________
The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Goldmember
|
I'm surprised that Facebook hasn't started charging to display images at a higher quality. Everyone I know would pay a few bucks to make their families look better than their friends' families.
__________________
Fuji X10 for camera-processed high quality snapshots Canon 7D with Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 17-55mm, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4, and 150-500mm, 580EX. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 931
|
Set your image to 72 dpi and 1024 on the long side, they will look much nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: O-H
Posts: 3,285
|
They need to find a way to recoup the money they've lost one way or another.
__________________
Christian Facebook Fan Page! Website Blog D800 + Zeiss = I'm going to Southeast Asia! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
|
I have noticed if you have a shot with high ISO...FB will bring out way more noise than there appears to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Goldmember
|
I just loaded a 404k iPhone snap and FB compressed it to 139k. I usually put my camera pictures up at about 150k and FB compresses them to around 110k. FB must have some seriously large storage devices since a little while ago users were adding 2.5 billion pictures every month. probably more now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 931
|
They have so many supercomputers that they are hydro-cooled. Though that is the standard now with cloud computing and other large storage systems from silicon valley. Companies (I believe Google is the most recent; in the Dalles), have moved their storage facilities to the Columbia River for cooling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
Quote:
Well they must be loaded to want to pay for that service
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| bad quality photos on Facebook | binderring | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 30 | 26th of May 2011 (Thu) 16:32 |
| Help - low quality uploads onto Facebook | chelledelirious88 | Small Compact Digitals by Canon | 8 | 1st of January 2011 (Sat) 20:11 |
| Facebook quality | tuaz0090 | Presentation | 18 | 23rd of March 2010 (Tue) 11:05 |
| Facebook image quality | Damo77 | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 39 | 13th of March 2010 (Sat) 21:55 |
| HELP! Adobe Ruining Images??? | MG30D | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 23 | 1st of February 2010 (Mon) 08:26 |