Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Transportation
Thread started 06 Jun 2012 (Wednesday) 12:32
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Helicopter Prop Blur

 
dscri001
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2011
Virginia Beach, Virgina
Jun 06, 2012 12:32 |  #1

Hello everyone, I just had a question about this. I was down at about 1/60 and was getting decent prop blur. What do you guys think? More lower shutter? How do you guys shoot helos? Comments/advice is appreciated. Thanks! Also, I don't have my laptop at the moment (usually use LR) and this was done with my desktop on dpp so please excuse the poor quality :lol:

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7102/7343992590_61dbc24ff9_c.jpg

-Tyler I II
EOS 6D, EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 40 f/2.8, Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 ZE, EF 85 f/1.8, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TheBigDog
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2009
Sicklerville, NJ, USA
Jun 06, 2012 13:48 |  #2

Well helos are about as tough as you get to have decent rotor blur but sharp enough body.
Looking at your shot I'd say you did a darn good job there of getting both, not sure you can ask for more!
If the helo is moving i doubt you'd be able to get much lower than 1/60, if it is in hover, maybe depending on the lens.


Chris
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Nikon D5 * D810 * 24-70 f/2.8 * Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art * 105mm f/2.8 * 70-200 f/2.8 * 80-400mm * Sigma Sport 150-600mm

LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Jun 06, 2012 13:57 |  #3

That's pretty much fine for a Helo...

Better a sharp shot with ok blur than a blurry mess with a full disc.


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwol
Senior Member
jwol's Avatar
777 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Centreville,VA
Jun 06, 2012 14:03 as a reply to TheBigDog's post |  #4

I'd say you did very well at 1/60. I chickened out and shot mine at 1/100-1/160 with the 100-400. That being said, I think that lens needs to go to Canon for some work. I find I fight the IS frequently and I think I have an aperture blade or spring that is getting hung up at the long end.

Rotor diameter as well as power settings on the helo are going to come into play here as well. How were your shots of the MH-53?


John Lackey
Fly By Photographyexternal link
Blogexternal link

Radial engines don't actually leak oil, by the way. They just mark their territory!

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrewhuxman
Cream of the Crop
andrewhuxman's Avatar
8,601 posts
Joined May 2005
Rockford Illinois
Jun 06, 2012 16:59 |  #5

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #14540675external link
That's pretty much fine for a Helo...

Better a sharp shot with ok blur than a blurry mess with a full disc.

So so true, learned that the hard way (wasting clicks)


A little L goes a long way.

Canon 5D4, 7D2, 7D, 40D, gripped,16-35MM 2.8L,24-105MM F4L,70-200MM 2.8 IS USM L,500MM F4L
www.machtwomedia.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
dscri001
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2011
Virginia Beach, Virgina
Jun 06, 2012 17:42 |  #6

Thanks for the comments guys. I've never really photographed a helo before. I pretty much went to tv and started from 1/200 and clicked down the shutter each shot crossing my fingers. This was one of maybe 4 keepers at around 1/60. I was pretty excited!

How were your shots of the MH-53?

I got a few good ones, but by then I was more concerned with getting good pictures instead of 'practicing' slow shutters as flyingphotog said :lol: I think I just stuck with 160. I have to wait till the weekend to buy a new laptop, seeing how mine decided to break the morning of the airshow. So now I'm going crazy with a couple thousand pictures waiting to be processed.

Anyway, here's one straight out of dpp.

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7083/7161297279_1c34510051_c.jpg

-Tyler I II
EOS 6D, EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 40 f/2.8, Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 ZE, EF 85 f/1.8, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrewhuxman
Cream of the Crop
andrewhuxman's Avatar
8,601 posts
Joined May 2005
Rockford Illinois
Jun 06, 2012 19:51 |  #7

I have static shots of that very same helo .


A little L goes a long way.

Canon 5D4, 7D2, 7D, 40D, gripped,16-35MM 2.8L,24-105MM F4L,70-200MM 2.8 IS USM L,500MM F4L
www.machtwomedia.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckie365
Senior Member
chuckie365's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
San Diego
Jun 06, 2012 20:32 |  #8

Thats a great capture of the helo. I don't think i have ever tried less than 1/60....yet... :P

This was at 1/15 but he was hovering so that doesn't really count...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Few Canons...few lenses...
Flickrexternal link

http://www.scapeshots.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Desertraptor's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
Adelaide, Australia
Jun 07, 2012 05:37 |  #9

Try a moving Chinook :o
These all look great


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

LOG IN TO REPLY
dscri001
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2011
Virginia Beach, Virgina
Jun 07, 2012 12:16 |  #10

andrewhuxman wrote in post #14542186external link
I have static shots of that very same helo .

Oceana Air show 2011 maybe? I've seen them parked at Norfolk but never in flight. They're gigantic :shock:


-Tyler I II
EOS 6D, EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 40 f/2.8, Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 ZE, EF 85 f/1.8, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L, 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
cicopo's Avatar
Joined Mar 2007
Ottawa, Ont, Canada
Jun 07, 2012 14:46 |  #11

This is the best I've done which is at 1/40 sec & was from a set where I went through most settings from 1/120 down to 1/15 and anything lower than the 1/40 wasn't acceptable. The hover really helped but the troops dropping down the lines were a bit blurry below the 1/40. I think 1/60 was just a tiny bit sharper so eather proved usable. R/C heli's are much easier to shoot re prop blur but they dart about so fast it's a whole different challenge.

IMAGE: http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-JRFFoFX34Gk/T0JVYm7O4sI/AAAAAAAAFj4/a6RwX_cwNYc/s1024/IMG_5750v1.JPG

A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Jun 07, 2012 14:56 |  #12

One of my fav helo shots...

IMAGE: http://crosswindimages.com/img/s3/v23/p846197262.jpg
1DMkIII + 300mm f/2.8L IS .. 1/30 @ f/22 ISO 100

Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrewhuxman
Cream of the Crop
andrewhuxman's Avatar
8,601 posts
Joined May 2005
Rockford Illinois
Jun 07, 2012 16:17 |  #13

Desertraptor wrote in post #14543843 (external link)
Try a moving Chinook :o
These all look great

Dug this one out from a couple years ago .....:)

IMAGE: http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t47/ahuxman58/IMG_0481.jpg

A little L goes a long way.

Canon 5D4, 7D2, 7D, 40D, gripped,16-35MM 2.8L,24-105MM F4L,70-200MM 2.8 IS USM L,500MM F4L
www.machtwomedia.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Gary ­ McDuffie
Goldmember
Gary McDuffie's Avatar
3,022 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Scottsbluff, NE USA
Jun 07, 2012 19:42 |  #14

A to A Jay?


Gary
"I'm not much of an artist, but I like to document certain things that I see."
----------
5DII, 7D, some L, Manfroto one and three legged devices, shooting & learning bit by bit via POTN

LOG IN TO REPLY
ChunkyDA
Goldmember
ChunkyDA's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
Emerald Coast, FL
Jun 07, 2012 19:43 |  #15

300mm was a bit too much as this helo passed nearly overhead. 1/100 sec

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Dave
Support Search and Rescue, Get Lostexternal link
Gear list and some feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

89,842 views & 320 likes for this thread
Helicopter Prop Blur
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Transportation


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00168 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is J4T4lyfe
752 guests, 275 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016