![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 148
|
Just want clarification from the experts out there ... is it common practice to shoot using AF centre point for "general" wildlife like it is for Avian/Bird photography (makes sense to me but what do I know !) ?
__________________
Canon T2i paired with 100-400L IS USM | Canon T3i paired with 400mm f5.6L | Manfrotto 679B Monopod |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
For larger wildlife, I'll usually move the AF point around so that I can frame them, with the eye in focus; for smaller things I'll usually shoot with the center point, since I know I'm going to be cropping anyway (since they're too far out to fill the frame).
__________________
- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (7D, 40D, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Tamron 18-270 DiII PZD, 580EX II) "The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Palm Beach, Fl
Posts: 2,233
|
I pretty much never use the center point. depends on how your framing the shot in camera though. with a 1D3, you don't have much room for cropping, so you have to get it right when you take it.
Here are some examples: ![]() A cormorant dries its wings by robertwsimpson, on Flickr AF point on eye ![]() Female Norther Harrier in flight by robertwsimpson, on Flickr all points selected I always use AI servo mode though. I never use one shot because generally things are moving way too fast for that.
__________________
1D mkIII | 5D mkII | 50mm f/1.4 | 17-40mm f/4 | 70-200mm f/2.8 | 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
I only use the center AF and focus on the eye or face depending on what I can see and then recompose the shot before capture for still subjects. Comes down to user pref ultimately though. My logic behind the madness is my quicker switch to Servo AF for moving critter and BIF where I use the center AF point.
__________________
Adam - Upstate NY: |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 148
|
thanks all, varying responses as expected, but all make sense ... agree with NN (Nature Nut), it all comes down to user preference ... my biggest fear is that I miss the perfect shot (there 1 second, gone the next) due to poor choices, that is why I want to practice big time with my new 100-400mm lense so I ultimately know what works for me ...
__________________
Canon T2i paired with 100-400L IS USM | Canon T3i paired with 400mm f5.6L | Manfrotto 679B Monopod |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 931
|
I always use the center point and Back Button Focus to recompose (when needed). Its the best method that I have found for me. And the center point tends to be the most accurate on all cameras.
I suggest you try out BBFing, its one of the best assets for wildilfe/bird photography. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 931
|
you should try checking out arthur morris' Back Button Focus Tutorial
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
Don't you guys ever have problems with branches behind the birds getting focused?
I've been using MF for the past three years, the few times I tried AF the surroundings of the bird was in focus, not him. I think the center spot is too big. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The only time I have that problem is when the branches or tall vegetation are in the foreground and im shooitng through them (ie: a bird in the bush) Then MF is really the only way to go.
__________________
Adam - Upstate NY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 931
|
Quote:
I frequently use MF when in thick brush. But even then, once I get pretty close to perfect focus I go back over to AF; even with dense brush. AF is faster and more accurate in most situations than any human will ever be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Not really, not if the bird is anywhere close to filling the frame. If the bird is just a small blob in the centre of the frame then, yes, AF can be a problem. But who cares about a picture of a blob?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
background branches dont bother my 60d but foreground one absolutely do/can. MF works well then and thank goodness for back button focus on the body and full time manual on the lens. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 40D or 50D: Wildlife | vondo | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 5 | 16th of September 2011 (Fri) 14:43 |
| HDR 'look' for wildlife? | promocop | Wildlife Talk | 2 | 18th of April 2010 (Sun) 18:53 |
| Wildlife Set | Jacobredphoto | Wildlife | 8 | 7th of July 2009 (Tue) 19:44 |
| FIRST WILDLIFE | pads69 | Wildlife | 4 | 30th of October 2007 (Tue) 08:19 |
| Wildlife at the Zoo | vulcan | Wildlife | 0 | 11th of June 2007 (Mon) 19:02 |