Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk 
Thread started 12 Jun 2012 (Tuesday) 00:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Advice/Tips please: 50mm f/1.8

 
Immaculens
creeped by the TF....
Avatar
12,941 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 2597
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Southern Canada
     
Jun 12, 2012 00:57 |  #1

Night-sky newbie here!

I attached my nifty-fifty the other night and took various 35 second exposures, typically at f/2.2, ISO400 - bulb - remote shutter release

But in Live View using manual focus (10x) I was unable to get the focus I wanted - I had it turned all the way... to infinity I guess - and it seemed like it could have been sharper yet

If anyone else has done shots with their 50mm f/1.8 please share your successful settings... I imagine I was getting star-trails after about 8 seconds or less. 40 secs certainly showed the beginnings of trails.

I guess I will go back to using my 15-85mm - likely at 15mm f/3.5

Thanks for any tips. A processed shot with the above (top) settings is attached


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Will immaculens.com (external link) gear
Learn to love to do well, and you shall. ~ C. Poseidon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
the ­ jimmy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,420 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Jun 12, 2012 20:18 |  #2

Immaculens wrote in post #14566579 (external link)
Night-sky newbie here!

But in Live View using manual focus (10x) I was unable to get the focus I wanted - I had it turned all the way... to infinity I guess - and it seemed like it could have been sharper yet

Focusing all the way to infinity is to far, you'll need to back off ever so slightly




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Immaculens
THREAD ­ STARTER
creeped by the TF....
Avatar
12,941 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 2597
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Southern Canada
     
Jun 12, 2012 21:10 as a reply to  @ the jimmy's post |  #3

hmmm... strange - I was trying to make the star - during manual focus - as small as I could and it seemed it was in the process of getting small but then I could not turn it further...

also - is it recommended I use my 50mm over the 15mm?

less exposure time...


Will immaculens.com (external link) gear
Learn to love to do well, and you shall. ~ C. Poseidon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James33
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Memphis, TN
     
Jun 20, 2012 15:29 |  #4

Your exposure time is too long using a 50mm lens on a crop body camera, unless you are using a tracking mount. It's causing the stars to start to "trail" due to the earth's movement.

Go back to your 15mm, start at 30 sec exposure max, use f/3.5 and ISO 1600/3200 if you can swing it. And what I do for focus is use manual focus in daylight and focus on infinity. Once you find the spot you can mark it on your lens so you don't have to hunt for it.

Hope this helps


www.jamesparkerphoto.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Immaculens
THREAD ­ STARTER
creeped by the TF....
Avatar
12,941 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 2597
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Southern Canada
     
Jun 20, 2012 15:41 |  #5

James33 wrote in post #14607480 (external link)
Your exposure time is too long using a 50mm lens on a crop body camera, unless you are using a tracking mount. It's causing the stars to start to "trail" due to the earth's movement.

Go back to your 15mm, start at 30 sec exposure max, use f/3.5 and ISO 1600/3200 if you can swing it. And what I do for focus is use manual focus in daylight and focus on infinity. Once you find the spot you can mark it on your lens so you don't have to hunt for it.

Hope this helps

Thanks - yes - the exposure on the 50 was way too long - considering that for 15mm it should not be past 22 seconds :D

I'll be selling my rarely used but excellent 15-85mm and getting other toys like the G12 (got it already), new 40mm STM (selling the 50), and its hard to believe I'm writing this - the 18-55 IS... :eek: But, that will give me 18mm for the rare times I use it...

Thanks for the reply - cheers ~


Will immaculens.com (external link) gear
Learn to love to do well, and you shall. ~ C. Poseidon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nature ­ Nut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,366 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2012
Location: NY
     
Jun 20, 2012 15:43 |  #6

When I have used my nifty fifty for some night shots, I focus to infinity then back off a hair.Some, if not most, lenses today will allow you to go just past the infinity mark by hair. I found I prefer using a wide angle lens better for the most part though.


Adam - Upstate NY:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Immaculens
THREAD ­ STARTER
creeped by the TF....
Avatar
12,941 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 2597
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Southern Canada
     
Jun 20, 2012 15:57 as a reply to  @ Nature Nut's post |  #7

wide would be my preference also - I was just surprised I could not manually focus on stars with my copy of the 50...


Will immaculens.com (external link) gear
Learn to love to do well, and you shall. ~ C. Poseidon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
A.S.I.G.N. ­ Observatory
...For the future of mankind
Avatar
2,445 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 662
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Canberra, Australia
     
Jun 22, 2012 22:48 |  #8

Immaculens wrote in post #14566579 (external link)
1. I had it turned all the way... to infinity I guess - and it seemed like it could have been sharper yet

2. I guess I will go back to using my 15-85mm - likely at 15mm f/3.5

1. Every lens has it's sweet spot. It is usually just back a fraction from infinity and it's something you have to, feel" for rather than a set place.

2. Correct. That would be MUCH better.

The longer you go in focal length, the shorter your exposures will have to be to avoid star trails. Otherwise, get a mount that tracks.

Baz.


Builds By Baz website http://www.buildsbybaz​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,478 views & 0 likes for this thread
Advice/Tips please: 50mm f/1.8
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ppahv
765 guests, 390 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.