Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk 
Thread started 02 Jul 2012 (Monday) 14:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

WWYD: Primary photog wants to duplicate my LR settings. Do I tell?

 
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,916 posts
Likes: 330
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 03, 2012 14:44 as a reply to  @ post 14664469 |  #16

tfizzle wrote in post #14664005 (external link)
I'd throw a bone but I surely wouldn't sit down and give a step-by-step process on multiple images.

This person has given the OP a lot, more than almost any other photographer would. I think they should return the favour.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Jul 03, 2012 14:55 |  #17

Enter a link to any of your photos to this site, then scroll down and tell me what you see: http://regex.info/exif​.cgi/exif.cgi (external link)

mirrorrim wrote in post #14664468 (external link)
Yes, it would be very easy to figure out.

I think this is what I'm going to do. I convinced her to switch over to LR to process her RAWs, so I'm gonna give a basic run down of what each slider does. She probably could easily figure it all out, since she is an avid photoshop user.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tfizzle
Senior Member
785 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Jul 03, 2012 15:25 |  #18

tim wrote in post #14666201 (external link)
This person has given the OP a lot, more than almost any other photographer would. I think they should return the favour.

I understand that but this is what stuck out to me from the OP:

She then said she really likes my aesthetic and that's what she wants to have in her photos. She asked me to email her step by step instructions. I may or may not get photo credit.

She has given him a lot but she has received quite a bit too. FREE raw files from a second shooter. That's super nice. He's not getting paid . . . and she wants to use his "aesthetics" for her business. That's not a bad idea but it just sounds off to me. I wouldn't be willing to take pictures, give the raws, and tutor the person getting them how to make her portfolio just like mine. Again, I'd throw a bone and show a couple of images and how I did it, I would even give a preset and show which file I would use it on.

After reading through the OP again it sounds like she just wants to have it seamless for a magazine spread? If so I'd go through the photos with her for that specific job and I wouldn't really care about credit since I would be a "work for hire" and representing HER business.

I would not go beyond that and give her every little recipe. And my sneaky suspicion is that even if you do give her all the recipes she wouldn't be able to duplicate it over the long haul. Once you get in a groove for a set of photos during PP everything changes as the light changes and you really have to know how get things consistent by using all the tools in LR. Maybe she'd be able to do it, maybe not.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,233 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 379
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Jul 03, 2012 15:30 |  #19

jamiewexler wrote in post #14662274 (external link)
And those of you that think that LR presets are the key to being a successful photography business owner, are not likely to be successful photography business owners for long.

+1 This.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Jul 03, 2012 15:59 as a reply to  @ joedlh's post |  #20

I guess I don't look at second shooting that way, since I still do a lot of it. To me, second shooting and assisting are 2 distinct jobs. Ideally, when learning the ropes, one would take on an assistant job to get a feel for weddings, and maybe snap a few here and there and perhaps slowly build up a portfolio. A second shooter to me is an additional set of eyes. I know not all of you look at it that way and some of you would rather have an assistant holding stuff for you than a second shooter. Perfectly understandable. I feel that an assistant is sometimes more useful as well or is a great person to have in addition to a second shooter.

That said, I have never, ever second shot for free. NEVER. My time. My skills. I'm going to get paid for it. I hire out a second specifically because I want additional shots and I like his/her style. If it's an opportunity for that person to learn from me, then so be it. That's great. But as far as I am concerned, it's a 2 way street. I'm getting photos I might not be able to get. I'm also getting another pair of eyes and maybe some additional; ideas. For that I pay the second shooter. I would never ask someone to shoot for free, especially in a legit second shooter's assignment.

So honestly, the whole free thing to me just sounds annoying and I still think the OP is being taken advantage of. It's a strange situation though, and again, when money gets in the middle of things, it never ends well.


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mirrorrim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
87 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jul 03, 2012 17:27 |  #21

PixelMagic wrote in post #14666252 (external link)
Enter a link to any of your photos to this site, then scroll down and tell me what you see: http://regex.info/exif​.cgi/exif.cgi (external link)

Not sure what I'm looking for here.

~~~~~~

I gave her a general run down of how I use LR. Nothing specific, because I dont have anything specific that I use. Basically just advice like "I use tone curve for contrast, instead of the slider," "I dont touch the saturation slider, but I like to boost up the clarity and vibrance a bit."

She emailed back and thanked me and basically she knew everything I told her, and said "but it seemed like there was something a bit "more" in your photos! Being a lightroom newbie I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything. I think it's the clarity and vibrance that I hadn't been doing that may be different."




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Jul 03, 2012 17:46 |  #22

The point is that any adjustments made in Lightroom can be analyzed/reproduced if you leave the EXIF metadata intact. Processing in LR is hardly a secret.

mirrorrim wrote in post #14666808 (external link)
Not sure what I'm looking for here.

~~~~~~

I gave her a general run down of how I use LR. Nothing specific, because I dont have anything specific that I use. Basically just advice like "I use tone curve for contrast, instead of the slider," "I dont touch the saturation slider, but I like to boost up the clarity and vibrance a bit."

She emailed back and thanked me and basically she knew everything I told her, and said "but it seemed like there was something a bit "more" in your photos! Being a lightroom newbie I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything. I think it's the clarity and vibrance that I hadn't been doing that may be different."


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mirrorrim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
87 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jul 03, 2012 19:10 as a reply to  @ PixelMagic's post |  #23

Doh. I figured that was you're point but didnt see anything. Then I remembered I strip my metadata for photos I post online.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jul 03, 2012 20:03 |  #24

I dont really get everyone saying the OP is being taken advantage of. No one is holding a gun to their head, it doesnt sound like they are locked into any contract. If they feel they arent getting what they should be, then they should tell the main shooter that they dont want to shoot for free any more - simple as that.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Jul 04, 2012 02:31 |  #25

First, totally reasonable question ;)

A few thoughts...

1. Unless you're one in a million, you will most likely not look back at this processing style with much fondness -- no less with the idea that the processing is something that should be protected and hidden. So since you're probably not going to be depending on this style of processing in the future, it'd probably pay some dividends to help out this photographer who has clearly helped you out.

2. But the pragmatist in me simply knows I wouldn't do this. It's too long and time consuming. You want me to go through a few HUNDRED images and show you how I processed them all?!? My solution would be this -- since you've helped me a lot (allowed me to shoot with you, show the images where I wish, hand out biz cards to guests), give me YOUR RAW images. I'll then process them and export the RAWs with the XML files. You give those back. She throws them into LR and has your settings there.

She learns from you due to your openness and kindness. You've learned from her due to her openness and kindness. This is how you keep the cycle going :)

3. As Jaime said, you're showing her simple things that she WILL learn somewhere else if you don't show her. She's given you opportunity that you WILL NOT get somewhere else if she didn't offer.

So I totally think it's an understandable thing to ponder in your position, but I think you'd be best to help her out. In my opinion, it's always better for business to be open and kind so long as it won't seriously harm your business. I believe it allows for a lot more good things to come your way.


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 66
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Jul 04, 2012 03:22 as a reply to  @ bnlearle's post |  #26

A birdie tells me you're starting to regret all this "working for free" stuff and it's starting to eat at you. That could grow into something ugly that spoils a beautiful and mutually benefitial (and carreer making) opportunity. Either start getting paid or reconcile it within yourself that it's worth the non-monitary benefit.

IMHO: If she is arranging a whole fake wedding for a magazine and allowing you to be involved and published ... WOW! You're getting paid in spades in the form of rubbing shoulders with a true artist (in the "art" of making this business happen).

There are a lot of amazing photographers who don't book squat and can't sell themselves for what they're worth if their life depended on it! Post processing ... a top Graphic Artist might get $25/hr.

My vote is; keep rubbing shoulders with this lady. Refusing to show her your PP methods, or even withholding details of your method, seems petty. Work into getting fair monitary compensation but keep it alive until you get established with your own clients and portfolio. Hell; the mere opportunity to pass out cards at her wedding is a carreer making gift! The fact that you have talent makes it all the more valuable ... build up a great portfolio that doesn't repeat the same B&G and in another year you'll be all set!

I'd suggest giving her all the free LR lessons she desires. It doesn't sound like she's holding out on you ... except monitarily.

On the flip side; I wouldn't agree to any more freebies. After the next 5 are done, she should at least value you enough to pay the usual pittance of $100 or $200. You surely have negligible expenses (gas, lost small items, ...).


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mirrorrim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
87 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jul 04, 2012 09:32 |  #27

Updated my first post




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RangersForever
Senior Member
302 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Jul 04, 2012 22:34 |  #28

Chances are if you tell her the presets you used she still won't be able to pull of the same style of images as you since composition plays a major part in it. Her pictures will have the same "colors" as yours but your will still look like "your style."

Return the favor and let her in on your "secret" as there's not much chance it can really hurt you.


Scotland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 66
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Jul 05, 2012 01:24 |  #29

mirrorrim wrote in post #14669297 (external link)
Updated my first post

Maybe its my monitor but the exposure seems a bit blown-out. I'm struggling to see what all the fuss is over.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,664 views & 0 likes for this thread
WWYD: Primary photog wants to duplicate my LR settings. Do I tell?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Ronaldwilliam
676 guests, 277 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.