Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > Talk About Photography > Still Life, B/W & Experimental Talk
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25th of March 2012 (Sun)   #1
baj2k
Member
 
baj2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF Bay Area, NorCal
Posts: 423
Default First attempt at B&W

This is my first attempt at B&W. I'm new to photography -- only been at it since Dec. 2011. I have always been fascinated by how expressive B&W photos can be.

Anyway, I took a photo of a tulip (in know how clichι) but they were blooming in my backyard and I wanted to try my new lens (not the best FL for this picture but I was testing the lens).

The setup: 60D - Rokinon 85mm @ f/1.4 - ISO100 - 1/2000 - MF (other than zeroing out the saturation no other PP was done...) I wanted it soft around the edges, stark dark background, and the focus gradually drawing you in to the center. Looking at it now I'm thinking f/1.4 was to narrow of a DOF and/or I should have focused on the center of the petal and not the stamen.

I could use some feedback, encouragement, pointers, tips, etc... I have a thick skin so I'd rather hear it as it is or I'll never get better...

__________________
Canon 5D MkIII (Gripped) | Canon 70-200mm ƒ/2.8L II | Canon 24-70mm ƒ/2.8L II | Canon 24mm ƒ/1.4L II | Sigma 35mm ƒ/1.4 "Art" | Sigma 50mm ƒ/1.4 | RRS TVC-34L Tripod | RRS BH-55-Pro Ballhead | Giottos MM9170 Monopod | Canon 580EX II | Zacuto Z-Finder Pro 2.5X | Kata "BB" PL-220 Pack & PL-LT-317 Sling | Wishlist: Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | FS: FEISOL CT-3441T | Manfrotto Mg MH054M0-Q2 Ballhead | Canon 85mm ƒ/1.8 | Canon 50mm ƒ/1.8 II
baj2k is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 28th of March 2012 (Wed)   #2
PhotosGuy
Moderator
 
PhotosGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. E. Michigan
Posts: 64,302
Default Re: First attempt at B&W

Quote:
I'm thinking f/1.4 was to narrow of a DOF and/or I should have focused on the center of the petal and not the stamen.
Maybe, but the stamen isn't sharp, either? Did you select the focus point that's on it, or focus & recompose? (Not a good idea.) I'd have used AI Servo, too, because it compensates if I move a little bit on close-ups, or the wind moves the subject.
And to me, that isn't a B&W shot. It's B&Gray. A little more contrast might help, or if the sun was more to the side.
Quote:
(other than zeroing out the saturation...
That's not the best way to convert to B&W. Most people pick one of the RGB channels & work with that.
My B&W action and sizing for POTN action...

B&W - in camera or in photoshop
__________________
FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
www.FrankCizek.com

Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?

Last edited by PhotosGuy : 28th of March 2012 (Wed) at 09:33.
PhotosGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th of July 2012 (Wed)   #3
fnothaft
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 574
Default Re: First attempt at B&W

I think it's a very good start for a first attempt. I have a few bits of advice though:
  • B&W is best when you use the full dynamic range of greyscale (PhotosGuy referred to this as B&Grey versus B&W). You definitely use the full low range, but you aren't really using the full high side of the range. You can do this best by setting the white and black clipping points of the image using the histogram/curves. You can also achieve the same thing (more or less) by pushing the exposure and contrast of the image as desired. I really recommend familiarizing yourself with the curves tool — this gives you the maximum control over tonality in digital B&W.
  • For macro(-esque) photography, you need to stop down more. Keep in mind, f/11 or even f/16 will occasionally give insufficient depth of field at a close distance. f/1.4 will give macroscopic depth of field.
  • The composition is OK, but B&W really allows you to explore contrast or texture. For B&W, try to build your compositions differently from what you might traditionally look for in color.
  • As PhotosGuy pointed out, desaturating is not the best way to go from color to B&W. For film B&W, you would actually use color filters to reduce the passage of certain colors of light. In digital, the equivalent is to use some form of color mixing which allows you to set the contribution of different colors to the photo. I'm not sure what tool you are using, but most tools have ways to do this.
__________________
Body: Canon EOS 5D Mark 2 • Lenses: Bower 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II, Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Lensbaby 2.0, Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, Canon EF 135 f/2L USM • Lighting: Canon Speedlite 580EX II • Support: Dolica CX620B104
Gear list • Website • Flickr
fnothaft is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 1st of December 2012 (Sat)   #4
arumdevil
Member
 
arumdevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 643
Default Re: First attempt at B&W

I agree with the above. Desaturate is the worst way to convert to B&W because you have very little control of the result, but even before that you need a photo with a wider tonal range to get the best results.

I'll try to illustrate my point with some old pictures.

These first two work ok, but mainly because there are other points of interest such as the silky smoothness of the water in the first one, and the reflection in the puddle in the second. But otherwise they are quite boring shots because of the high contrast and lack of mid-tones and the B&W doesn't really do enough to save them (particularly the second shot).




The next two have much more (and smoother) range in the mid-tones and still a high-contrast conversion which makes for a much more interesting shot.




So the first step to getting a good B&W image is really choosing the right subject.

A good starting point would be to gather a selection of example photos that you really like in B&W and try to analyse what it is that makes them work and why you like them. While you're looking also note a few that don't work so well and compare.

It shouldn't take you long to identify the sorts of scenes and subjects that are going to work well as a B&W conversion, and that's half the battle.
__________________
Regards, arum.
"Originality is merely an illusion" M.C.Escher

5Dc[+ML-BETA4] | 50 f/1.4 USM | 24 f/2.8 | 70-210 f/4 | YN560-II > gear list < Photos
arumdevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My 1st attempt vs my latest attempt Toxic Coolaid Astronomy and Celestial 23 29th of August 2011 (Mon) 20:57
Second moon attempt... since the first attempt was a fail! bc-chris Astronomy and Celestial 9 31st of August 2010 (Tue) 10:29
My first HDR attempt CalPiker HDR 4 18th of April 2010 (Sun) 23:46
My first attempt attempt at a full moon jsilva Nature & Landscapes 4 22nd of June 2008 (Sun) 09:15


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.