LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Sigma 500mm f/4.5 APO

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk
Thread started 27 Jul 2012 (Friday) 12:03   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
mhrok
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

Hah, finally I'm getting into birding at low cost, although not without issues -- getting the older Sigma 500 f/4.5 APO AF (not the HSM, EX or DG), I guess the one coming from the 'ZEN' times. Will only be able to easily shoot wide open, but hey, got it cheaper than a used Canon 400L 5.6 :).

Does anyone with practical experiences have comments about this lens and how it compares with the later birding lenses? There are some comparisons online between the current Sigma 500 4.5 EX DG HSM and Canon 500L IS, but only Dyxxum has anything about the old one at all.

Anyways, I will post here my thoughts about it, or maybe on the lenses subforum if that is a more appropriate place. I'm just really excited about my ultra cheap fast supertele :).

Post #1, Jul 27, 2012 12:03:44




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jodelak
Cream of the Crop
jodelak's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
8,399 posts
Vancouver Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Sorry no experience on this lens but hope somebody here can share their experiences. Start shooting and post it here (Birds photo section) :)

Post #2, Jul 27, 2012 22:41:03


... does it really matter?
i see with my eyes, i shoot with my fingers.

My Flickr Pageexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
hari ­ ari
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2005
9 posts
uk
[MORE/SHARE]

I used to use regularly from new in the mid 90s until 2001 when I upgraded to a Canon 600f4.
I have only used it with film (slides) with Canon EOS 3 and 5 film cameras. I was an excellent and affordable introduction into long lens. I was light (relatively speaking), AF was middling, contrast and resolving power was better than average. Also was relable (it was not used with kid gloves) and was exposed to all kinds of enviromnent in Africa.
A word of caution, make sure that it will work with the modern cameras. Some older Sigma lens have had to be modified (rechipped) to work with the current crop of Canon bodies. Also Sigma has not been able to modify some older lens.
As I mentioned, it is an affordable entry to the use of long lens. Trust that you enjoy the lens as much as I did.

Post #3, Jul 28, 2012 05:19:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Billginthekeys's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
7,354 posts
Islamorada, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

I will echo what Hari said, did you check to make sure it will AF at all with your camera? I had a chance to pick up an old Sigma 500mm for a song (at least the 500mm equivalent of a song), but the owner said it didn't AF on any of his digital bodies either, so I skipped it.

Now some as I understand it do AF, but only wide open, some have been rechipped to work fully with certain bodies, some don't work at all, some work fine, and there seems to be no solid list of what is what with what lens on what body.

Anyway, wish you the best of luck with it and hope it works out fine.

Post #4, Jul 28, 2012 07:37:27


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Galleryexternal linkMy Gear
what the L. just go for it.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mhrok
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for responses! I saw virtually nothing at POTN about this lens, everyone seems to say the later EX is a great alternative for the 500L if you can't afford that, but no one mentioning anything about the pre-EX version. There are a few photos taken with it at Dyxumexternal link, but photos are as good as the remainder of the gear and the photographer, so can't really get anything out of that.

CDS seems said once or twice to stay away from the pre-EX version and run as fast as you can if you get close to it, but I guess just because some sellers still try to peddle them for as much as $2500 on ripoffbay. :)

Yes, going into this I knew it will likely AF on my body, but won't be able to change aperture unless I manage to disassemble the lens mount: someone on DPR got an older Sigma 24mm and apparently was able to shoot at the aperture the lens was at.. maybe that will work, maybe it won't. Anyhow, in the worst case I got a decent 500mm that will work with a fixed aperture up to f/4.5, at a price much lower than the Canon FD long primes go for.

I should have the lens at the end of this week. Before I will be able to get good photos from it I will need to learn long lens technique, probably get a full gimbal too. As soon as I can do some tests I will post them to the forums, in the Lens archive and Bird Photo section if they happen to be of birds. I have some blue jays visiting frequently, plus tons of hummingbirds, so those are likely to be frequent subjects :).

Post #5, Jul 28, 2012 13:48:39 as a reply to Billginthekeys's post 6 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
hari ­ ari
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2005
9 posts
uk
[MORE/SHARE]

Good luck with your new aquisition. I would like to know as to how u get on with it. If I recall correctly, the sweet spot was at f8.

Post #6, Jul 29, 2012 05:56:48




LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Weinman
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2006
1,220 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I used to shoot with a guy that had one and he got pretty good results but that was back in the film days and I don't know if it would AF with a digital body. I would contact Sigma and see if they still support this lens, if they do maybe you could get it reshipped for a current body.

Post #7, Jul 29, 2012 11:46:07


7D Mark II 6D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm 1.4 TC 2X TC 580EX 430 EX II MT 24 EX Tamron 150-600

LOG IN TO REPLY
mhrok
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

By multiple reports, Sigma does not rechip bodies, so it's either been rechipped already or it's not going to be. Some lenses also were never allowed to be rechipped, because they didn't care: they were old when the need arose.

Post #8, Aug 01, 2012 16:53:18 as a reply to Larry Weinman's post 3 days earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
chubri777
Goldmember
chubri777's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
1,514 posts
Cameron Park, Ca.
[MORE/SHARE]

I use this lens. It's not chipped so I have to shoot everything wide open. Auto focus works but is slow. Now my auto focus motor seems like it's going out. I've used it on a 20 and 30D and tested it on a 50D and a 7D and the auto focus worked the same. Toughest part is getting used to shooting with a shallow DOF.
The majority of these were shot with this lens.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/17627582@N08/external link

Post #9, Aug 02, 2012 20:29:59


Regards,
Chuck
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/17627582@N08/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mhrok
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

Lens is on its way.. a few more days. Now gotta get a gimbal head for it and a decent plate.

Chuck, how do you carry it around? Backpack, or something like the Lens Trekker?

Post #10, Aug 02, 2012 22:17:51 as a reply to chubri777's post 1 hour earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
chubri777
Goldmember
chubri777's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
1,514 posts
Cameron Park, Ca.
[MORE/SHARE]

Carry it around by the camera. The tripod foot broke off a long time ago. I have always handheld this beast.

Post #11, Aug 02, 2012 22:39:39


Regards,
Chuck
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/17627582@N08/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mhrok
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

Impressive shots in general, great for being handheld!

Post #12, Aug 02, 2012 22:54:42 as a reply to chubri777's post 15 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
mhrok
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

The lens arrived today, and as expected it shows Err 01 if I try to shot with anything else than wide open. However, even wide open it looks really sharp; the only thing that scares me is how much things wobble at 500mm, or 800mm FF equivalent. I was looking and focusing manually through LiveView and my screen was jumping all over the place just because of tiny breeze! Insane. Should I get a gimbal head?

Another thing that is weird is that the lens is.. small? Light? I never had the Canon 500L in my hands, but I expected this lens to be much heavier; well, it isn't. Also, it fits well in Tamrac Expedition 7x, though not with the extra screw-in hood.

More when I get some decent sample photos.

BTW: is there a way to lock the retractable hood? It's really bad when the big hood collapses..

Post #13, Aug 09, 2012 00:04:33 as a reply to mhrok's post 6 days earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
chubri777
Goldmember
chubri777's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
1,514 posts
Cameron Park, Ca.
[MORE/SHARE]

Slide it out and twist it until it locks. I keep both hoods on mine at all times. Makes it a little more balanced.
It weighs real close to what the Canon 500 weighs so yeah, get a gimbal head.

Post #14, Aug 10, 2012 01:00:49


Regards,
Chuck
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/17627582@N08/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mhrok
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Mar 2011
59 posts
SF Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks Chuck, I tried twisting it for a long time but weren't persistent enough. Also, I have to turn it clockwise while the add-on has to be turned anticlockwise, so thought they both go in the same direction. After locking it everything seems rock solid, I mean the hoods are both metal. Really nice build quality.

Post #15, Aug 12, 2012 01:17:48 as a reply to chubri777's post 2 days earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
4,151 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 500mm f/4.5 APO
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00198 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
816 guests, 598 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is N4Ld3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.