LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


lens choice for indoor basketball

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk
Thread started 27 Jul 2012 (Friday) 23:20   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
AusDoug
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2012
6 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hello,

My daughter is starting to play basketball, so my wife has volunteered me to take pictures of the team. I've read quite a bit of various posts and have learned quite a bit. However, I have one question about lens choice.

I have a 7D with a 50m 1.4 lens and a 24-105 4L lens (with image stabilisation). Now I'm a bit confused as to whether it's better to shoot with the faster lens (1.4) or a slower lens (better quality) with image stabilisation.

Based on the posts in various threads, I plan to use:

1. ISO of 1,600
2. manual exposure (since the court is indoors and evenly lit)
3. single point of focus (centre focus point)
4. minimum shutter speed of 1/500

Thanks for your help.

Post #1, Jul 27, 2012 23:20:42


7D - 24-105L - 70-200L - 50/1.4 - 85/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Croasdail
Cream of the Crop
Joined Apr 2005
6,590 posts
North Carolina
[MORE/SHARE]

Not to rain on your parade, but unless she is playing at a division 1 college arena, your assumption that you will have even lighting is a bit premature. I agree with the premise of shooting manual, but don't be really surprised if the lighting isn't what you thought it was.

The IS means nothing here, so ignore that fact. In most likelihood your f4 lens well be way too slow. You will either have to bump you ISO or decrease your shutter speed. If you are shooting from the ends of the court, action coming toward you, you actually can shoot much slow shutter speeds and have things work out. But baseline access is rare... so I wouldn't plan on it.... though use it if available.

Long story short is that you will likely need to use your 50. With the 50 you will really need to plan your seat well because often it will be too short. You really don't have an ideal lens, but you 50 is the best choice of the two. I prefer an 85 and shooting from the corners of the court when doing high school. In the early days when my son played I used a 24-70 f2.8, and had decent results in high school gyms.

Post #2, Jul 27, 2012 23:44:03


Mark
Its by knowing and mastering all the rules that you learn which ones you can break.

LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
DC Fan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
5,732 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

AusDoug wrote in post #14780101external link
Hello,

My daughter is starting to play basketball, so my wife has volunteered me to take pictures of the team. I've read quite a bit of various posts and have learned quite a bit. However, I have one question about lens choice.

I have a 7D with a 50m 1.4 lens and a 24-105 4L lens (with image stabilisation). Now I'm a bit confused as to whether it's better to shoot with the faster lens (1.4) or a slower lens (better quality) with image stabilisation.

Based on the posts in various threads, I plan to use:

1. ISO of 1,600
2. manual exposure (since the court is indoors and evenly lit)
3. single point of focus (centre focus point)
4. minimum shutter speed of 1/500

Thanks for your help.


The near-universal choice for a basic basketball lens for indoor available-light photography, is a 70-200mm f/2.8.

Example from a Sigma version.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Aperture: f/2.8
Exposure Time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
ISO equiv: 6400
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Manual
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

However, considering the illumination (or lack of such), in all but the very brightest gyms, you'll find the a 24-105 /f.4 lens (which transmits less light than a f/2.8 lens), will not capture enough light to use the exposure settings listed. That leaves the 50mm f/1.4 lens as the best to use.

The faster lens, while limited in field of view, will handle indifferently-illuminated gyms.

Examples from a similar Canon 50mm f/1.8 II.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Focal Length: 50.0mm
Aperture: f/1.8
Exposure Time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
ISO equiv: 1600
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Focal Length: 50.0mm
Aperture: f/2.0
Exposure Time: 0.0013 s (1/800)
ISO equiv: 2000
Exposure Bias: none
White Balance: Manual
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

Even with a f/1.4, don't be surprised if you need to use an ISO higher than 1600 in the dimmest gyms.

Post #3, Jul 28, 2012 00:02:33




LOG IN TO REPLY
AusDoug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2012
6 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

G'day,

Croasdail wrote in post #14780141external link
Not to rain on your parade, but unless she is playing at a division 1 college arena, your assumption that you will have even lighting is a bit premature. I agree with the premise of shooting manual, but don't be really surprised if the lighting isn't what you thought it was.

Yes, you're right. She's playing with the other elementary school kids in the local gym. To my untrained eye, the light looks even, but no doubt there are brighter and darker patches.

Croasdail wrote in post #14780141external link
Long story short is that you will likely need to use your 50. With the 50 you will really need to plan your seat well because often it will be too short. You really don't have an ideal lens, but you 50 is the best choice of the two. I prefer an 85 and shooting from the corners of the court when doing high school. In the early days when my son played I used a 24-70 f2.8, and had decent results in high school gyms.

Excellent advice. I have a 50m 1.4 and an 85m 1.8, so will experiment with both of them. Shooting from the corner makes quite a bit of sense, because it considerably lowers the likelihood of catching a basketball with the front of the lens. As well, I assume that having the kids not running directly at me will increase the likelihood of accurate focussing.

The pictures I shot earlier don't look sharp at all, but I only shot at 1/250. Going up to 1/500 will hopefully help with the results. No doubt shooting a few thousand pictures and studying the results will create better pictures too...

Thanks for taking the time to respond to my question.

Post #4, Jul 28, 2012 00:33:45


7D - 24-105L - 70-200L - 50/1.4 - 85/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Senior Member
bpalermini's Avatar
Joined Mar 2011
653 posts
Los Angeles, California
[MORE/SHARE]

Yup, 50 and 85 are two good choices. I'd shoot at f2, hopefully at ISO3200 you can get 1/400 or better. That's about what I see for the low end at the gyms I shoot at. Last year I shot with a 50D and 3200 was as high as I felt I could to go.

With the 50 you will want to shoot from closer to the basket, even with the 85, I would be in from the corner.

Post #5, Jul 28, 2012 01:01:06 as a reply to AusDoug's post 27 minutes earlier.


Bob Palermini
1DX, 1DIV, 50D, 16-35L, 24-70L II, 100L, 24-105L, 70-200 IS 2.8L, 300 IS 2.8L, 400mm 2.8 IS II, 1.4xII, 2xII, 580EXII, YN565EX, RRS TVC23 + BH55, LR5, Fuji X30
My Web Siteexternal link | My Sports Portfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AusDoug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2012
6 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

G'day,

DC Fan wrote in post #14780194external link
Examples from a similar Canon 50mm f/1.8 II.

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Focal Length: 50.0mm
Aperture: f/1.8
Exposure Time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
ISO equiv: 1600
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

Even with a f/1.4, don't be surprised if you need to use an ISO higher than 1600 in the dimmest gyms.

Yes, this is an excellent example of what happened this week. As your picture above illustrates, the letters on the uniform looks crisp, but the young man's face isn't as sharp. (Please don't misinterpret this as criticism of your pictures -- it's what happened to my pictures of my daughter's game -- I just don't understand why.)

I wasn't sure if the lack of definition in the eyes and on the face resulted from a too-slow shutter speed. However, you shot the picture above at 1/500. Therefore I wonder if I'm expecting too much from the light in the gym. My other thought is that maybe I'm inadvertently focussing on the wrong part of the player (uniform instead of face).

In any event, I'll definitely use the faster lens. Thanks for taking the time to reply to my question with the excellent examples of pictures.

Post #6, Jul 28, 2012 01:03:56


7D - 24-105L - 70-200L - 50/1.4 - 85/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
abbypanda
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2011
1,777 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I agree if those 2 are your choices the 50. I got a lot of nice pics with my 50mm 1.4. If you can get close it's great.

Post #7, Jul 28, 2012 01:34:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
DC Fan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
5,732 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

AusDoug wrote in post #14780334external link
G'day,

Yes, this is an excellent example of what happened this week. As your picture above illustrates, the letters on the uniform looks crisp, but the young man's face isn't as sharp. (Please don't misinterpret this as criticism of your pictures -- it's what happened to my pictures of my daughter's game -- I just don't understand why.)

I wasn't sure if the lack of definition in the eyes and on the face resulted from a too-slow shutter speed. However, you shot the picture above at 1/500. Therefore I wonder if I'm expecting too much from the light in the gym. My other thought is that maybe I'm inadvertently focussing on the wrong part of the player (uniform instead of face).

In any event, I'll definitely use the faster lens. Thanks for taking the time to reply to my question with the excellent examples of pictures.

Fast lenses (such as a f/1.4) have shallow depth of field.

Post #8, Jul 28, 2012 08:59:20




LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
snyderman's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
7,075 posts
Wadsworth, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

Standard settings for MOST gyms using a 7D and 85mm f/1.8 and a 50mm f/1.4. Then some comments afterward:

Setting: 7D, AI Servo, centerpoint only (the one that looks like this: [o] is best!) and usual sports settings. Either lens set to f/2, shutter speed to 1/640 and ISO setting that ensures proper exposure. Usually we're talking numbers like 1600-2000.

I've been lucky that most gyms in my local school's conference are really nicely lit and even across the floor for the most part.

As someone mentioned, the 50mm is really short and wide. Good for getting free-throw shots and at least one side of the rebounding team in the same shot. The 85mm f/1.8 on a 7D is perfect for everything inside the 3-point line. Good vantage points for using the 85mm is 3' behind the baseline and 3-10' inside the sideline.

Here's a shot from that vantage point with 7D and 85mm f/1.8 lens shot at f/2, 1/640 and probably ISO 1250. Best lit HS gym I've ever shot in:

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5257/5399111366_f93ab2c510_z.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...erphotography/53991​11366/]external link
IMG_2834external link by snyderman3external link, on Flickr

Bottom line for your wife is that she HAS to be on the floor, near the action to get shots like above. Not UNDER the basket, but somewhere inside the sideline and behind the baseline.

dave

Post #9, Jul 28, 2012 13:00:48


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

LOG IN TO REPLY
8612images
Senior Member
8612images's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
523 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

85mm f1.8 does real well on the 7d. 70-200mm f2.8 if the lighting is good enough.

Post #10, Aug 09, 2012 21:59:30


Steve

LOG IN TO REPLY
AusDoug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Jul 2012
6 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

G'day,

Just a brief note to say thank you to everyone who provided advice in this thread. I took more pictures of my daughter's recent game and they were -much- better.

1. 85mm 1.8 lens
2. manual settings of f2, 1/500, ISO 1,600
3. servo mode with centre focus and expanded focus

If I could ask one last question, is there a general ratio for ISO and noise reduction in Lightroom. Because the high ISO resulted in noise, I've found that a luminence noise reduction of 30 has relatively good results. Does that sound about right?

Thanks again to everyone for all your help.

Post #11, Aug 12, 2012 05:16:22


7D - 24-105L - 70-200L - 50/1.4 - 85/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sch_photo
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
172 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I have three high school sports accounts and I shoot hoops one way: Strobed with a 70-200 and a 24-105. Now you might not have the money for it, but if she starts moving up through the levels and sticks with it. There really isn't a better way to shoot in my opinion.

Post #12, Aug 15, 2012 04:13:29


Equipment list: Canon 1Dx, Canon 1D mk III, 50D, 400mm 2.8L, 70-200mm 2.8L, 17-40 4.0L, 24-105 4.0L IS, Sigma 15mm 2.8 FE, (2) 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
dwarrenr
Goldmember
dwarrenr's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
1,650 posts
Fairland, Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

AusDoug wrote in post #14847435external link
G'day,
If I could ask one last question, is there a general ratio for ISO and noise reduction in Lightroom. Because the high ISO resulted in noise, I've found that a luminence noise reduction of 30 has relatively good results. Does that sound about right?

Thanks again to everyone for all your help.

There is no set rule as each sensor type will produce different amounts of noise.

Here is a shot with a 1DMkIV at ISO 10,000 (f/2.8, 1/640):

IMAGE: http://www.robison-photography.com/img/s11/v37/p680877509-4.jpg

It would not be close as clean and sharp with a 'lesser' sensor.

Lightroom makes it real easy. Just find your first image that is well exposed and sharp focus, adjust until it looks the best, then sync your color balance, and noise settings and then they are all ready for cropping and other adjustments.

Post #13, Aug 15, 2012 06:42:16


D. Warren Robison
"All guys feel the need to compensate. Most compensate with sports cars. I compensate with a 400mm 2.8"
Flickrexternal link - Home Pageexternal link - MaxPreps Gallery -external linkRazziexternal link
Equipment List

LOG IN TO REPLY
missjtiger
Member
missjtiger's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
69 posts
Olive Branch MS
[MORE/SHARE]

notice what I captured on the far left side of photo.....my bud, d.j. Stephens (won a national dunk contest in 2012) jumping up in excitement.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i130.photobucke​t.com ...12643266_1227630254​_n.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #14, Aug 15, 2012 17:17:29


new to serious photography but learning !
http://www.facebook.co​m/janice.kolbexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
missjtiger
Member
missjtiger's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
69 posts
Olive Branch MS
[MORE/SHARE]

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i130.photobucke​t.com ...s/EastCarolina20121​96.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #15, Aug 15, 2012 17:20:58


new to serious photography but learning !
http://www.facebook.co​m/janice.kolbexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
5,537 views & 0 likes for this thread
lens choice for indoor basketball
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00101 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
847 guests, 783 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is gar612

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.